Argumentative Essay #1: Technology reducing crime in society You turn to your left you see a phone, you turn to your right you see a surveillance camera. Cameras can be found anywhere. They help the society but also cause violence. People use cameras for good reasons, on the other hand, criminals use cameras to make your private life public. Overall, has cameras reduced violence? Cameras have reduced violence because people with camera phones can report incidents, body cams on officers reduce police violence, and public surveillance locate missing vehicles and people. To begin, cameras curtail violence because civilians with camera phones can record and report incidents. In the 2005 bombing, “Police in London used cell phone images to find
…show more content…
According to San Diego Tribune, “serious allegations related to criminal behavior, discrimination, force and racial or ethnic slurs are down 47.4 percent”(Garrick). When the police have body cams, their brutality and criminal like activity drops dramatically. This leads to the police focusing more on their job. The body cams make it feel like their boss is always next to them so they have the obligation to perform at their very best. Time magazine says, “Over the last five years, on average, the CCRB was able to substantiate police misconduct with video at twice the rate of misconduct without video — 18.6% compared to 9.3%.”(Wiley). This quote points out that body cams help tip the direction of a case between a civilian and a cop. This body cams help protect civilians from unethical actions and police from untrue statements from the people. Others may argue, the government can not control when officers can activate or deactivate the body cams; but, the San Jose Police Department says, “Body-worn camera recordings shall not be intentionally terminated until the conclusion of the encounter, except for tactical or safety reasons, or the encounter no longer holds evidentiary or investigative value”(San Jose Police Department Body Worn Camera Policy). This quote proves that police officers can not deliberately turn off their body cams, and if they do so it might result in consequences.. Clearly, body cameras on officers reduce their brutality and criminal
According to San Diego Tribune, “serious allegations related to criminal behavior, discrimination, force and racial or ethnic slurs are down 47.4 percent”(Garrick). When the police have body cams, their brutality and criminal like activity drops dramatically. This leads to the police focusing more on their job. The body cams make it feel like their boss is always next to them so they have the obligation to perform at their very best. Time magazine says, “Over the last five years, on average, the CCRB was able to substantiate police misconduct with video at twice the rate of misconduct without video — 18.6% compared to 9.3%.”(Wiley). This quote points out that body cams help tip the direction of a case between a civilian and a cop. This body cams help protect civilians from unethical actions and police from untrue statements from the people. Others may argue, the government can not control when officers can activate or deactivate the body cams; but, the San Jose Police Department says, “Body-worn camera recordings shall not be intentionally terminated until the conclusion of the encounter, except for tactical or safety reasons, or the encounter no longer holds evidentiary or investigative value”(San Jose Police Department Body Worn Camera Policy). This quote proves that police officers can not deliberately turn off their body cams, and if they do so it might result in consequences.. Clearly, body cameras on officers reduce their brutality and criminal