Argumentative Essay: Should The Government Monitoring Internet Content?

Decent Essays
"We the Students Do you think that the federal, state, and local government should have the duty to monitor internet content? I think that it could go both ways. If the government could see and monitor our internet content then it could save lives and stop people from doing wrong things. For example, if someone was texting their friend saying goodbye like they were going to commit suicide then the government could stop them in time. But also, if they government could monitor what we do, we might have to pay for access to the internet and we wouldn’t be allowed to search the internet freely. For example, in the first amendment it gives us freedom of speech. This could mean freedom of speech on the internet as well. Either way, the government monitoring our internet content could be both bad and good depending on the situation. …show more content…
In the article “Texting suicide verdict could set bad precedent, legal experts say! By: USA Today,” it states, “Carter and Roy were teenagers when Roy, then 18, took his own life in 2014 by pumping his truck cab full of carbon monoxide. During their largely virtual relationship, which started in 2012, the two had traded some texts in which Carter urged Roy to kill himself.” If the local or state government had been monitoring these text messages, Roy might not of commited suicide. Even though having the government monitor internet content could be helpful, Freedom of Speech still needs to be available for those using the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution reiterated the notion of a government that was not intrusive to the public. Coming from England, there was constant dictation upon the citizens. The Founding Fathers wanted to construct a powerful nation while remaining respectful of the liberties and freedoms of individuals. Having tradition prominent throughout America’s history, it would be hypocritical to go against the Founding Fathers beliefs on freedom and the free will of the people. Therefore, having the government monitor the internet would break the institution of Americans being able to communicate and learn freely.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the incident on September 11, 2001 we had an act that was passed in haste only 45 days after the attack. We had an act that was passed by George W Bush in a time of fear and unease . Even though we 're trying to protect American liberties from enemies, it is wrong to take away individual rights. One act before the patriot act was Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1968 Also called “Wiretap Statute” which restricted the government 's ability to listen to private conversation, both was controversial because it was signed in 1968 and we did not have the technology we had back then like laptops and cell phones which could be used in very bad ways to hurt or even worse kill people (Patriot)But it also could be a burden for the innocent people who have the government listen on to their private conversations which would take away their constitutional right to privacy. So too little of not listing and to much of listening in on peoples conversations is a bad thing, that 's why we should find a balance between the two so we don 't change the principles we have as a country .…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Internet is a complex group of networks that can be very useful tool for research, and there are some sites use for social media. “The Undercover Parent”, written by Harlan Coben, believes that by spying on teen’s Internet use, through the use of spyware, is a good idea. So should teens have the right to privacy online? Yes, they should have privacy whilst texting and online, here are some reasons why. Teens should be able to speak online without fear of being watched.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Do you as an American citizen ever feel like you are trapped in George Orwell’s 1984 society? Do you ever feel like the government is watching your every move, molding you into the “perfect” citizens? If so, you have the Patriot Act to thank. The United States Patriot Act is an Act set by Congress, signed by former President George W. Bush, following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, as well as the 2001 anthrax attacks. The Patriot Act is actually an acronym, standing for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.”…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Say Hey to the NSA Is violating the Constitution and using an ineffective counterterrorism method the best way to gather intelligence? If this constitutionally questionable method only began 1.8 percent of terror investigations, the answer seems obvious. Proponents of the National Security Agency’s programs such as PRISM will claim it is vital to protect the nation against terrorists and is well within the law.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Teens Be Limited Online Teens should be limited to the time they spend online. There are many strong reasons that support this opinion. A large majority of teens waist their lives inside the online digital world instead of spending time in the real world. Teens seem to think that after spending countless hours online that without it their lives would be over.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civic Duty

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " When examining the question Does government have the civic duty to monitor internet content, I look at the internet for answers. I determined that the government doesn't exactly control because social media reserves its rights to be free from control in the clause of the first amendment "" Freedom of the Press"". At first I believed this statement but when looking at more information I learned that our local governments turn to social media first when looking for a person. I was talking to a police officer when he told me something that stuck with me. " "Everything you thought you deleted never really did get deleted off the internet"".…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance Of The National Security Agency

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    This procedure can be quite noticeable because once you visit a site for example, Nike.com, and go to a site like Facebook, an ad for a Nike product will consistently appear. Though the method is used for website owners to monitor the vigor of their site, government has taken it to another level by using it as a highway into our thoughts. We use the internet every day, with blogs, vlogs (video blogs), and the highly trending use of social media. We put our positions, feelings, and thoughts online to share with the world. This makes us conscious of what we write and aware of whom reads it, but unconscious of the fact that everyone interprets things in different ways, and that someone can be a person watching for suspicious things said.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons that make it necessary to monitor internet content, but there is also a certain line that should not be crossed. People’s privacy is important and should not be violated unless it is absolutely needed. In the United States we have many freedoms, and although there is no mention of privacy in the constitution, because of our freedom we are entitled to having our privacy, to an extent. If the government does feel the need to monitor one’s internet content, they must have a valid reason and they should not give that personal information out to anyone else.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After the dramatic and horrible acts committed on September 11, 2001, the world was in shock. The magnitude of the terrorist attacks were nothing to be overlooked. The United States knew they had to find a way to keep the people calm and in a safe place. Forty-five days after the terrorist attacks on the nation, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, acronym for the “ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act. The acts primitive intentions wants to find and prosecute any terrorist suspect in any corner of the nation.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After terrorists attacks began progressing throughout the year, many precautions began taking place. NSA wiretapping amongst the many has been a big issue due to lack of privacy at your own hand; but if you have nothing to hide you’re fine right? Social media is a big linking connection to terrorism, but not so much as a cause as much as a provoking mental outbreak. Methods used for torture, whether to do the torturing or implementing seeds to provoke torture amongst each other. Many methods and tactics were used and are connected to each other; but who is really to blame and who deserves to suffer because of it?…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example why many people do not accept surveillance is because it has also affect the people by causing discrimination against one another. Greenwald also states “Some of the surveillance was ostensibly devoted to terrorism suspects. But great quantities of the program manifestation have nothing to do with national security.” (94) In this quote Greenwald says that many of the programs have nothing to do with national security because they don’t just see the information or everything there surveillance is capturing the government is saving everything not for a day nor a week but for years and this is information that they don’t need to have.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article entitled “Internet Access Is Not a Human Right” published on the website of The New York Times on 4 January 2012, Vincent G. Cerf, a vice president and chief Internet evangelist for Google, presents his perspective on a controversial issue regarding access to the Internet. He argues that access to the Internet should not be accepted as a human right, “it’s just a tool to achieve those rights.” According to Internet World Stats (2014), over a third of the world’s population are accessing the Internet as a part of their everyday life. This proves that the Internet plays numerous significant roles in society. It makes our lives easier and more convenient than in the past, by providing information, education, communication, business, and freedom of expression.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are you a victim of Internet addiction? Do you feel like a tangled mess of iPhones, laptops and tablets? Do you check your Facebook first thing in the morning? Do you update your twitter on the hour? Has your curiosity taken over your lifestyle?…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays