One day in English class, my class and I were assigned to choose a certain topic to debate about with another partner. I decided to quickly choose the one that was well related to me, about music and censorship. There were other topics to choose from: immigration reforms, confederate flag issues, and fast food industry success. Music was an easy choice since it has always been a backbone of my life. For me, music didn’t have to be censored because it expressed our message to the world. What could our culture be without music today? Music has been around for thousands of years, but it wasn't the same as what we have today. Day after day, I would feel that music is still growing at a tremendous rate. From hundreds of sources, music is popping
…show more content…
Who was this music being directed to actually? Different genres get accepted by a mix of races throughout the whole world. Music connects people from all over: different countries, different languages, and different ethnicities. My argument was set at a strong point because music could not be stopped and not especially in today’s “world”. Social media has been a great advantage for music to be shared worldwide to millions of users surfing the web daily. Music helps people develop and become someone new by learning a new experience. Should it be taken from us? All music does is change the world, give people the freedom of expression and growth. As teens say nowadays, “Music is my life”, and it is true for me because it gives me motivation on a daily basis. Some songs may talk about sex, drugs, and violence, but all it is describing is the life of what hundreds artists have gone through at some point in their life. My opponent would still argue on how the older crowd should lead on the younger ones into a productive environment instead of introducing hood music to a child at a young age. Music can be expressed in various different ways. One of the most probable ways is having explicit language. The explicit language on a track quickly categorizes the song with a “Parental Advisory” label, showing that it is not recommended to a younger
Who was this music being directed to actually? Different genres get accepted by a mix of races throughout the whole world. Music connects people from all over: different countries, different languages, and different ethnicities. My argument was set at a strong point because music could not be stopped and not especially in today’s “world”. Social media has been a great advantage for music to be shared worldwide to millions of users surfing the web daily. Music helps people develop and become someone new by learning a new experience. Should it be taken from us? All music does is change the world, give people the freedom of expression and growth. As teens say nowadays, “Music is my life”, and it is true for me because it gives me motivation on a daily basis. Some songs may talk about sex, drugs, and violence, but all it is describing is the life of what hundreds artists have gone through at some point in their life. My opponent would still argue on how the older crowd should lead on the younger ones into a productive environment instead of introducing hood music to a child at a young age. Music can be expressed in various different ways. One of the most probable ways is having explicit language. The explicit language on a track quickly categorizes the song with a “Parental Advisory” label, showing that it is not recommended to a younger