From financial expenses to the loss of rich history, it comes to great cost to separate and become an independent country. On the other hand, becoming an independent country can allow its people to have a powerful say in the politics, rather than being alienated when one should rightly be involved in the politics governing one’s province. However, considering both issues, Canada should not separate because it is a country that functions by depending on the advantages and differences each province has to offer.
Although Ontario generates 37% of the national GDP and is a substantial part of the North American manufacturing, (“About Ontario”) it wouldn't have been able to reach this favorable economy without the support and the advantages its …show more content…
Hence, creating the argument that Canada should separate. However, even though The North, consisting of the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, face many economic challenges such as poverty and climate change, they have an advantageous offer that exists due to the vast size and geographic variety in Canada. In other words, it's the ice sheets that have allowed The North to have its own regional and cultural diversity, such as developing a distinct way of life by having an economy that depends on working and living on frozen land and its own language, values, etc. However, the ice sheets that cover “40% of Canada’s landmass” (“The Canadian Arctic”) and is “162,000 km of Arctic coastline” (“Fisheries and Oceans Canada”) are melting as a result of climate change. Allowing massive resources in The North and Arctic to be more accessible. However, if Canada separates, these resources will be lost to competitors such as Russia. Thus, staying united will allow provinces to combine their power to obtain those resources and benefit Canada by taking advantage of those resource …show more content…
Even though, few people believe a country should have the same views and opinions to succeed, many disagree. As a result of Canada’s large size, ethnicities, races, sexes, and different people from each province bring different views on an issue that have not been previously considered. Thus, “helps ensure that no issue is examined from only one comparatively narrow point of view” (“Diversity In Politics”). However, many provinces in the western region, including Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia felt alienated from the rest of Canada because as stated in Creating Canada they felt that “Ottawa neither understand nor appreciates the needs and hopes of Westerners” (74). Now, as of the May 2011 election, the politicians from the West finally have enough power to make their vision of Canada come to life (75) and provide different views on issues that can help ensure the benefit of all provinces. Thus, making political diversity a huge part of Canada’s success by providing a variety of views from the vast size of Canada that help make a good
Although Ontario generates 37% of the national GDP and is a substantial part of the North American manufacturing, (“About Ontario”) it wouldn't have been able to reach this favorable economy without the support and the advantages its …show more content…
Hence, creating the argument that Canada should separate. However, even though The North, consisting of the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, face many economic challenges such as poverty and climate change, they have an advantageous offer that exists due to the vast size and geographic variety in Canada. In other words, it's the ice sheets that have allowed The North to have its own regional and cultural diversity, such as developing a distinct way of life by having an economy that depends on working and living on frozen land and its own language, values, etc. However, the ice sheets that cover “40% of Canada’s landmass” (“The Canadian Arctic”) and is “162,000 km of Arctic coastline” (“Fisheries and Oceans Canada”) are melting as a result of climate change. Allowing massive resources in The North and Arctic to be more accessible. However, if Canada separates, these resources will be lost to competitors such as Russia. Thus, staying united will allow provinces to combine their power to obtain those resources and benefit Canada by taking advantage of those resource …show more content…
Even though, few people believe a country should have the same views and opinions to succeed, many disagree. As a result of Canada’s large size, ethnicities, races, sexes, and different people from each province bring different views on an issue that have not been previously considered. Thus, “helps ensure that no issue is examined from only one comparatively narrow point of view” (“Diversity In Politics”). However, many provinces in the western region, including Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia felt alienated from the rest of Canada because as stated in Creating Canada they felt that “Ottawa neither understand nor appreciates the needs and hopes of Westerners” (74). Now, as of the May 2011 election, the politicians from the West finally have enough power to make their vision of Canada come to life (75) and provide different views on issues that can help ensure the benefit of all provinces. Thus, making political diversity a huge part of Canada’s success by providing a variety of views from the vast size of Canada that help make a good