Argumentative Essay On Wiretapping

Improved Essays
My partner, Armando and I, both believe that the government should be allowed to obtain wiretaps on anyone whom they deem suspicious without court oversight. However, Logan and Tabitha believe the opposite and have reasons why. Those reasons include personal information about people being leaked because the court oversight were seen to be failing or ignored, and people getting very mad because the government can monitor a large portion of a certain population without them even having a single clue. The points have convinced many people that this is wrong and we need to do something about it, but they do not know the other side and why those point are wrong. Information that has been leaked has been very, very small bits of information that could not be traced back to one person easily or not even at all. The cases that have been without court oversight are cases that have been on the spot …show more content…
There is terrible things going on in the world right now that start from people's cellphones, laptops, etc. For example, people from the United States have been caught talking to ISIS about the United States and their plans about going to join ISIS. This needs to be stopped because ISIS can become a real threat if their number grow so we need to try to stop as many people as we can by joining them and giving them information about the US. Wiretapping may invade your privacy, but you have to think about what it is doing to prevent something terrible from happening. Think about September 11, 2001. Think about the awful things people went through on that day and even to now because losing a loved one or a part of you that you will never get back will never go away. If the United States has even the slightest chance of prevent something like that happening again, would you want them to carry out with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also they have invented a wiretap for busting any crimes such as planting bugs in certain rooms or chips right in the memory of your phone. This raises the question of “are we really free” or “I wonder what place doesn't have a microphone in it…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq Essay

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taking away the extra security of Americans because one is frightened, annoyed or scared of the government having access to their online conversations is unethical, concerning and unfair to…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the incident on September 11, 2001 we had an act that was passed in haste only 45 days after the attack. We had an act that was passed by George W Bush in a time of fear and unease . Even though we 're trying to protect American liberties from enemies, it is wrong to take away individual rights. One act before the patriot act was Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1968 Also called “Wiretap Statute” which restricted the government 's ability to listen to private conversation, both was controversial because it was signed in 1968 and we did not have the technology we had back then like laptops and cell phones which could be used in very bad ways to hurt or even worse kill people (Patriot)But it also could be a burden for the innocent people who have the government listen on to their private conversations which would take away their constitutional right to privacy. So too little of not listing and to much of listening in on peoples conversations is a bad thing, that 's why we should find a balance between the two so we don 't change the principles we have as a country .…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article titled, “Electronic Surveillance,” written by Cornell University states, “Obtaining a warrant for electronic surveillance requires showing probable cause, describing in particularity the conversation to be intercepted, providing a specific time period for the interception of the communications device, and noticing the property owner unless law enforcement can show exigent circumstances. As with ordinary searches and seizures, exigent circumstances may serve as grounds for law enforcement to dispense with first obtaining a warrant. If law enforcement encounters a situation threatening a person's life, a conspiracy threatening the national security, or a conspiracy suggesting organized crime, then law enforcement may proceed without first acquiring a warrant.” The U.S. has clearly been using surveillance technology unconstitutionally.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) was created by the United States Congress with the Passing of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act(FISA) of 1978. The main purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is to provide jurisdictive guidance of intelligence activities in a secure, classified setting. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is make of Federal judges that are selected by the United States Supreme Court Chief Justice. (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2017). Oversight for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is provided by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review and above them the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Do you as an American citizen ever feel like you are trapped in George Orwell’s 1984 society? Do you ever feel like the government is watching your every move, molding you into the “perfect” citizens? If so, you have the Patriot Act to thank. The United States Patriot Act is an Act set by Congress, signed by former President George W. Bush, following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, as well as the 2001 anthrax attacks. The Patriot Act is actually an acronym, standing for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.”…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By bypassing judges, the agencies have the ability to gather unnecessary information that does not pertain to their investigations. When such irrelevant private information of individuals is viewed or seized, the government is infringing upon the privacy of…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Domestic Wiretapping and Surveillance without a court order. Civilized human beings tend to discuss personal private information with each other everyday. Whether they want the information to be known or not by other people is out of their control. People conduct phone calls and texts messages with each other day in and day out. People assume that these are private one-on-one conversations with each other, but little do they know that there is a third party monitoring their conversations.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that as a nation, it is important that we remember this tragic loss made us a global superpower and that we should never forget the events that occurred on December…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They began to begin wiretapping on citizens which are when the practice of connecting a listening device to a telephone line to secretly monitor a conversation. Which is definitely an act under the Patriot Act but unfortunately is being done. It has enabled the government to reach past borders to protect its citizens like never imagined before (Mullikin, Rahman, 2010). There is an Ethical Dilemma of the USA Government Wiretapping, one side of the argument we have a loss privacy of privacy which is necessary if we are to protect our country from terrorist attacks, although on the other side, our civil liberty groups and others will argue that giving up…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Patriot Act Essay

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Over 3,000 people died as a result of these attacks. It was a terrible, horrific event. And what makes it worse is the fact that these American deaths were in vain. Because the terrorists won. This not because of the body count.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 8 – Local vs. National Authority In Chapter 8 of Thirteen American Arguments, Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority. (a) List five issues that Fineman deals with directly in the book and briefly describe how each of those issues create tension between local and national authority. Hurricane Katrina revealed a fault in American politics. Although they had predicted the dangers, neither the federal government nor the state government was in command.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No Place To Hie Snowden

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion, people should not remove their cell phone batteries or turn of their electronic devices simply because they suspect that some else is spying on them. When Eduard Snowden leaked the NSA documents in 2013, some people such as Laura Poitras who were suspected to be have any connection with him were always watched by the US Department of Homeland Security. In his book ‘No Place to Hide’, Glenn Greenwald mentions how for many times she could be detained at airports for check-ups and interrogations by the Homeland Security and her belongings could be seized from her (Greenwald, 2014, p. 11). However, as the U.S.A claims to be a democratic country, its citizens had the right to know that about programs such as PRISM, BLARNEY, FAIRVIEW,…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays