Nine Eleven was one of the most devastating events in our history, but is the official story true, or is it a plot by the U.S. government to get their country involved in a war with Iraq?
While some may have theories, others may disagree. Although no one knows what really happened, there are theories of the official story.
September 11, 2001, or otherwise known as “nineeleven” is one of the most infamous dates in our history. According to abc.news, it started after “ a group of terrorists was in the final stages of planning a series of attacks that would kill 3,000 people (Ross 1).” The terrorists, known as alQaeda, lead an organized attack on a few American landmarks, with the first two crashing the World trade center in New York, a third …show more content…
Therefore, if this were true, it would’ve taken all day for the world trade center to fall. So indeed, this theory is ridiculous, perhaps even more than the idea of the towers falling at freefall acceleration.
The freefalling towers theory is another idea that people have about nine eleven. And basically, the title pretty much explains itself: some believed the twin towers fell at freefall acceleration. But it’s wrong, because csicop.org claims, “truthers then insist that free fall acceleration indicates a complete lack of resistance(Thomas 1).” This shows the incorrectness of the theory, because it states that there wasn’t any resistance, which is needed for a freefalling
Orlando 3 collapse. And how can it fall freely without resistance? Although this theory is plausible it is still inconsistent. Yet it’s more consistent than the theory of President Bush causing nine eleven.
Nine eleven was the event that defined George W. Bush’s presidential term, but was it his own doing? Were those theories true? Of course they aren’t! According to nine eleven survivor,
William Rodriguez, “ I disagree 100%with the government story. I met with the 9/11
Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding
While some may have theories, others may disagree. Although no one knows what really happened, there are theories of the official story.
September 11, 2001, or otherwise known as “nineeleven” is one of the most infamous dates in our history. According to abc.news, it started after “ a group of terrorists was in the final stages of planning a series of attacks that would kill 3,000 people (Ross 1).” The terrorists, known as alQaeda, lead an organized attack on a few American landmarks, with the first two crashing the World trade center in New York, a third …show more content…
Therefore, if this were true, it would’ve taken all day for the world trade center to fall. So indeed, this theory is ridiculous, perhaps even more than the idea of the towers falling at freefall acceleration.
The freefalling towers theory is another idea that people have about nine eleven. And basically, the title pretty much explains itself: some believed the twin towers fell at freefall acceleration. But it’s wrong, because csicop.org claims, “truthers then insist that free fall acceleration indicates a complete lack of resistance(Thomas 1).” This shows the incorrectness of the theory, because it states that there wasn’t any resistance, which is needed for a freefalling
Orlando 3 collapse. And how can it fall freely without resistance? Although this theory is plausible it is still inconsistent. Yet it’s more consistent than the theory of President Bush causing nine eleven.
Nine eleven was the event that defined George W. Bush’s presidential term, but was it his own doing? Were those theories true? Of course they aren’t! According to nine eleven survivor,
William Rodriguez, “ I disagree 100%with the government story. I met with the 9/11
Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding