Argumentative Essay On The Nature Of Death

Improved Essays
Death Death is arguably the most cryptic topic that a person can ponder about; a phenomenon that science will probably never be able to explain, knowing that if a person has experienced death, they’ll never have their soul returned to them. Due to that fact that humanity will probably never know what the true answer is, one cannot help but ponder about what happens to our spirit after it leaves our body. That is exactly what Lucretius and Marcus Aurelius do in On the Nature of Things and Meditations, respectively. While Lucretius believes that our spirits are made of miniscule atoms, Marcus Aurelius believes that we are all limbs of God, striving to protect the perfection of the whole. Marcus Aurelius is a stoic, and therefore believes that …show more content…
Both philosophers attempt to make the very best of their lives – despite the shared opinion that the soul will cease to exist after the body gives out – in rather different ways; but the beauty of death is that there can never be a wrong answer. Lucretius, as I said before, was a hedonist. He didn’t necessarily believe that there was a purpose for life, rather his philosophy was more like “We’re stuck in this life anyways, so might as well not obtain any pain by living it and just sail through life as smoothly as possible” and it focused on finding pleasures in the simplicity of life. Therefore, his view on death wasn’t pessimistic at all, and didn’t think that fearing death was very rational. He thinks we fear death because we are so anxious about life and are obsessed with being the very best we can in life, whether that be career-wise, being a workaholic, being as popular as you can within your community, or being the richest person the world has ever known. This can all be avoided by living life very simply and not giving in to those desires, for those desires will only bring pain to …show more content…
Lucretius also states that we fear death because we will miss what is happening on Earth and we believe that the afterlife would be a very sad place. However, he argues that we don’t miss the years we missed before we were born, so why should we miss the years after we die? This also falls on his belief that the spirit does not exist once its vessel – the body – is deceased. Since the body is a material object, Lucretius believes that only a material soul would be able to control a material body, therefore the soul must be material. This is what leads Lucretius to the conclusion that the soul is made of very tiny, colorless, invisible atoms. Once the body dies, the soul dies with it and the spirit ceases to exist, feeling nothing. This is portrayed by his quote “And as for you there, slumbering in Death, you shall be free from pain and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretius’s believes that once a body is dead it should be dealt with and proposed with a proper funeral. Opposite from Socrates 's opinion, when you die that 's it, therefore you don’t need to deal with the body. Socrates would respond to Lucretius’s argument on not attending his own funeral, by stating that you should have been prepared for death your whole life; that it is the next experience and to be alive to see your death is not necessary because your soul is immortal. Lucretius’s believes that the soul doesn 't post to exist living with in the body, therefore it’s connected to the body, however in different parts. Going with the response to Socrates 's argument that the soul lives on, they would not agree.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, death itself is not experienced, and therefore it cannot be…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity. In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many people, death is one of the scariest things they will have to face. Why? Because they do not know what will happen after they die; will they go to Heaven, or will they be reincarnated? No one is, or can be, certain of what happens and arguably, this could be the main basis of religion. The question of what happens after death is a common theme expressed through many works of literature, such as Obasan by Joy Kogawa, Hamlet by William Shakespeare, “The Open Boat” by Stephen Crane, and the poem “At the River Clarion” by Mary Oliver.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus Argument Analysis

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In discussions of death, a controversial issue has been whether death is bad for the person that dies. According to Epicurus and Rosenbaum, humans should not fear death because they are unaware of their death and therefore death cannot be bad for them. According to Nagel, however, says death is bad for the person who dies because it deprives that person of all the good that life can bring them. Therefore, they disagree on whether death is implicitly bad for the person that dies. Epicurus argument goes as follows:…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death is a small, seemingly innocuous five-letter word. It is a topic that many do not like to discuss until it is absolutely necessary, while others may sit and ponder it in order to make sense of their life and purpose. Many ask themselves things such as “what will happen to me after I die?” One may think that humans are scared of dying or even say that they personally are scared of death. The uncertainty of an afterlife, or the concern over what will happen to those one leaves behind are valid concerns.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    For when a man dies, it is merely the body (the moral part) that dies, while the indestructible, deathless soul remains immortal. True, for Aristotle, the soul cannot be immortal. Yet, he has not lost the ability to distinguish between the soul and the body, by claiming the soul cannot exist without the body. The soul and the body are yet distinguishable as form and actuality, and as matter and potentiality (respectively). What Aristotle offers us that is different, is a clearer understanding of soul and body as a…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fact that nobody knows what lies ahead after death, a person cannot involve rationale in the argument of fearing death without coming out as arrogant. When Socrates lost the trial he remains rebellious in the sentencing period to result in his death sentence and he had to deal with the analogy of mortality (Plato et al 2003). He did not view death as an evil thing. As such, the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though Zhuangzi’s true thoughts on death (as on many things) are occasionally unclear and apparently contradictory (in some instances, he seems to regard death as something bad that should be avoided and a long, natural life as a positive, as is implied by the stories of Hundun and Crippled Shu [95, 61], while in most others he expresses the more accepting view of death I explore here), one view dominates throughout his work. That view is this: death is an unavoidable part of life, and we therefore should not take great pains to avoid it or worry about the fact that we will die someday (though, if that worry does happen to naturally arise, we should not actively suppress it). In the same way that where there is day there must be night, “where…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone will experience death in their lifetime. This idea is shown in The Stranger by Albert Camus. The book explains how many will recieve life out of death. Through Meursault’s observations, Camus’ The Stranger demonstrates that for Meursault to find his meaning of life, he must observe his physical surroundings.…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But based on what I believe today, I find that death secretly excites me. It is no longer some unknown void that keeps me awake at night, half curious and half afraid – but something to look forward to at the end of a life well-lived. This does not mean that I want to end my own life, because I feel very blessed to be alive with the opportunity to learn and to help others. It also doesn’t mean that I won’t grieve when others die, or that I won’t be afraid as a patient facing imminent death.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When attempting to solve the problem concerning the immortality of the soul, both Plato and Hume must rely on analogy. Plato, being a rationalist, argues that the soul is immortal and is comparable to a form, for it is invisible and incomposite, unlike material objects. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the soul is mortal and compares souls to perishable objects such as bodies. Although neither analogy can offer any validity, Hume 's argument for the mortality of the soul is far more compelling than Plato 's opposing argument.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays