However, many of the conclusions drawn by both sides are designed to endlessly throw the burden of proof around, as it is nearly impossible to prove the non-existence of a being that does not exist until we know we have seen everything. The existence of God is something that has been and will be continuously debated. The fundamental argument for atheism is that there is no evidence or proof for the existence of God, just like the fundamental argument for theism is that there is no evidence that there isn 't a God! This cyclical nature of the arguments arrises because of the lack of physical proof. We can only speculate and theorize as to what actually happened at the "beginning" of our universe. Until science unearths further proof as to the nature of our creation, we simply can 't know for sure. Another huge contrast between the atheist and theist
However, many of the conclusions drawn by both sides are designed to endlessly throw the burden of proof around, as it is nearly impossible to prove the non-existence of a being that does not exist until we know we have seen everything. The existence of God is something that has been and will be continuously debated. The fundamental argument for atheism is that there is no evidence or proof for the existence of God, just like the fundamental argument for theism is that there is no evidence that there isn 't a God! This cyclical nature of the arguments arrises because of the lack of physical proof. We can only speculate and theorize as to what actually happened at the "beginning" of our universe. Until science unearths further proof as to the nature of our creation, we simply can 't know for sure. Another huge contrast between the atheist and theist