The problem is that a ton of single-assassin theorists rely on the HSCA’s version of the SBT. As we’ve clearly seen, their version is totally at odds with the evidence and more towards a bias in desperate haste to confirm a predetermined conclusion and the government’s thesis -- a lone assassin. If its not the HSCA they rely on, they rely on subsequent “experts” of the case. Also...
Pat Speer factually points out: “While many TV shows present the single-bullet theories of Dr. Lattimer, Gerald Posner, and Dale Myers as if they are the official government theory, the theories of these men are actually at odds with both the Warren Commission and HSCA interpretations of the wounds, trajectories, and shot sequences.”
So yeah...basically Oswald did-its have it three ways. 1) The WC’s version 2) the HSCA’s version 3) the Lattimer/Posner/Myers version. The last one has become the current trending theory, but again, these people …show more content…
One of THE MOST outrageous things I’ve ever seen is …show more content…
In this simulation, performed under the guidance of wound ballistics expert Vincent J M. DiMaio (not surprisingly, a close colleague of the Clark Panel’s Dr. Fisher), the dummy’s body needed to be bent forwards in order to get the laser beam connecting the locations of Kennedy’s wounds to reach the sniper’s nest. Which version of the SBT were they using? The HSCA’s version. But here is where it gets bizarre. When talking how they had “finally got it” in “proving” the SBT, this was said on the back wound: “There’s a little given take as to where the entrance is. Because the wound wasn’t located exactly as to right or left of the midline at the time of autopsy, its just a rough
Pat Speer factually points out: “While many TV shows present the single-bullet theories of Dr. Lattimer, Gerald Posner, and Dale Myers as if they are the official government theory, the theories of these men are actually at odds with both the Warren Commission and HSCA interpretations of the wounds, trajectories, and shot sequences.”
So yeah...basically Oswald did-its have it three ways. 1) The WC’s version 2) the HSCA’s version 3) the Lattimer/Posner/Myers version. The last one has become the current trending theory, but again, these people …show more content…
One of THE MOST outrageous things I’ve ever seen is …show more content…
In this simulation, performed under the guidance of wound ballistics expert Vincent J M. DiMaio (not surprisingly, a close colleague of the Clark Panel’s Dr. Fisher), the dummy’s body needed to be bent forwards in order to get the laser beam connecting the locations of Kennedy’s wounds to reach the sniper’s nest. Which version of the SBT were they using? The HSCA’s version. But here is where it gets bizarre. When talking how they had “finally got it” in “proving” the SBT, this was said on the back wound: “There’s a little given take as to where the entrance is. Because the wound wasn’t located exactly as to right or left of the midline at the time of autopsy, its just a rough