Argumentative Essay On Science Vs Religion

Improved Essays
Drawing negative comparisons between science and religion we can say both have created war, starvation, and even disease in societies. germ warfare, atomic weapons, and toxic GMO foods is the flip side of the coin. So, to trust science blindly because we need an alternative to religion is not a good either, we must find a balance. Science like religion is a way of understanding the world around us and how it operates. Science has given us definitive answers and truths about our world such as the laws of physics, and the big bang theory; the origin of our universe and where we all come from. A less interpretable medium once a concrete enough answer has been found. The findings are referred to as theory and not doctrine or laws by which to live your life, but rather plausible ideas that explain our environment until another superior theory is found. Science rarely has laws and the laws themselves are still up for being rewritten due to the ever changing nature and exploration, at sciences core it 's a beautiful thing to behold.
The issue plagues our political theatre as the appointees in charge of our EPA etc. can be selected from
…show more content…
Science can be exploited for financial gain or political power as said in the aforementioned paragraph. So, what if a middle ground where to be found.
“It’s presents with extreme clarity what are the different realms of religion (values) and science (facts) and also their connections. This cross-fertilization becomes problematic only when each realm wants to impose itself on the other or when a religion with an anthropomorphized God is behind every event. This would eliminate personal responsibility and install the priests of the religion as more capable of deciding between truth and falsehood. This would deprive religion of any value and would limit science in its research for truth” (AE Science and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Karellen, they fear that the Overlords know the truth about their beliefs and will tear them apart. “We represent reason and science, and, however confident they may be in their beliefs, they fear that we will overthrow their gods.” In the novel, science dominates religion, the Overlords are too advanced and have been studying mankind for a long time. The world’s religions are scared that Karellen will reveal something that will make their religions seem like a lie, whether the Overlords actually know it or not. The fact that the Overlords are more advanced and might have witnessed these events happening creates fear. Clarke showcases the conflict between science and religion using Stormgren and Karellen in this case to represent the scientific side and Wainwright to represent the religious side.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason for denial, Keith B. Miller says, is that the scientific concession on climate change “is often rejected because of a perception that the majority is driven by social, political, or religious motives” (220). Because the social world is driven by these factors many believe that the scientific world is as well. While scientists are human and are not immune to ulterior motives, the intense verification process that studies go through insure accurate unbiased…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barash and Webel also point out that we are all so preoccupied with the millions of other issues present in the world that we ignore the steady rise of this extremely destructive weapon, and the governments that are discussing its use . From a different, yet equally as important perspective arises from an environmental protection advocators standpoint. Not only considering if nuclear weaponry is moral for the inhabitants of the earth, environmentalist are also looking at the catastrophic, non-reversible damage done to the planet itself . This perspective brings forth an entirely new way of looking and judging the morality of nuclear warfare. With nuclear waste lasting…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Geo Engineering Problems

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If there was a way to certainly know how the planet would respond to the methods and applications of geo-engineering, then perhaps then there could be a real scientific talk about it. However, the repercussions of spraying the stratosphere will be worldwide and uncontainable. The normal scientific procedure for any type of new technology is to test the hypothesis, collect data, reform the hypothesis and retest until the desired result is achieved the minimal negative “side effects”. The problem with geo-engineering is that the only way of testing it, is to just do it and hope for the best. The lives of not only humans are at stake when experimenting with the planet, every living organism and ecosystem will have to deal with the possible irreversible consequences of these experiments.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wendell Berry argues against this strict fundamentalism in his essay, “God, Science, and Imagination”, where he discusses that reaching a balance between the two extremes of science and religion is important to eliminate the bigotry the world faces. Zadie…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would the major theory maintained by the Aristotle anticipate the view of Copernicus? At the time, the theory was controlled by science and religion. This is the hazard of disagreeing with a method, which logically criticizes the kind of creative inventiveness and freethinking of the extensive list of Copernicus and Galileo. Maybe it is time to scrap such disagreements for normal science and theories. Maybe it is time for experts to guide by recognizable proofs and open thinking (Bronowsk, J.,…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since the nuclear weapons have been invented, the effects of nuclear weapons on the causes of war have been profound. People usually tend to believe that nuclear weapons are bad and should never have been invented in the first place. It makes sense, because people fear the tremendous destructive power of nuclear weapons. However, there are also positive effects of this very devastating power on the causes of war. This is because of the concept of MAD, or Mutually Assured Destruction.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Religious leaders started to worry that as science progressed, its discoveries would discredit the Lord. Thus, a misunderstanding of science arose. In reality, science answers the “important” questions of life while religion deals with the “hard” question. Important questions such as “what does it take to sustain life?” are different from hard questions like “what is the purpose of life?” Science can provide information which can be used to help make a decision but frequently cannot tell you what to decide. Humans have spiritual needs that can be dealt by religion but not by science.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Science coming from the Latin word Scientia, meaning “knowledge,” is a systematic structure that builds and organizes knowledge from testable explanations and predictions about the universe. The nature of scientific progress and the rationality of scientific change lies between Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn. The two prominent philosophers of the 20th century had very distinct viewpoints of science which led to countless debates. One of them, which I believe to be the most intriguing, was the scientific method and the idea of there even being one. The traditional understanding of the scientific method, described since the ancient Greeks, was to look at the world with a scientific eye and observe it with no other preconceived notions.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science focuses on the hard facts while religion is based on the ideas and beliefs. We all have our own opinions and beliefs about science and religion in America. In the Philosophy of Science and Religion, they are incompatible with each other, since science focuses more on the visible world while religion focuses more on the invisible world. As a student, it was mandatory to take science through our education system, in order to graduation from school or college. In Karl R. Popper’s “Science as Falsification”, the purpose of the article was to distinguish between “science” and “pseudoscience.” This was also known as the “problem of demarcation” that Popper wants to point out.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays