Argumentative Essay On Science Vs Religion

Improved Essays
Drawing negative comparisons between science and religion we can say both have created war, starvation, and even disease in societies. germ warfare, atomic weapons, and toxic GMO foods is the flip side of the coin. So, to trust science blindly because we need an alternative to religion is not a good either, we must find a balance. Science like religion is a way of understanding the world around us and how it operates. Science has given us definitive answers and truths about our world such as the laws of physics, and the big bang theory; the origin of our universe and where we all come from. A less interpretable medium once a concrete enough answer has been found. The findings are referred to as theory and not doctrine or laws by which to live your life, but rather plausible ideas that explain our environment until another superior theory is found. Science rarely has laws and the laws themselves are still up for being rewritten due to the ever changing nature and exploration, at sciences core it 's a beautiful thing to behold.
The issue plagues our political theatre as the appointees in charge of our EPA etc. can be selected from
…show more content…
Science can be exploited for financial gain or political power as said in the aforementioned paragraph. So, what if a middle ground where to be found.
“It’s presents with extreme clarity what are the different realms of religion (values) and science (facts) and also their connections. This cross-fertilization becomes problematic only when each realm wants to impose itself on the other or when a religion with an anthropomorphized God is behind every event. This would eliminate personal responsibility and install the priests of the religion as more capable of deciding between truth and falsehood. This would deprive religion of any value and would limit science in its research for truth” (AE Science and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For centuries, religion has been a topic of great debate and interest, stemming from the validity of ideals to reasons why people believe in it in the first place. Despite all the efforts over time to thwart religion, it has managed to remain as a prominent structure. One question that seems to always be brought to the table is how religion continues to exist in light of the continual advances of science. The reason religion continues to exist today is not because the furthering of science leads to disproving religion, but rather because religion addresses questions that currently not even the advances of science can answer, giving people a sense of unity and congregation based upon two key emotions: hope and fear.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the motto of the World State is ‘Community, Identity and Stability’. This utopia desires to be a world where pain and suffering are eliminated for all citizens, but pleasure is perpetual. Consequently, this unknowingly ceases the freedom of the citizens of the World State. Ultimately, citizens of Brave New World’s society are in a constant state of imprisonment due to their inability to feel unhappy. Brave New World focuses on how happiness and truth cannot coexist through the use of soma, the use of science, and the theme of isolation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern day, science seems to (or sometimes attempts to) trump the Christian Bible in every way for some. It’s as if modern science can’t see similarities or agreements between the two, so one must choose one or the other. In John H. Walton’s “Human Origins and The Bible,” he explains that the Bible does not contain any kind of “scientific revelation” and whatever science is within the Bible would have been general knowledge for everyone. But in our present day of the 21st century, many feel that science and the Bible must work together somehow, but with all of the answers science is providing, it feels like an attack on our beliefs.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dalai Lama Analysis

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ideally, the more we learn, the more we know. However, when it comes to the unknown, we tend to look for answers that can be both proven and explained in a way we can comprehend. This is why it is common for people turn to science to answer many questions we encounter in our lives. However, the major flaw with science comes from the fact that it…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind”-Einstein. I am energised by the debates that are sparked by statements like this and this is where my love of philosophy has flourished; studying reason and argument at university is a natural and exciting progression for me. Philosophy and Ethics A level has encouraged me to build up my views as an individual, specifically exploring the Christian perspective of debates and how they contrast with other beliefs. to do this, I have read books such as ‘God’s Undertaker’ by John Lennox which takes a logical approach to understanding and opposing common arguments put forward by atheists such as Dawkins.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example that shows how religion and science are different, but work together is the snow leopard. GS was the only one to see the snow leopard on this expedition while Matthiessen did not (Matthiessen 315). In science, people like cold hard facts and evidence while in religion, people simply believe. Nonetheless, both GS and Matthiessen’s lives have been changed, but not because they saw the snow leopard or failed too, but because they went on an amazing journey. Religion and science may be different, but what is important about them and what bring them together is that they do have a significant impact on people’s lives, the way they think, and the way they live.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some things are beyond scientific evolution and cannot even begin to be explained, such as proof of God’s existence or how humans were brought about. Science can provide man with physical wholeness. Through gaining scientific evidence, mankind feels that they have gained more knowledge about the world around them. On the other hand, religion alone can fulfill spiritual needs, it is a social phenomenon as well as personal and individual one. Religion fulfills our spiritual needs by giving us internal reassurance that after death our spirits will carry on in the afterlife.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compatibility of Science and Christianity Do you believe that science and Christianity are compatible? If you aren't quite sure, this essay will help you to decide for yourself, as it includes the history of both science and Christianity, where science and Christianity stand alone from one another, and evidence of the compatibility of science and Christianity. “In order to analyze the relationship between science and religion, we need to define and characterize each domain. Many consider that religion offers a special kind of higher spiritual truth. They maintain that there are two truths: (1) the truths of science, employing the methods of scientific inquiry, and testing claims empirically, rationally, and experimentally; and (2) the…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does science mean to you? To me, science is everything. Not only is it the normal biology or psychology, it is everything that surrounds us, or is in us, even the things we ourselves do not know about. The Webster definition is “a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws” which for me that definition encompasses everything we know and learn every day.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, science and religion are incompatible, since they believe in different truths in the world; science more about the material world while religion focuses on the invisible…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though today this argument between science and religion is often seen today as something of the past and something that is now very trivial, the divide between these two systems of beliefs is more prevalent we know. This divide is affecting not only the education that people in America and around the world are receiving, but the care they are receiving in contrast with the care that they deserve, and the knowledge they are willing to accept, along with the diversity that surrounds them everyday. The fact that this divide is no longer given much attention can have serious consequences in terms of the quality of life of all individuals in societies all around the world. It could very well be true that efforts towards bringing together the concepts of science and religion, whether it be by creating efforts to connect the two or creating efforts in order to let them harmoniously coexist, could be a determining factor of the success of not only society as it exists today but also of the generations that have yet to…

    • 1371 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science is completely about inquiry and with that said, nothing supernatural can ever be proven. Although science is very powerful in how we interpret our beliefs, it is entirely up to the individual on how they want to perceive the information that is relayed to them. Like I said before, scientist are not responsible for how we use their findings. I like to think of it as some research being an act of temptation from God to know what is right and what is wrong, especially when talking about how we came about this earth and the whole topic of evolution. Overall, I think the moral concept involved in science is important because it influences us to be more rational about our moral speculations and overall…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Science Can Help Religion Benefit Society. June 2005, “This new understanding can help give us a new grasp of (1) the basic nature of religion, (2) the basic principles of major world religious traditions, and (3) the basic principles of religious ethics.” Conclusion I. Signal End: To sum up, it it’s a best benefit to save all people from wars and to let them together in everywhere.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion answered these questions with make-believe stories of gods and goddesses and other ‘supernatural forces’ beyond human understanding. Science is able to explain these ‘supernatural forces’ with proof and evidence. Science and religion have always been at war. Science is based on observation and what we can explain using formulae and theorem. Religious arguments on the other hand, are questionable in nature and require faith.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays