Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Improved Essays
What usually comes to mind when you hear the words nuclear weapons yes an extremely huge explosion that has a capacity to wipe out an entire island and everything else in it. Although they are often associated with death and devastation nuclear weapons have a good side surprise surprise but the majority still believe nuclear weapons should be deactivated and hidden away where no one can have access to them.
A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that goes off because of nuclear reactions- fission fusion, or when two energy released causes an explosion. One of the most destructive display of nuclear weapons was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. It was in the event that people fully understand the strength and power
…show more content…
10,000 warheads are in military service, while the rest is awaiting dismantlement. A nuclear arms state is less likely to be attacked by another nation even when it is equipped with nuclear weapons of their own. this comes from the fact that a good defense allows a nation to protect themselves well and to retaliate just as well. This results in more peacetime and any conflict would have to be resolved first diplomatic talks instead of an all out war.
Negotiation becomes the first weapon of choice
As previously mentioned, other nations would think twice before launching an attack on a nuclear-armed country. So when there are conflicts that need to be re solved both nations would first resort to negotiating to reach an agreement or compromise as a way to avoid massive destruction. this helps guarantee peace for as long as possible. Nations without nuclear weapons would also prefer to talk first before firing weapons of any kind. In fact nuclear weapons are considered low cost insurance against possible aggression, particularly from large

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    There is no absolutely safe defense against a nuclear bomb, so as shown through history, nuclear weapons are their own deterrents. To stop wars, nuclear weapons, such as atomic bombs, were used, but in order for the enemy to combat those weapons, they had to develop nuclear armaments themselves, which creates a cycle where the production of weapons instigates the production of more weapons16. This led to the situation in the 2000s when there were, “[…] 32,000 nuclear bombs possessed by eight nations containing 5,000 megatons of destructive energy. This is a global arsenal more than sufficient to destroy the world”17. It was only after the cold war, when the Soviet Union and the United States of America were competing to develop more and more deadly weapons in larger quantities, did countries realize that there was no need for all of the weapons they had created, and thus agreed to limit themselves to only enough weapons to eliminate the enemy.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one state were to rely on another for its security and defense, that state would not be sovereign and autonomous, but dependent upon the protector state. However, in order for states to maintain their sovereignty and autonomy, as well as achieve security, they strive to reach nuclear capability. Nuclear capability is an attractive trait to states because it is the ultimate tool in the arsenal of deterrence. Although there is no way to effective way to prevent a state from achieving nuclear capability, it is still pursed. For instance, the United States is in the mist of preventing Iran from reaching nuclear capability.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War Vs Ww2 Dbq

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Document #5 highlights this showing the U.S and the USSR in the lead of how many Nuclear tests each performed from 1945-2016 with the U.S at 1,030 and the USSR at 715. Based on these statistics we can infer that the nuclear tests were not only to assess the power of the weapon, but threaten other nations, much like the U.S sending a rocket the moon. These specific threats were really emphasizing and showing that unspoken tension between the two nations during the cold war. Nuclear tests due to this event now have a new meaning in the world's eyes and ultimately that increases the likelihood of conflict between nations. North Korea for example has had Nuclear tests in both 2016 and now 2017 as of late according to document #5, and because of the cold war this seems like a threat.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last century and a half, technological advancements have transformed American life at an unprecedented rate. The most significant effect these technologies have had on the U.S., and the rest of the world, is an increase of opportunity and influence. While technological achievements are often remembered for their improvements to American and global life, these same innovations have a history of bringing about a proportional amount of detriment to the world, although this comparable shift in scale often goes unnoticed. For instance, where medicines and vaccinations have become more refined and accessible, weaponized diseases and synthetic toxins have seen similar growth in their efficiency and availability. Understanding this technologically…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite years of economic downfall and heavy reliance on Russia and China, North Korea still remains one of the most militaristic societies in the world. North Korea has staked everything they have on their nuclear program, their money, their people, and their relations with the international community. North Korea is a product of the idea that a country can only be safe when it possess a nuclear arsenal, we made this idea come into the world when we dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, however justified we were (“No Exit”). Israel is another example of a country that questionably has nuclear weapons. In his book: “The Golem” , Michael Collins Piper dissects how exactly Israel 's possession of nuclear weapons is a threat to not only to world peace but also to itself.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Atomic bomb is a very destructive weapon that can obliterate anything in a 5 mile radius. This device had been developed in a project over the past few years starting in 1939 which was known as the Manhattan project. During the project over 100,000 people were employed and scientists from various nations contributed their work towards creating the bomb. Finally on July 16, 1945, it was tested in the Trinity test in central New Mexico. While this test was a success, the struggle with Japan and relations with the USSR were still present for the U.S. which led Truman to decide on the Atomic bomb usage.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atomic bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki (“Little Boy and “Fat Man”) killed a total of roughly 100-110 thousand people. There were more deaths than needed. The U.S. did not inform Japan of the bombing so that the women and children could escape. The U.S. should not have used atomic bombs against Japan to end World War II.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (U.S. Department of State< state.gov>) The nations made sure that they could defend themselves from the destruction that nuclear weapons could cause. Also the nuclear bombs make the area where they are used unsuitable for people afterwards.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear arms would play a vital role in the following Cold War. They were a cause of the cold war. They were a tool to threaten rival nations. And finally, they served as the deterrent that prevented the Cold War from becoming World War 3. Nuclear arms served as a cause of the Cold War.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even with discontinuance of the cold war, military continues to develop; this has lapsed the spending especially in the deployment of nuclear-armed and ballistic missiles along with defensive systems. Due to the fact that there was no formalized treaty ending the Cold War, the former influential nations have continued to desperate lengths. This caused them to depend on their economies to maintain and push to improve, even modify existing nuclear weapons. Many states had taken into consideration the potential risk to national and international security, which pushed them to acknowledge nuclear-weapons states had inherited major responsibilities in protecting sustaining the balance of their nuclear forces. To elaborate on risks, there are accidental and unauthorized nuclear havoc which not only puts the military in danger it puts civilians into that category as well.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays