Nuclear War Research Paper

Improved Essays
Nuclear War Julius Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb, was quoted saying “Now I have become Death, destroyer of worlds.” This was his response after witnessing the first atomic bomb being detonated. Nuclear war is a serious threat to our way of life. The criteria for something to be a serious threat to our way of life are the likelihood, the consequences, and the lack of preparation. Nuclear war is a serious threat because of its likelihood. Nuclear war has a high possibility of happening. The invention of the atomic bomb completely changed and some say revolutionized war and death tolls. One “nuke” has the potential to do much more damage than a conventional bomb. Not only does the nuke do damage like a bomb would …show more content…
Nuclear weapons have been attached to missiles. And with the push of a button can be shot off to anywhere in the world. Not only do they work as traditional bombs they also release radiation. This radiation is absorbed into the ground after detonation. Then the radiated soil is propelled into the air. This is called fallout. There have been many instances where fallout has happened after a nuclear explosion and has had adverse effects not only on people but the environment. If contact is with humans burns and radiation poisoning occurs. The fallout can be lifted up into the Jetstream and carried off many of miles away from the explosion. It can then be deposited into the ecosystem for animals and plants to absorb, which further spreads the radiation. Anyone who survives the initial slaughter that will happen if a nuclear war would start, would have to deal with what is left. Large craters would be left wherever a nuclear weapon made impact. Areas around the crater would be uninhabitable for years upon years. Radiation would plague the area. Animal and plant life would mutate or die. The radiation would make helping victims very hard. Another consequence would be the tension between countries that had fired nuclear weapons against each other. If a nuclear weapon were to hit key economic or political areas then… Any government building or area of commerce devastated by the destruction would be unable to run …show more content…
Not much can be done or has been done to prepare for a nuclear war. Yes, bunkers have been build, but they are few and far between. They are not readily and easily accessible to everyone. If a nuclear war were to happen there are no guidelines to follow. There are no set things to do by the government. One may say that if we eliminate all nuclear weapons, then the threat of nuclear war is nonexistent. This is a valid point, except that countries have been hiding and secretly keeping the number of nuclear weapons they have for years and still are. Also to get every country in the world to comply to such a mandate would be nearly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There is no absolutely safe defense against a nuclear bomb, so as shown through history, nuclear weapons are their own deterrents. To stop wars, nuclear weapons, such as atomic bombs, were used, but in order for the enemy to combat those weapons, they had to develop nuclear armaments themselves, which creates a cycle where the production of weapons instigates the production of more weapons16. This led to the situation in the 2000s when there were, “[…] 32,000 nuclear bombs possessed by eight nations containing 5,000 megatons of destructive energy. This is a global arsenal more than sufficient to destroy the world”17. It was only after the cold war, when the Soviet Union and the United States of America were competing to develop more and more deadly weapons in larger quantities, did countries realize that there was no need for all of the weapons they had created, and thus agreed to limit themselves to only enough weapons to eliminate the enemy.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kenneth Rose’s book One Nation Underground thoroughly analyzes America’s view about the Cold War and considerations for nuclear fallout shelters. The Cold War had many effects on American people. With the nuclear arms race approaching and America not being able to catch up to the Soviet Union, American people began to wonder what was in store for them in the coming future. This time period brought mixed views about what needs to be done to protect the United States from nuclear warfare as well as characteristics of ignorance, unpreparedness, and fear from Americans that lead to the preparedness for nuclear attack. Mixed views about types of civil defense that needed to take place during this time were very controversial.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the world saw how much destruction was caused by a single atomic bomb, international politics were revolutionized. Wars could not be waged so easily since the threat of a nuclear strike too overwhelming. This thwarted any nuclear power from attacking another, which led to them fighting proxy wars with each other, unlike the major wars that had devastated the…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why nuclear bombs haven’t been used since World War II is because it’s expensive making nuclear bombs. The United States have weapons with unbelievable destructive power. Nuclear bombs are so deadly that it has the ability to destroy places and kill people that are far away in only minutes. Nuclear weapons are deadly weapons.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power provides clean, safe, and efficient energy, but a very similar negligence that resulted in the infamous Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire caused the malfunctioning of a nuclear reactor in Fukushima, Japan and resulted in the irradiation of entire cities, as opposed to the burning of a single building. Nuclear weapons punctuated the end of World War II with the bombing of Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, bringing unforeseen catastrophe and annihilation to an entire culture and acting as a testament to how war would be applied to the same amplifications the rest of the world were subjected to. Paying mind to this shift in magnitude eventually led to the M.A.D. policies of the Cold War, where nations participated in a familiar arms race applied to new nuclear powers, introducing the possibility of obliteration of all life on earth that remains present in every American mind to this…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bomb also created environmental issues. Dilemmas that many scientists had claimed would have happened if the bomb was dropped. The bomb caused radiation that had a long term effects on the people. Several thousands of people died because of the exposure of chemicals the nuclear bomb consisted of. Even several days after the bomb the was dropped.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arms Race Research Paper

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Later in History, the first biggest arms race started between the European Nations prior to World War I. Professor Brose of history and politics at Drexel University has said that the arms race of new weapons played a big role in the causes of World War I, “Especially evident in these tables, however, is the behind-the-scenes “quiet” arms race: the consistently more rapid annual increase of new weapon expenditures in the inflation-free environment of pre-1914,” (Brose). When the European nations were putting more research into the military, they began to create new weapons of death. This caused tensions to rise between the neighbors of these European nations because they did not want to be left behind in the technological advancements in the…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. ”1 This statement was made by Robert Oppenheimer after the first successful atomic bomb test at Los Alamos, New Mexico. At approximately 08:15 AM on 6 August 1945, the way in which states viewed conflict was forever changed in a dramatic fashion. On that day a US B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, killing around 80,000 people instantly.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People had threatened war in the past to get what they wanted. Hitler threatened Czechoslovakians with war if they didn’t concede territory to the Third Reich. But nuclear weapons allowed one nation to threaten another with the prospect of death to the majority of their citizens, and the irradiation of their land; thus making it uninhabitable. Nikita Khrushchev is the first name to come to mind for nuclear threats. He did this many times.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is nuclear deterrence? According to the freedictionary.com it is the military doctrine that an enemy will be discouraged from using nuclear weapons as long as he can be destroyed as a consequence; "when two nations both resort to nuclear deterrence the consequence could be mutual destruction". In Futter’s book he says that “for nuclear deterrence to work, the nuclear-armed state must be credible in both its intention and ability to use nuclear weapons as retribution for an attack”.(Futter 71) Nuclear deterrence to some may be the reason to get rid of nuclear weapons all together. Since no one will use the weapons why have those around? This is a great question to ask, and a logical at that.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    America needs to continue to Defend the safety of Israel Imagine being in a country no smaller than the state of New Jersey where you are surrounded by enemies on all sides of your borders. These enemies pose a serious threat because they have a hate that cuts deep to the bone. They actively yearn to kill you. Their hate doesn’t end there; it extends to any outside country that is a friend. "Death to you" is their call.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even with discontinuance of the cold war, military continues to develop; this has lapsed the spending especially in the deployment of nuclear-armed and ballistic missiles along with defensive systems. Due to the fact that there was no formalized treaty ending the Cold War, the former influential nations have continued to desperate lengths. This caused them to depend on their economies to maintain and push to improve, even modify existing nuclear weapons. Many states had taken into consideration the potential risk to national and international security, which pushed them to acknowledge nuclear-weapons states had inherited major responsibilities in protecting sustaining the balance of their nuclear forces. To elaborate on risks, there are accidental and unauthorized nuclear havoc which not only puts the military in danger it puts civilians into that category as well.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is sad that people think that something that could wipe out the entire human race, and even blow up the planet seven times, is what will protect us. It is better to feel safe if there are no nuclear weapons in the world, like what the CCC 2315 says, creating more bombs is not going to create peace. Power is not worth having if it is going to potentially destroy innocent lives and military strategy for nuclear weapon use will be unnecessary if nukes did not exist. Nuclear weapons will be unnecessary if people weren’t so hungry for power and protection. The world will be a much better place without something that can wipe the human…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics