The Employment Policies Institute …show more content…
The arguments they made and theories provided, where all substantiated by the evidence so it was sound. However, the economic background of the members of this group and the type of economist they are, did play a huge role in the interpretation of the data. For instance, a labor economist may have interpreted this argument different than a public finance economist. However, this potential bias did not create a huge concern unlike the group of articles that pushed for the increase in minimum wage did.
The increase in minimum wage has only been supported by non-profit organizations and groups of uncredited, biased individuals. Each argument was just a rebuttal to the popular negative viewpoint of the increase in minimum wage, and was unsupported by any evidence that fell on the same federal policy scale. There were also many stories of what these low-income families are facing, and arguing that we need need to help. This completely sidetracks from the intended goal of pushing for its