All States Should Legalize Euthanasia

Decent Essays
Legalizing Euthanasia “We control our entry into life, it is time we began to control our exit.” - Max Frisch. Euthanasia is a highly controversial debate all around the globe. Opponents argue that using euthanasia to end one’s life is morally erroneous and believe it violates the principles of medicine; proponents believe euthanasia is a considerate way to end the suffering of terminally ill people. With the legalization of euthanasia, many benefits could be added to this country. Bountiful amounts of people with incurable diseases will not have to live in the horrible pain that comes with their disease, current laws will not target these innocent people, and this country will become a better and happier place overall. These reasons prove that euthanasia can bring lots of positive benefits into this country and rights to the citizens in it; therefore, more states should realize this and legalize euthanasia. The debate on euthanasia dates back to the …show more content…
The benefits euthanasia could add are: many amounts of people with diseases that are terminal will not be forced to stay alive with the horrible pain their disease causes, laws in effect right now will not be aimed at these people, and this nation will evolve into a more positive, and better place altogether. Opponents still argue that utilizing euthanasia to terminate one’s life is morally misguided and euthanasia violates the ethics of medicine; proponents believe that assisted suicide is a sympathetic way to stop the pain of the terminally ill. The debate is prominent in America, and it is time that the government realize the pros of euthanasia and legalize it for the good of this country and its citizens. “We control our entry into life, it is time we began to control our exit.” - Max

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia’s injection could have a cure that could be used within a couple of hours it was injected in order to reverse the hastened death. People supporting it want the freedom of choice and control, however, those who do not support it believe if you change your mind and want to live longer you are denied freedom and control. So this cure would change this perspective. There is also the issue of whether or not people really need euthanasia. For example people who are in the early stages of the disease experience minor pain, such pain is common to regular disease and it would be immoral of them to take their life.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    C. Thesis: It is necessary that all terminally ill patients or individuals in chronic severe pain have the option of a peaceful and quick death to minimize suffering. D. Preview: I will address the arguments opposed to euthanasia. First, I will discuss why the slippery slope argument is a fallacy, why proper pain management is not good enough for those who are in constant severe pain, why legalizing euthanasia will not undermine important health care and medical services, and the reasons why the legitimization of euthanasia by omission is not enough. Transition: Laws legalizing euthanasia will not create a slippery slope, but keep it under control so it is properly regulated for those involved.) I. Legalizing assisted suicide will not lead to legalizing involuntary euthanasia.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dignity Vs Euthanasia

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As doctors are making better medicine hopefully these deadly diseases go away, but until then it should be a right to the patients to end it on their terms. Shown on polls mostly everywhere, citizens believe that the assisted suicide for terminally ill should be allowed. Euthanasia may be quite controversial, but a patient who has rights in the United States, should have this right regardless of what others…

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Callahan feels that the law misleads the patient to feel they have autonomy thinking that the active euthanasia will help them reach the good life. The third point put pressure of the medical professional to achieve what the patient thinks is the good life. This point makes a patient think, escaping from personal life that is causing suffering instead of the pain from the sick of the body. Callahan feels that active euthanasia has no justifiable reason on why it would be right to legalize killing one another. Callahan objects to Rachels and Brock’s arguments for euthanasia.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Debate Of Euthanasia

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To Euthanize? Whether it’s your hand or Time’s hand that ends the person/patient’s life, they still die. Ending life early is a very controversial subject because of how difficult it is for some to speak about it, especially if they’ve had to live though that experience. Some believe that Human life is sacred, and shouldn’t be wasted. Others believe that euthanasia can be justified because the current rules holding back euthanasia no longer apply with advanced medicine and ease suffering.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    O’Neill also argues that making euthanasia legal would replace “love with law”. If it is legalized, euthanasia can no longer be considered mercy killing. It would replace a decision that should be made with the consultation of family and doctors with one that is monitored by the government and death-sanctioning lawyers. Ultimately, a government does not care about the patient’s life, adding them into the equation would diminish the love and compassion a terminally ill patient should feel at the end of their life. Legalizing euthanasia would only cause more pain as it would introduce more unneeded stress to the patient.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Opponents of euthanasia say that euthanasia enhances the power and control of doctors, not patients” (Life Information 2). It would make more sense for the patient to have more power especially since they are the ones with their lives on the line. We should not force people who are suffering to live in misery. The law should allow patients to choose what they believe is best for themselves. “A state 's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained” (ACLU Amicus Brief in Vacco v. Quill).…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is an issue with no set boundaries or barriers. In some cases, like Robert Litamer and Sue Rodriguez there are beneficial consequences to helping a person end their life, but there are too many situations that differ in detail to provide one law to allow active euthanasia. A utilitarian approach states that it is a duty to increase happiness, and decrease pain, for the greatest amount of people, which in some cases may fit, morally, but eventually, our morals and ethics will be lost if we do not control this act of aiding suicide. The consequences are too ambiguous to legalized active…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, this is inconsistent and falls short of the argument Brockney 3 that promotes euthanasia as a choice all who desire should be allowed. Another potential slippery- slope aspect of allowing euthanasia that is pragmatic is the possibility of laziness. It is widely known that it is within human nature to fall short of expectations at some point. A physician could begin by diligently ensuring that all euthanasia cases are taken care of precisely and carefully, yet, this diligence could eventually become lacking and a patient who does not meet the necessary requirements could lose their life (Lo 154). Opponents of euthanasia claim that euthanasia defies the sanctity of life and the…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays