Everyone has a different opinion on how people should protest. Some say peaceful, violence, or not to protest at all. But either way, there's always going to be someone that's going to disagree with that opinion. If the Government is taking advantage of the power that they have, the people should protest peacefully, if that doesn’t work; they should use violence. Which would the citizens most likely be persuaded with peace or violence. Most people would choose the peaceful option, they wouldn’t like to burn people's house down. The Black citizens in Selma, Alabama weren’t getting the voting rights that the fifteenth amendment said that they would. They were able to vote, but they had to go through so many tests and procedures that made it
…show more content…
That didn’t work at all, the King most likely laughed at them for putting the idea out on the table. The colonist wrote a pledge letter which was basically an agreement for them both. They’ve probably sent the same thing over hundred times and the king kept on saying no and putting even more acts on them. The peaceful way doesn’t always work, some people react better with violence. Once the colonists started boycotting, burning people's houses, and breaking British property. That actually got a reaction out of the king that they wanted, it started to make the King think twice about what he was …show more content…
Women has always been downgraded from men. Women should always stay at home and take of the kids, women should be lady like, women shouldn’t have jobs, women shouldn’t be wearing the pants in the relationship. Once World War 1 started, and the men were being drafted to war. Women needed to get jobs to bring the money in for the house. Ever since then, women were saying, “Whatever men could do, Women could do it too or even better”. Once the men came back from the War, they expected the Women to go back the way it was, them being inside the kitchen. They didn’t like that idea so they protested in a peaceful way, the government did listen to them but it took
That didn’t work at all, the King most likely laughed at them for putting the idea out on the table. The colonist wrote a pledge letter which was basically an agreement for them both. They’ve probably sent the same thing over hundred times and the king kept on saying no and putting even more acts on them. The peaceful way doesn’t always work, some people react better with violence. Once the colonists started boycotting, burning people's houses, and breaking British property. That actually got a reaction out of the king that they wanted, it started to make the King think twice about what he was …show more content…
Women has always been downgraded from men. Women should always stay at home and take of the kids, women should be lady like, women shouldn’t have jobs, women shouldn’t be wearing the pants in the relationship. Once World War 1 started, and the men were being drafted to war. Women needed to get jobs to bring the money in for the house. Ever since then, women were saying, “Whatever men could do, Women could do it too or even better”. Once the men came back from the War, they expected the Women to go back the way it was, them being inside the kitchen. They didn’t like that idea so they protested in a peaceful way, the government did listen to them but it took