Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

Improved Essays
The 2nd Amendment, the Right to Bear Arms, was made on December 15, 1791, granting Americans the right to legally own and carry a firearm. The amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” People all around the United States have been expressing their opinion on all the issues regarding the 2nd Amendment. So ask yourself the question, would better gun control save our country?
Militia, in the time of the Revolutionary War, were groups of white men who came together to protect whatever land they had. For example, communities, towns, colonies, and the soon-to-be states. Once the militia’s started to question whether or not they would legally be able to keep their firearms, James Madison brought the issue to discussion, creating the 2nd Amendment which satisfied mens wants or needs for guns.
Over time, this amendment has been challenged and changed because of the problems it can and has brought. One change to the 2nd Amendment over the years is that men or women can no longer carry firearms or guns in Washington D.C. if lacking a license. Handguns were also generally banned if unregistered
…show more content…
Heller. This case took place on June 6th, 2008. It involved police chief, Dick Heller, and the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia made it illegal to personally own any firearm or gun, Heller didn’t agree with this for the fact that he was a police officer and chief who was legally able to carry and own a gun when on duty, as well as the fact that he wanted one at home for safety and protection towards him and his loved ones. The District immediately denied his registration which Heller claimed was going against the 2nd Amendment and his right as a man. The court lost to Heller with a 5-4 Heller’s supporters being, Chief Justice Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kennedy and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in the Constitution. There have been several cases where the Amendment has been challenged. As the world keeps growing and developing, the amendments have stayed the same since the creation in 1789. Therefore, as the years go by the original meaning of the text is getting lost in translation, which has caused the Supreme Court Justices to try to interpret the meaning the best way they can to ensure a fair trial.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Later the Court of Appeals reversed and directed the court. They later ruled it unconstitutional, to have a total ban on handguns, which violates the second amendment. Regulations on how to store your gun is inappropriate. The point of owning a gun, is self-defense. How are you supposed to defend yourself if your gun is unloaded, bounded, and disassembled?…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heller. In this case, the problem was that after the District of Columbia passed legislation including the registration of handguns, requiring licenses for pistols, and stating that all legal firearms must be kept unloaded and the trigger locked, a group people said that it took away their Second Amendment right. The people that disagreed with them were private gun owners. The federal trial court said that the Second Amendment only applied to militias and not private gun owners. I think that everyone should be allowed to have firearms because they are good for…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution was created as a part of the Bill of Rights in 1791. This Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but different interpretations of this amendment have encouraged a long-running debate over the rights of individual citizens to buy, own and carry firearms and gun control legislation. Prior to the framing of this amendment the word “militia” referred to assemblies of able bodied men who organized in order to watch over their communities, colonies and eventually states, once the United States gained its independence from Great Britain in 1776. At the time, many believed that the government only used soldiers in order to oppress the people. In turn many people believed…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heart of America The second amendment to our constitution states that Americans have the right to bear arms. Which means own firearms. The original intent was to have the weapons for defense. (Martinell, 2014)…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To continue, the second amendment means the people of America have the right to have a gun for the safekeeping of our country. This affects gun control policies by saying anyone can have a gun. If the government wanted to ban guns, they are taking away the country’s freedom. Also, they would be taking guns away from the Militia, so if the army was in a different country and people attack America, the Militia would have no way of fighting back.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lately, with the high rise of gun violence and mass shootings in the United States gun control, gun laws, and the Second Amendment have been a prevalent controversial topic amongst many. The Second amendment word for word states: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many different ways, but it serves one specific purpose. If you read the federalist papers, you will understand the thought process of our founding fathers as they wrote the constitution bill of rights.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On one side, rules governing guns use can hinder people’s ability to deter or stop criminal attacks. On the other hand, these same rules have the potential to prevent the harm that guns cause. Every gun law faces this trade-off. Trayvon Martin case wasn’t the end nor was it the beginning of the Second Amendment. Below is a list of cases that’s happened over time pertaining to gun laws.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is very clear and stated soundly, that the right to bear arms by the people shall not be infringed upon. Therefore, this paper establishes that gun ownership is indeed an inherent right. The application of gun control measures by the courts, therefore, should be based not only on the first clause of the text of the Second Amendment, but on both clauses, which are separately interpreted. Therefore the decision by certain courts to determine that civilians vacate the right to own guns independent of the state is unfounded and…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cons Against Gun Control

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A big topic up for debate in the United States is gun control. A question that is often asked is, should there be more restrictions on the process of buying a gun? While some say there is a need to require stricter background checks or psychological testing others would argue that it is our right as Americans to own firearms. Gun control in the United States has become too restricting to serve its original purpose. The second amendment of our country’s Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays