Argumentative Essay On Genetic Future

Improved Essays
Albert Zarate
Mr. Dwyer
English 11
04 January 2017
Genetic Future
Geneticists have been growing and reaching important new discoveries in our life, many people value the potential of genetics, and they know that this could help fix any health, genetic and physical problems that appear everyday. The genetic material is delicate, so that if the transfer is not completed it could cause greater and unforeseen consequences, that is the why many people think that the risk of birth defects increase affecting futures generations. The management and creation of genetic material should be allowed, and supported by many organizations and people in general because if it is realized correctly, it could save lives and find the cure for mortal diseases.
…show more content…
The future is relationated with changes on humans to finally create a complete individual without defects or deficiencies that affect the normal life of a regular person. Most of the times that an individual born with a disability is meant to suffer bullying or any other type of discrimination, this is the principal idea to create a strong equipment and help to avoid this problems and give to everybody a great life without limits.
All the humans have the opportunity to live once, and each one know how want spent their time and enjoy each experience. If a person is available of create their dreams reality, why not everybody do the same thing and fight for their goals to get a great and a happy future for themselves. Some countries, allow the use of human germ line therapy, while others like the government of our country United States do not allow funds to be used for human germ line therapy research, and less going to donate insures for this jobs, but they need to considered this change as the form to change the
…show more content…
"Human Genetic Enhancement Will Benefit Humanity." Humanity's Future, edited by Louise I.
Gerdes, Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010447208/OVIC?u=nvk12&xid=7a227228. Accessed 13 Dec. 2016. Originally published as "To Enhance or Not to Enhance," Reason, 8 May 2002.
Green, Ronald M. "Human Genetic Engineering Should Be Allowed." Genetic Engineering, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing
Viewpoints in Context,link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010138292/OVIC? u=nvk12&xid=bd0668ab. Accessed 14 Dec. 2016. Originally published as "Building Baby from the Genes Up," Washington Post, 13 Apr. 2008.
"Human Genetics." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2015. Opposing Viewpoints in
Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/PC3010999113/OVIC?u=nvk12&xid=2f1ba953.
Accessed 13 Dec. 2016.
"Study: Genetic quirk may have helped humans survive killer smoke." Philadelphia
Inquirer[Philadelphia, PA], 8 Aug. 2016. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A460190476/OVIC?u=nvk12&xid=6cd83114. Accessed 14 Dec.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this enthralling, enlightening book, Ronald M. Green’s Babes by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Design explores the potential promise and threat in the innovation of genetic engineering. Babies by Design offers several elements of the complicated subject: it presents an eloquent description of the sophisticated technology and science, it clearly recaps the reasonable arguments for and against numerous exercises of biotechnology, and it relates the ideas of science fiction to that of the uncertain future. Green graduated Summa Cum Laude at Brown University, before receiving his Ph.D. in religious ethics from Harvard University in 1973. Green has written nine books and more than 170 articles on theoretical and applied ethics. This gives him…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He used more “friendly” examples to show the benefits of genomic science. His essay appeal to our sense of apathy and sympathy. He mentioned the different examples of risk but immediately counter the risk with his own perspectives. “Granted, the social effects of reproductive genetics are worrisome. The risks of producing a "genobility," genetic overlords ruling a vast genetic underclass, are real.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cook-Deegan and Maienschein abstain from arguing for or against genetic engineering rather the argument lies in the fact that the public should decide actively instead of passively. Cook-Deegan and Maeinschein’s introduction does a good job of putting into context how far genetic engineering has progressed, but the shift from the recent advancements of genetic engineering to history of the genetic engineering is abrupt. The beginning of the paper leads a different way than where the paper's purpose is. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein main function of this paper is to make apparent to the public that they are currently deciding passively which is never a good way to decide. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein are discussing much more than just genetic engineering.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eugenics: Argument FOR by May Slaughter Human genome editing enhances humans with desirable traits, either known as positive or negative eugenics, possible. Eugenics was coined by Sir Francis Galton, cousin of Darwin, in 1883. 19th century Britain looked down upon anyone, of the lower class. They had planned on sterilizing all of the following: mental illness, alcoholism, criminality, chronic poverty, blindness, deafness, feeble-mindedness, and prostitutes. Along with Galton, Hitler has also given people a bad opinion of eugenics.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honors Ethics of Genome Editing Faculty: Jennifer L. Cruise (Biology) and Michael J. Degnan (Philosophy) Where do you draw the line between the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ of genome editing? Which traits are we allowed to change, and who decides this? Will we be allowed to use gene editing to change basic human traits such as intelligence and athletic ability?…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, I found the subject of genetic engineering incredibly intriguing as it pushes the boundaries of genetics towards valuable disease research and discoveries of new medications and cellular behaviors. At the same time, there could be great consequences and opportunity to raise legal and ethical…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Genetic Enhancement

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings,” Julian Savulescu states that we are morally obligated to use genetic enhancement, specifically regarding our children. He argues this by proposing the idea that genetic enhancement is no different than environmental enhancements or treating disease in that they all breed the same result: improved wellbeing of those affected. Savulescu also discusses an objection to genetic enhancement on the grounds that it will lead to a split in society between those who are enhanced and those who are not, and those who are not will face discrimination. Although this is a valid objection, I am opposed to genetic enhancement because ultimately I believe that one cannot definitively prove…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human evolution took millions of years to develop our current species and to develop the technological sophistication we now have today. The possibilities of human advancement seem limitless and the only opposition we have is ourselves. Why should humanity limit itself over genetically modified organisms? Why do people think humans have gone to far on genetic engineering? Genetic modification is the process of altering the DNA in an organism’s genome.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene editing is the alteration of genes in germ cells which become either sperm or eggs and are inheritable to future generations. Genetic editing has been used in agriculture to enhance crops, it is now being explored in humans too. This technology could potentially eradicate genetic diseases and prevent future generations from passing it on. Gene editing is done through the CRISPR-Cas9 system, where the embryo is edited to the desired outcome. It identifies and attacks the viral DNA and then it changes the targeted DNA strand that can be replaced or turned off.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scientists are experimenting a lot of new methods that improves human health and upgrading technological advances. The findings from their experiments and research are revolutionizing the way how people are born and live . It is getting to the point where couples can modify an embryo to not have some sort of cancer and birth defects for an expensive cost. However, it doesn’t stop there because later on these couples will be able to modify and customize the embryo completely and make the perfect child that they wanted and wished for. This process that the couple can do is called genetic modification.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A genetically altered baby is something some people have only dreamed about, but now, it has become a reality. Scientist have discovered a way to alter human genetic traits and produce the perfect offspring. Some traits scientists have tried to alter include sex, eye color, and height, but it is still in the experimenting stage and should be possible within the next few years. Add more. Creating genetically altered babies should be prohibited.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Future for Human Genetics People have been around long enough to know that everything changes (for the better or worse). Within the past few years, there has been a lot of debate over the scientific breakthrough of being able to modify the human genome. Many doctors and scientists have welcomed the idea with open minds while others are hesitant to become involved. Some see the dangers involved with the process while others see the endless possibilities coming out of this revolutionary discovery.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics