Argumentative Essay: The Dangers Of Genetic Animals

Improved Essays
Do you think something as fictional as glow-in-the-dark animals or spider-goats is possible? Well, thanks to today science, animals can have extraordinary traits they wouldn’t normally show. Scientist have manipulated around with an organism’s genes for a while, this is known as genetic engineering (GE), and they can now transfer genes from one animal species to another. With GE animals, scientist can advance human health, food production, and other needs of people. These GE animals bring up a lot of concern among people about the well-being of the animals, so the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates GE animals. The FDA have approved of some GE animals, but others are harder to pass. While GE animals will help benefit the human …show more content…
One bizarre modification was in beef in battle, in which the beef was genetically engineered to not feel pain, a rare condition found in humans. This was to help since beef cattle were forced to feel pain before and during their slaughter. It’s still unclear whether the FDA will approve of this animal. There is, however, an animal approved by the FDA, and that is the world's first fast-growing salmon. This salmon was modified, by a company known as AquaBounty, to grow twice its normal size in 16 to 18 months rather than the standard 3 years. The GE salmon was inserted with genes from a Chinook salmon and an eel to help it grow quicker. Even after the FDA approved of the salmon, many people refused to buy it and more than 60 stores, such as Trader Joe's and Whole Foods, refused to sell it. Yet another weird animal scientist has genetically made were spider-goats. Spider-goats are made to help with the production of silk. The GE goats produce spider silk in their milk, which it was created by injecting proteins found in spider silk in goat embryos. These goats produce around a half ounce of silk each day, which would take around 100 spiders to …show more content…
It is mostly being as debatable as GE animals in food production because they won’t end up on our plates. Scientist have genetically modified cat and dogs to be hypoallergenic, meaning they won’t cause an allergic reaction to people. The main problem is that this a torturous experience for the animal to go through, and a better option is just to take allergy pills. Vietnamese scientist has found a way to turn seahorses golden. They have combined golden dust with jellyfish proteins and then inserted into seahorse’s eggs. Another weird gene modification scientist has made were glow-in-the-dark animals. The first glow-in-the-dark animal was a mouse, in which a mouse embryo was injected with a jellyfish protein. Sheep, dogs, rabbits, and other animals were genetically modified to glow-in-the-dark in similar way. Some GE animals were used in medicine for their blood. Cows used for medicine are genetically modified not for their milk or meat, but for their plasma. The cows are injected with a virus, so that they create a strong immune system. Then the GE cow’s plasma is extracted from their blood to create antibodies, proteins that fight microorganisms that causes diseases, and these antibodies could be used one day to treat Ebola, influenza, Zika, and other diseases. Rabbits were also approved by the FDA to be genetically modify to treat hereditary angioedema, a genetic disease that causes body swelling and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Along with their opinion that animal testing is unnecessary, animal rights activists are concerned that research animals receive poor treatment and care. However, “scientists, veterinarians, physicians, surgeons, and others who do research in animal laboratories are as much concerned about the care of the animals as anyone can be” (Animal Research 8). Animal rights groups make assumptions about the treatment of animals in research labs without accurate research to back up their statements. The groups say the animals are not adequately cared for, yet in reality the researchers are always making sure the animals are treated humanely and live comfortably. Additionally, “animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Testing Cures

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A vaccine now sold, prevents these diseases (Benefits of Animal Research). Along with animal testing for cosmetics, treatments, Drugs, vaccines, etc… Many surgical procedures have and continue to develop through the use of animals in experiments. Organ transplantation, open heart surgery, and many other procedures have developed by using animals as test subjects (Science, Medicine, and Animals 2004). Edward Jenner has had his great share in the advancement of the medical field, in 1796 Jenner founded the principles of vaccination for small pox after he realized that cows had often suffered and recovered from cowpox, a smallpox like disease which affected cows. To-date, the only disease to completely experience full elimination was smallpox; the very last case for smallpox was in Somalia on October, 1977 (Smallpox eradicated through…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that Animal experimentation has played a huge role in enabling people to discover, prevent and cure diseases. Many diseases were found and there were numerous advantageous results from the experiments. However, there is a problem with this reasoning because the drugs or medicine that are invented by animal experimentation can respond differently in humans. According to the statistics, 92 percent of all drugs that were guaranteed safe to be used for humans and that were effective in animals, failed in human bodies because they were dangerous and did not really work. ( Food and Drug Administration) Penicillin is a antibiotic agent which is commonly used in the treatment of bacterial infection.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although it may be considered necessary, does not always mean it is the most meticulous. Testing on animals is said to be a better alternative to testing on humans because it is considered to be more ethical, but is testing on animals an ethical thing to do? Animals are also said to be a better alternative due to the fact that they have a shorter lifespan than humans do. Animal testing research is immensely regulated and there are many laws the researchers have to supersede in order to not mistreat the animals being tested, however that does not ensure the life of the animal will not be obscured in the process. Animal testing is necessary for the reason that when polio began to strike in North Carolina, the medical center of the University of Michigan came out with the first polio vaccine, as well as many others to follow (“History of Animal Research” 1).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then would animal rights activists still say there 's no point in animal experimentation? Through these experiments scientists have developed many cures and vaccines for many different diseases. In many cases animals have benefited from these experiments because it 's helped us create vaccines for diseases like rabies or distemper. Probably every shot you have given to your dog or cat have come from some type of experimentation. Testing on animals is highly regulated to protect animals from mistreatment and it is in the best interest of the researcher to treat the animals humanely for better test results.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henrietta Lacks death causes researchers to steal her cells for studying and developing treatments for “herpes, leukemia, influenza, hemophilia and Parkinson’s disease, and they’ve been used to study lactose digestion, sexually transmitted diseases, appendicitis, human longevity, mosquito mating, and the negative effects of working in sewers” (“Animals in Science”). Mrs. Lacks’s cells are HeLa cells that give researchers a way to test and experiment on different diseases. Her cells helps create new medication and treatments to combat many diseases out in the world today. Vitro testing impacts our lives today making animal research not the only…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chimps share ninety-nine percent of DNA with humans while mice share ninety-eight percent. A majority of animals are derived from the same ancestors, which leads to the similarities being present and making some animals adequate test subjects. Animal testing is inhumane, but the point of animals lacking rights is true. Human lives should be put above animals when there is a known chance of the subjects dying; the humans should not be exposed to the dangers and mutations that take place in the labs. Though the animals should not have to face the problems either, human lives are more important because of the fact that a human has more significant thought processes and is capable of making moral decisions.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans” (Louwe). As research shows testing on animals helps humans it also can help benefit themselves. If animal testing was never a thing a lot of animals would have died from “rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus” (Louwe). Certain products need to be tested on animals to make sure that they are safe to use. “American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance” (Louwe).…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As discussed previously, animal testing for medical use is ethical because it furthers human knowledge and safety, whereas using animals for cosmetics is unethical because it doesn’t further our knowledge just tests what we already know. Numerous cosmetic companies test on animals because they want to add untested ingredients that aren’t necessary to add into their products ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing"). These ingredients aren 't necessary to use because there are already pre-tested and safe ingredients that can be used instead, so there doesn’t have to be testing on animals. Cruelty-free companies use the already many safe ingredients available in their products, so they do not test on animals ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing”). If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advanced computer systems, mathematical models (yourgenome.org, 2015) as well as tests using human tissues and cells can be used to test new treatments and drugs (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016). These methods, as well as the use of human volunteers, will allow tests to be more cost-effective, environmentally friendly and efficient (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016) (New England Anti-Vivisection Society, 2016). Animal tests are also generally inapplicable to humans (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 2016) due to variation in anatomy and biochemistry between species (New England Anti-Vivisection Society, 2016). Another argument against animal testing is that the experiments performed on the animals are generally cruel and the animals are often killed after the experiment (yourgenome.org, 2015). This poses the question whether or not is in unethical to use animals as test subjects; even if the experiments lead to important scientific…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays