The Pros And Cons Of Free Trade

Superior Essays
The concept of free trade is like the concept of a free market, except that it is international. Free trade allows international actors within the international trade sphere to do as they please without tariffs or restrictions from the nations involved. It was intended to increase economic prosperities. Countries around the world had supported free trade for their own individual reasons. The United States had been involved with free trade since NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) passed and eventually the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership). Since then, there have been questions on whether or not free trade was a good idea and if it still is a good idea. In the case for free trade, free trade has been argued to have contributed greatly to the US’s economic …show more content…
Corporations outsource jobs because it is cheaper, but the cost of cheaper labor comes from the low-wage workers in developing countries. Developing countries are put into a troublesome position where they have to juggle with the economic benefits of free trade and the abuse of their people. Joel Paul, a professor from the University of California, stated that under free trade, “[d]eveloping countries must compete for capital investment and jobs, and this competition leads countries to lower their labor standards in a self-destructive “race to the bottom” (Paul 200). The countries that benefits off of free trade the most are the countries where the corporations belong to and the countries that the corporations decide they want to do business with. Developing countries end up competing with each other to provide cheaper labor in order to attract and keep foreign investments. This dependency on the investment of corporations jeopardizes the sovereignty of these nations. Nations cannot make their own decisions to protect the health and safety of their own people because they are under the pressure to keep these corporations

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, what is the opportunity cost that comes with Nike choosing the work labor in another country versus work labor in America. First the laws and wages of society range widely different in various countries, other countries like China, Philippines, and Indonesia are willing to do the work for a cheaper cost because of the cost of living in another country or simply because they require the money at any cost due to their poor economy. Secondly big companies like Nike avoid paying higher prices in the product, so they can buy the material to make the merchandise for cheaper in another country and charge you what you think are good low prices but for them is a good profit. The other side the opportunity cost is that Nike will state it creates jobs for thousands of people in poor economies, it creates a relationship with struggling economies and brings business flow to that country or that it even gives the country recognition due to the big label name it carries throughout the world. The choice is obvious for Nike but are they doing this trade ethical once again?…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanizing Trade Analysis

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The East Asian Tigers are a great example of how export-led growth can use interventionist policies to induce intertemporal poverty reduction. The (EAT) chose winning industries and subsidized them from competition until they could compete. The first generations of workers in EPZs suffered greatly but their children are much better off. Autarky, however, has proven disastrous in many countries because it preserves inefficient industries while ensuring intergenerational cycles of poverty. Jones believes trade restrictions impose short-term constraints by raising costs for consumers but these costs are outweighed by long-term benefits.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Trade Pros And Cons

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Having free trade agreements, governments do not need to pay subsidies, so they can save more money. With savings, countries can invest into various things, one being a foreign investment that can add more capital into that country. Since in free trade there is no “protection” countries are now able to become a global competition in the market (Amadeo). Free trade does not require countries to have already been trading partners in order for it to work, which opens up even more possibilities to create a vast amount of new trading partners (“Free…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The technology progress have given the people the opportunity to do business internationally. Open trade allows the countries to find the cheapest things all over the world and offer the best options for the consumers. These leads to the competition among producers, and makes products much cheaper. However, there are ones who argue that globalization can lead the wealthy companies to take advantage of poorer ones, as in this case, they can exploit the cheap labor. The supporters of anti-globalization movement mention, that globalization can abolish the diversity and lead to homogenized world, where Western traditions overwhelm.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and Coopers main emphasize is that we need to “advance trade by any means”, multilaterally, regionally, bilaterally, and unilaterally. In order to achieve this, they want to establish the Global Free Trade Association (GFTA), to work with the outdated WTO to increase free trade unilaterally. Members of the GFTA would be those who are already involved in free trade, open investment, minimal regulations, and strong property rights. The GFTA would make it easier for unqualified countries to join, because unlike with the WTO, countries wouldn’t have to got through negations. They state that “GFTA would be trade enhancing and would lock in the unilateral opening”.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Wto

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The WTO is censured for allegedly being written by and for corporations, benefiting only them in negotiations. Additionally, 86% of the worlds resources is going to rich countries, benefiting mostly those who can afford to produce and import. People also do not approve of the fact that the WTO has universal laws, which undermine local level decision making that may be able to make more beneficial laws and policies for each unique territory. The TPP and free trade is deplored because of the effects of NAFTA. It is believed that NAFTA resulted in fewer good jobs, causing family farms and smaller businesses to struggle.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From the business point of view it is important to understand that outsourcing is part of globalization, and it benefits the company’s efficiency and it saves money in labor. Many Americans believe that outsourcings hurt Americans economy and are against the idea of taking Americans jobs to other countries. Bryson, a global economist for Wells Fargo said: “When jobs move from a factory in the South to one in Guatemala or China, it certainly has a negative impact on that community in the short run…But in the long run it makes things more efficient." (Hargreaves, 2012) And in fact it might make things more efficient for the company because it is relatively easier to establish a business in China than in the United States, however it is inedible to ignore the impact in American workers. “Over the past decade data from the United States Department of Commerce show that U.S biggest companies that employ a fifth of American workers reduced their work forces by approximately 3 million jobs while increasing employment overseas.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, free trade agreements, or FTAs, are facing a similar predicament. While free trade allows for products to be exported cheaply to foreign markets, it also displaces jobs and has lead to trade deficits. Today, free trade is being analyzed to determine whether if it positively or negatively impacts the overall economy, and whether FTAs need to be revised or repealed. Those who support free trade argue that more products will be imported without tariffs or restrictions, so in the end they will cost the consumer less. Those who wish to eliminate free trade agreements argue that they cause increased unemployment due to competition and cheap foreign labor.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the biggest problems with globalization is that countries are taking advantages of poor countries by building plants in their countries so that they can pay the workers less which makes those companies make more money but doesn’t really help that country (Collins, 2015). The reason that is not a good thing is because the country is not being able to have of its own local productions to be able to make money for its country and to help improve it and advance it (W, 2014). Since other countries business are coming in to build their plants in areas that aren’t industrialized yet has made it so the countries they are in cannot be a part of the direct investment. The reason they cannot be a part of it because they are just being used for the cheap labor which every company looks for. This takes the jobs from developed countries because those countries have a higher wage that the workers have to be paid so companies are leaving to poor countries for lower wages (Wild & Wild, 2014).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ron Unz, a successful publisher, presented that opening the labor market would cause a surplus of labor, it would only benefit the wealthiest in society, it would cause suffering to other social classes competing for jobs and higher wages, and would cause “severe political backlash” from the people of the U.S. Kathleen Newland, co-founder of the Migration Policy Institute, argued that an open labor market would not work because it would cause low productivity and lower wages, and that the social costs would be too great, such as establishing infrastructure for new…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays