Argumentative Essay On Felons In Congress

Improved Essays
Felons in Congress As we know, many people in congress have been convicted for at least one felony. Why is it that these felonies do not stop them from being able to serve in congress? (Caune) Although people make mistakes and they can become a better person, I believe that politicians who have formally been convicted of certain crimes should not be able to serve our country, because of their reputation and issues concerning trust. Many politicians have been charged with a felony of some sort, but nothing in the Constitution disqualifies a felon from serving time in prison. Why is this so? You can’t vote if you’re a felon, but you can run for office? Although you can still run, that does not mean you can avoid serving time in prison. I don’t believe that everyone convicted should be exempt. It should depend on what you did and why you did so. If you stole money for nothing but your own greedy reasons, then you should not be able to run, but if you killed …show more content…
In the state of Alabama, no person convicted of embezzlement of the public money, bribery, perjury, or other infamous crime, shall be eligible to the legislature, or capable of holding any office of trust or profit. Also, in the state of Mississippi no person shall be eligible to a seat in either house of the Legislature, or to any office of profit or trust, who shall have been convicted of bribery, perjury, or other infamous crime; and any person who has been convicted of giving or offering, directly , or indirectly, any bribe to procure his election or appointment, and any person who gives or offers ant bribe to procure the election or appointment of any person to office, shall, on conviction thereof, be disqualified from holding any office of profit or trust under the laws of this state. These states aren’t going to let you serve if you have committed any of these

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Juvenile Justice

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The first opinion seems to be correct, but only when it comes to the cases of delinquency. However, in the cases of heinous crimes there is no excuse for the juveniles, and juveniles must be undoubtedly tried as adults. In general, it is quite obvious that juvenile offenders should be treated as adults. It will help to maintain social order and teach children about inadmissibility of any crime.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The New Jim Crow Summary

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Alexander, “Nearly every state allows private employers to discriminate on the basis of past criminal convictions. In fact, employers in most states can deny jobs to people who were arrested but never convicted of any crime.”. She explains that ex-convicts find it…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vermont, Maine, and Mississippi (depending on the crime) are the only three states out of fifty that allow voting while in jail, for all other states the voting right is removed while serving time in jail, prison, on parole or probation. For all 50 states, the right to vote is restored after serving the correct time or term. Some conditions apply for certain states, but it is still possible to retain the right to vote. The major of the states have the law, which is you lose the right to vote while serving your term and retain it afterwards, but other states have different laws. I believe that the right to vote should be revoked while serving your time, but retained after you’ve served your term.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Felons To Vote

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Felons to Vote I. Introduction A. Hook- Quote B. Thesis: Felons should have ability to vote because they have served their time, they did not lose their rights, and they are still involved in society and the racism card tends to be pulled. II. Common Ground A. “Eight states -- Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, Virginia and Wyoming -- permanently bar ex-felons from voting without exception. Maryland and Arizona permanently disenfranchise those convicted of a second felony, and Tennessee and Washington state permanently bar from voting felons convicted before 1986 and 1984…”…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Felons have violated the established “Social Contract Theory” demonstrating that a felon’s judgment is faulty, as well as the susceptibility of felons to recidivism. In addition, felon disenfranchisement laws are not a predominant factor in the social reintegration of a felon. Moreover, according to the 14th amendment: states have the authority to deny one's right to vote due to criminal behavior. Lastly, felon disenfranchisement laws are not inherently racist nor encompass any racially targeted laws. If a person rebels feloniously against any aspect of society, warranted by moral, social, and legal means, that person’s right to vote must be revoked.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nyquanesha Stacey Professor Howard ENC1102 (168898) 26 October 2016 Convicted Felons: Should They Have the Right to Vote? Felons, convicts, criminals that’s what they are called, they are the deviants of the world but even so they are still human beings, should they have the right to elect a “new chief of the free world”? or vote on new laws? Some people believe absolutely not they should not have the right to vote.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting Rights In Kentucky

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weeks before he leaves office, the governor of Kentucky on Tuesday issued an executive order that will immediately grant the right to vote to about 140,000 nonviolent felons who have completed their sentences. The order by Gov. Steven L. Beshear, a Democrat, was cheered by advocates for criminal justice reform and civil rights, who said it would place Kentucky’s policy more in line with others across the nation and was consistent with a trend toward easing voting restrictions on former inmates. Kentucky had been one of just three states imposing a lifetime voting ban on felons unless they received a special exemption from the governor. Florida and Iowa still carry the lifetime ban. “Once an individual has served his or her time and paid…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, these limitations implemented on felons can be traced back to the democratic foundation of America as women, poor, African Americans and felons were stripped of voting rights (McLaughlin, huffingtonpost.com) which still continues for felons today due to the strict enforcement of laws. Many Americans consider this to be a negative impact within the democracy as the exclusion of felons from political involvement brings about racial discrimination within the society (Sidlow and Henschen 171). Limitations on voting has led to the presence of racial discrimination as African Americans who are felons are on the top of the hierarchy in comparison to the rest of the population (Sidlow and Henschen 171). Due to which there is an imbalance within the voting system as a significant amount of individuals are being underrepresented within the democratic process. Furthermore, due to felon disfranchisement and the idea of racial discrimination, questions are being raised regarding who goes to the prison in United States based on its high incarceration rates nationwide (Greenhouse, nytimes.com).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In addition, felons are not allowed to vote in many states ("What Are the Requirements to Be Eligible to Vote in Federal Elections?"). This is completely unfair towards them. Certain felons should still maintain the right to vote. Criminals who are, say, terrorists, should not be allowed to vote. However, if the charge against someone is not serious, they should not have their rights stolen away from…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Felons

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Individuals convicted of a felony are not eligible to vote while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation. Voting rights are restored a couple years after the completion of all supervised release. Felons who have served their sentence and have followed protocol should have the right to vote in less than two years. Voting is vital aspect of our lives. Being confined for so many years, deprived of freedom and a few rights taken away, an individual would love to vote in a major election like this year.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ana Sofia Garza Mrs. Williams English II Pre-Ap 02 November 2016 Justice Many people have committed crimes. Some because that is what they do best and some because they don 't know any better and even some who commit crimes out of love, believing the crime is for a greater good. The United States criminal justice system should not allow for exceptions in the application of law due to the fact that justice should be applied equally to all. Even though a person might be disabled, a violation of the law or murder still remains as an illegal action.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    SUGGESTED TITLE: 7-Eleven Offering Second Chances for Felons Everybody in this world makes mistakes. For some people, it ended up to a point where they got for themselves a criminal offense. What is even worse, they may have difficulty applying for a job again.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is It Fair To Vote

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think it’s fair that some people like felonies cannot vote in the state of Texas until they have been out of prison and off parole for seven years. To me this gives them time to get their life together and start to adjust to how the world is at that time vs to when they were locked up. When someone goes to prison for a long period of time, then the world if totally different when they get out. They need time to catch up with the new technology and etc. when they are released from prison.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last 40 years, incarceration in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. We have the highest incarceration rate in the world; we hold 5% of the world’s population, but house 25% of the world’s prisoners (Kelly 2015). The use of incarceration has gradually become a more acceptable and more used form of punishment. As a result, our prison population is overflowing with offenders ranging from petty theft criminals to violent offenders. As cited in the textbook, purposes of our justice system should be retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, (Clear, Reisig, & Cole 2016, p.72-73) but we focus far too much on punishment first and rehabilitation second, if ever.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Criminal justice is an important aspect in our society, which it functions to organize the public and enforce justice. Many criminal professionals have studied to identify the best possible criminal justice approach to handle criminal problems we face. As a result, professionals have developed the restorative justice as a new alternative for the retributive justice where it primary focuses on executing the punishments. Restorative justice has gained popularity over the past decades in our society that many criminal related institutions have developed programs that are based on the restorative justice framework. CoSA, or also known as Circles of Support and Accountability is an good example of the community program that is based on the concept of the restorative justice to resolve the problem arises by the crime committed and promote the peaceful criminal justice.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays