Argumentative Essay On Edward Snowden

Improved Essays
“It is better, so the fourth amendment teaches us, that the guilty sometimes go free than the citizens be subject to easy arrest”(William Douglas). The Bill of Rights was devised to restrict the government’s power and to guarantee personal freedoms. Edward Snowden released documents that exposed government programs that were designed to personal information in order to ensure national security. Those programs, predominantly ran by the NSA, have undoubtedly stimulated unreasonable searches, therefore transgressing the fourth amendment. The USA is a republic. By definition, it must be run for the people and by the people. Snowden has unveiled a government that is unconstitutional and corrupt, therefore deeming himself to be a hero.
According to Judge Richard Leon, some of the NSA’s security operations are considered illegal. The Judge had considered a data facility in Utah. It is a government owned and operated warehouse that stores essentially every conversation on an American telephone. Keith Alexander, a government
…show more content…
The NSA is not stealing America’s privacy in exchange for safety; the NSA is simply just stealing America’s privacy. Although the USA is known as the land of the free, there is not any freedom in the scrutiny of a citizen’s private conversation. Our government has neglected the constitution, taking every citizens’ right to their own privacy. Snowden has uncovered some of the NSA’s unfortunate secrets. The NSA’s illicit actions can’t be justified by the Patriot Act, nor any other law. Federal Judge Richard Leon confirms that the government’s national espionage is unconstitutional. Even with the USAs data records, the NSA has been incapable of preventing terrorism. Snowden has revealed a government that had imposed a false sense of freedom. Snowden has provided the citizens of American with their right to information; In turn, Snowden is a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    City Of Thieves Analysis

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NSA spying on Americans is illegal when the law was passed against protecting American secret interest with the boldness in president voice he said in essence “I have the power to do that because l say l can” those are the words of a hero. Kolya was a double minded person that he faces whatever that approaches him. Chapter 5, page 75 explained how “Lev told himself that now he is convince that there was nothing behind kolya’s blue eyes, neither fear nor excitement about the prospect of a fight, which means kolya was gifted with anger that made him fearless and also made him calm”. Despite kolya did not made it to the end to gain his freedom he was a hero who was not afraid of war, who knows how to play the devils mind and gets whatever he…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nsc-68

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many Americans feel as though the Patriot Act interferes with our 1st and 4th amendments; which are the right to free speech and expression, as well as protecting the citizens of unwarranted search and seizures. The authority given to the government to violate individual privacy crosses the boundaries set in the Constitution. The U.S. Constitution (specifically the Bill of Rights) guarantees every American certain Individual rights. Several critics have claimed that the United States of America no longer protects these rights. From the government’s warrantless wiretapping, obtaining personal info from NSL’s or National Security Letters, emails, and phone records or unconstitutional surveillance of the citizens of the USA, free thinking, speech, and typical American lifestyle cannot…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Constitutional Amnesia of the NSA Snooping Scandal” has formed a valid question in my mind. How can President Barack Obama “assure us that we need not be worried about the National Security Agency listening to our phone calls or monitoring out Internet use,” when we are assured by the Fourth Amendment’s “ban on general warrants on indiscriminate searches without probable cause”? How can America’s president possibly think that the NSA’s programs are “healthy for our democracy” when we have an act in place that has informed us that we are not to be searched. My concern does not lie within answering whether or not Edward Snowden is America’s hero, but why Americans have listened to the calming and assuring voice of Obama telling us that searching is okay when we have laws against them doing…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Friedman and Kerr). However, the USA PATRIOT Act amends several parts of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III) in such a manner that violates the civil liberties granted by the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1657). FISA, specifically Section 702, permits United States intelligence officials to examine the “communications of foreigners outside the U.S. without a warrant” (Schallhorn), while Title III “established that governmental interception of an individual’s telephone conversation, conducted without the target’s consent, constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1658). Specifically, Section 218 of the USA PATRIOT Act alters FISA § 1804(a)(7)(B) such that a federal officer is no longer required to show that the sole purpose of surveillance is to achieve information of foreign intelligence, but…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many citizens of the United States who do not agree or like the NSA’s involvement in communication networks. For example, “This country was founded on the notion of liberty. So it is striking to us that we have reached a point in our history when the expectation of privacy and liberty is dissolving” (Paul and Yoho). A major argument against the NSA is that it violates the rights of the countries people. Paul and Yoho say “We need to go back to the basics and use the Fourth Amendment as our guide.”…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nelson And Rubio Essay

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dear Senators Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio, It has been brought to my attention that the Government has access to surveillance systems that can monitor our phone calls, text messages, emails and etc if needed. I agree that the government should have this right, but I believe there must be some strict guidelines placed in order to ensure the personal privacy of citizens. While discussing this topic, it may seem scary to think as a citizen, that everything in our personal lives isn’t as private as we imagined it to be. But, the questions we all seem to ask ourselves about this issue is, “Why is all of our information so important to the government anyways?” or, “I haven’t done anything wrong, so why would they need to look at my texts or listen to my phone calls?”, and last but not least, “How is this legal?…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4th Amendment Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With this, the government can go through any source of information and violate people’s privacy. For these reasons, the Patriot Act violated the Fourth and First Amendments by the government not showing a warrant of why they are searching the private properties and not notifying others about the information of those search warrants, where no secrecy is even necessary. This act was one of the most serious issues for the country because it violated people’s privacy and breached the First and Fourth…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the United Nations, privacy is basic human right that should be protected by law. The United States Constitution also implies a right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment. Recent laws passed by the government have raised questions about whether the government’s actions infringe upon a citizen’s right to privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first of many laws that increased the powers of government organizations such as the NSA and the FBI. The law allowed these agencies to access private records of US citizens without the need of a warrant or judge’s consent.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After 9/11, The United States was very intent on fighting and stopping terrorism and terrorist attacks. In order to help fight terrorism a bill called The Patriot Act was passed to help fight terrorism. Since then problems have arrived with the passing of this bill, problems that lead to questioning the legitimacy of The Patriot Act. If The Patriot Act was justified, then Edward Snowden would not have had to do what he did. The United States needs supervision while enforcing The Patriot Act to make sure the right of every citizen is protected and that they do not overstep their boundaries.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fourth amendment states that the right of the people to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const., amend. IV). The NSA spying on U.S citizens is similar to an unreasonable search through a person’s private documents. Whether or not the U.S government feels they are justified for their actions, they are not. The attempts of the head members of NSA to paint Edward Snowden as a criminal, are hypocritical, and are a transparent ploy to shift the negativity away from…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The sole purpose of the NSA program was to safeguard our national security in a more expansive, efficient manner. The center on law and security (2007) states “…this requirement to demonstrate all of the substantive and procedural elements of FISA to the Attorney General's satisfaction before any surveillance can begin, would fatally impair the President's ability to carry out his constitutional responsibility to collect foreign intelligence to protect our Nation from attack” (p. 9). Any implementation involving citizen’s privacy is assured to draw controversy, and the root of the problem with this program was a management…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hero or Traitor? The classic definition of a hero, according to Merriam-Webster dictionary, is “a person who is admired for great or brave acts or fine qualities; a person who is greatly admired.” A whistleblower does not usually come to mind with that classic definition. Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower that some consider a hero and others consider a traitor. So how do you classify a whistle-blower as a hero or traitor?…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays