Argumentative Essay On Daniel Keyes Flowers For Algernon

Flowers for Algernon Argumentative Essay In the fictional text “Flowers for Algernon”, written by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon should not have had the brain operation. The surgery failed with consequences of which the doctors were faintly aware. After Charlie recovered, he understood how people thought of him; they treated him differently than ordinary individuals. He was a human experiment and was fully conscious of the failure. Charlie Gordon was satisfied with the results until he noticed signs of regression The social conflicts became a reality for Charlie. Following the experiment Charlie went back to work. Joe and Frank were appalled when they received an unexpected reaction from Charlie after teasing him. Typically they observe Charlie acting foolish, not this time. Charlie was sickened after watching his “best friends” torment him. Later he was aware of what “pull a Charlie Gordon” meant. The expression is used when an employee acts senseless like a mentally challenged individual. Charlie’s associates weren’t pleased with his new behavior; everyone except one signed a petition agreeing to fire Charlie. Nevertheless, Charlie does not have to worry about Joe and Frank teasing him. The doctors often fought about Charlie, considering his disabilities; he never knew …show more content…
The doctors selected Charlie, considering he had no friends and family to address the situation. Moreover, accomplishing the testing was a career goal for the specialists. Before Charlie was operated on, the practitioners warned him the high intelligence was not permanent. Prior to performing the experiment, Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nermur tested the surgery on mice. The rodents’ intelligence tripled; overtime it began to regress leading to the mice death. Even though the mice presented negative results they continued with the operation. Charlie wanted to be used for the experiment; however, he wasn’t fully educated with the side