I am for creation, and always have been since I was little. Not only because it’s what my parents taught me, but …show more content…
Like just about all things argued, there are similarities and differences between the topics of discussion. The answer he gave actually surprised me. It was a yes. A definite one at that, without any hesitation at all. “In science they have actually found a scientific Adam and a scientific Eve that they can trace everyone in the world back to.” Which goes along with the Bible story about Adam and Eve (not Adam and Steve, but that's a different topic). Adam and Eve is the the story of the first humans on earth. He then said “Where the difference comes into play, is where these came from”. In science it says the Big Bang Theory is what created everything. The amazing thing about what God did, was he made man out of dust, and from that man’s rib, he created woman. “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” I was surprised to hear an answer like that, because I had never heard of that coming from science before. I knew that there had to be some similarities because in most arguments, there seems to be at least one thing that matches up, but I had never even heard of there being an Adam and Eve in science. (Genesis 1