There Is To Blame For Capitalism Essay

Good Essays
Currently, the world is profoundly segregated on the issue of economic systems. Divided on the issue, people are supporting capitalism, socialism or a mix of both. In fact, there are no pure capitalist or socialist systems. Pure capitalism, the existence of free market, is the perfect system for the prosperity of individuals, communities and the nation as a whole. People who work so hard do not have the responsibility to pay others bills. That would only uphold further idleness and laziness to those people who fancy hard-working citizens can support everyone else.
However, citizens of a socialist state are not to blame. The lack of knowledge and negligence on the issue are the main reasons why these people are not choosing capitalism over
…show more content…
This is the foremost justification for why capitalism is despised by many and not applied as it should be. The market has to function on its own for it to reflect all the perks of capitalism, as the name evidently indicate— free market. Trying to regulate price, to control and restrict companies, to tax unfairly are all signs of a corrupt capitalist government. Ironically, these actions may appear acceptable and reasonable but they are not. Nonetheless, a government’s task should be anything but these. The law of demand and supply regulate prices, previously established regulations control and restrict companies not tailored decrees to particular corporations for fear of monopoly and abuse; the market will autonomously govern that. If the market determines to make a company profitable or another one fail, then it must inherently be a good thing for everyone. As Hawkins puts it, “Under capitalism, the market reacts almost like a living thing and allocates resources where people want to spend their money.” (Hawkins). On that account, the market needs to be off-limits to the government for true capitalism to exist. A nation where the problem of education and corruption are solved is a nation where true capitalism

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    He stated, “The free market punishes irresponsibility. Government rewards it.” This clearly illustrates that he, like Friedman, is strongly in favour of capitalism, and the ideas that it brings to society. Typically a market economy has strict societal class divisions, and those who work hard for what they earn are normally put into the middle and upper class. Browne is in agreeance with this theory because he believes that those working for their profits should be rewarded for their actions. On the contrary, he thinks that those who fall into the lower class should not be rewarded by the government through means of welfare programs.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First one will need to have an understanding of Marshall’s definition of citizenship. Second one will have to gain an understanding of why Marshall believes that capitalism leads to inequality. Ultimately, there is tension among capitalism and citizenship because capitalism creates individualism that leads to a society where everyone must fend for himself or herself whether one is poor or rich. Also, there is tension because citizenship relies on the notion that all…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My general analysis of the bourgeoisie is about the capitalists’ selfishness and their destruction of social welfare. The bourgeois exempts himself from the disaster of suffering people, so the bourgeois does not have to take responsibility of it. Most of the old national industries have been destroyed and are still being destroyed. Today, this class still protects itself due to the continuation of capitalism; it is unfinished, and will never be finished. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Having little to no governing of the economy it would force companies to compete with one another to make the best product. A lot of people associate the idea of competition in the economy with two things, monopolies and unions. Now obviously monopolies are not beneficial in an economy based on the principles of Capitalism because they would completely eliminate any competition between companies since there would only be one company. So with that being said the government would be needed to prevent companies from merging into one large company. The other thing that people often associate with competition in the economy is the idea of unions.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Leonard Reed was an economist against socialism because he believed “the absence of governmental or any other coercive master-minding—then one will possess an absolutely essential ingredient for freedom: a faith in free people” as said in his piece I, Pencil. The negative aspect of socialism that Reed is addressing is the hindrance of individual’s freedoms. On the other hand, a positive aspect of socialism is the equality it creates for the people in the society. Overall my thoughts on socialism are, that this economic system will not flourish as well as a capitalistic due to the regulations imposed on by the government but it will have greater stability because a majority of the economic power is in the government. As a whole, socialism can be viewed positively or negatively due to its different…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The speaker of the source would also be opposed to socialist values interfering with the economy and private property by taxing the rich to provide for the poor, in addition to providing any sort of social program to help those who can’t help themselves. Unrestrained capitalism, as the source advocates, should not be embraced by society. In fact, the economy should have enough government intervention that while wide-spread success is achieved, independence and innovation are not sacrificed in the process. This idea can be supported through many examples and case studies. Three ideas , however, accurately sum up the benefits of having intervention in the economy: some closure of the gap between societal income classes, innovation is still accomplished, and, most of all, the people who participate in a government regulated system will experience a widespread area of prosperity in not only the economy, but in their everyday lives as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socialism sounds appealing in theory, but does not function well in practice. Capitalism, while not perfect, does have advantages that a socialist economy cannot provide, and creates a fair economy. There are numerous issues that can be resolved through capitalism that cannot be solved though socialism. The most prominent being the lack of incentive found within a socialist economy. If everyone is paid the same amount of money regardless of effort, then there is no true incentive to work.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He does not want people to compete for land, power, money, or anything really. The importance of competition, of a challenge to be better is what drives humankind to do better. The kind of economy Marx describes is controlled by the wealthy, but that does not mean that entry to that class is closed. If people choose to compete, if they choose to innovate, if they choose to work towards a new and better idea, then they may too rise in rank. Marx believes that everything man makes either alienates or brings them closer to…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think Sandel 's own response is perfectly accurate because it is not a question of markets good or bad. It is about some things money can’t buy, and things shouldn’t actually be bought and sold in markets; also, moral boundaries should constrain market forces. First of all, in today 's society, people seek to make more money and grow their wealth, but even the richest people aren 't happy. Therefore, money is not the ultimate solutions, and many things that money can’t buy. Rules of the market simply do not apply to friendships, true love, Nobel prizes, and many other areas of life such as respect, time, or happiness.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Instead of having a separate market and state, Marx argued that the market will not self-regulate and instead need a directing force so monopolies and trusts are avoid. If they are not avoided, monopolies and trusts will drive down competition in the market to the point where an entire commodity or service is controlled by a single firm. Marx consider the free market a state of anarchy within the economy where instead of benefiting households, the firms would attempts to gain complete control as to avoid any competition. Instead, Marx argued that if the state had control in regulating the market system, it would be doing its job of protecting the citizens by preventing monopolization of the economy. In this state of economy, Marx believed that the market would allocate labor and resources instead of the individual like in Smith’s capitalism.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics