Argumentative Essay On Big Foot Real

Big foot is undeniably one of the most argued creatures of world. Is it real? Is it fake? The amount of time you could spend arguing about it is impeccable. Roger Patterson and Bill Gimlin are the reason why Big Foot came to our attention. In 1967, they released a film of the so called “Big Foot” which sparked up a lot of commotion in the media. There just is not enough proof to support his existence. Why has there not been a more recent study about how big he actually is, Big Foot is just a man in a costume, and there is no DNA evidence to prove anything. Roger Patterson and Bill Gimlin seemed to have the evidence they needed to prove Big Foot was real. With the video launched, Bluff Creek soon became a hot spot for Big Foot. The problems with this video is, it is way too shaky and blurry for anyone to actually get a good look at it. Yes, there was an updated version of the film but that still did not get me thinking. Why was every frame all over the place? If you were going to try to capture big foot, Roger should obviously have all the right equipment to capture the perfect shot. One could say that he was excited and with all the adrenaline flowing that he could not keep the camera still. Patterson kept the film safe …show more content…
Munns took it upon himself to enhance the film for further research. After of a month of enhancement, Munns finally got the film to where he wants it. Still, with the enhancement the skeptics still continue to deny his existence. It may not move like a human but, actors are actors for a reason. To act the part of something they are not. If one really wanted too, they could perfect the walk of Big Foot and easily make some poor quality film and say they found Big Foot. There really is no concrete evidence that it is a man in an ape costume, but even scientific experts can claim it does not add