Argumentative Essay: Is Donald Trump Powerful?

Improved Essays
There are very strong and powerful tools that are used to preserve freedom. If you didn’t already know, Donald Trump is the president! Many citizens, as well as non citizens, have different opinions on the matter. However, for those of us who are completely against him and believe he is evil, there is a solution. Items, such as the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, provide tools maintain and secure. These include freedom of speech, right to overthrow the government, and permission to bear arms.

Is Donald Trump evil? I do not believe so. But, of course, many do. We know this due to the right of freedom of speech. “Congress shall make no law respecting...freedom of speech,” as stated in the First Amendment of the Constitution. This lets people express their true opinion to bring about awareness to eventually help the cause.The Declaration of Independence shares that when, “ abuses and usurpations...,” happen, “ it is the their duty, to throw off such government (P3 line 15). Anti-Trump supporters can use this to the extreme. If it is truly believed that Trump is going to destroy this country, then they are more than capable of rounding up troops, grabbing some firearms, and overthrowing the government.
…show more content…
Firearms can range from handguns to semiautomatic rifles to fully automatic rifles. The Second Amendment of the Constitution states that people have,”the right to bear arms”(U.S. Const. Amend. II). This is essentially fundamental for establishing a militia. The government is obviously a very profound power. Materials are improved every day. That being said, the government can easily wipe out any unarmed rebellion. The Second Amendment also signifies that, “a well regulated militia,” is necessary( P7 line 1). This displays the fact that the people are allowed to have well-established militia if one day the government unfortunately results to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Constitution. The entire text of the Second Amendment is “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Some people believe that ever since America has maintained a standing army, militias have become obsolete, and therefore the Second Amendment may now be ignored. However, the framers of the Constitution clearly wanted the citizenry to be armed.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2nd Amendment Arguments

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 2nd amendment is a very popular topic in today’s society and most have posted about the 2nd amendment. In my opinion and interpretation of the amendment it is pretty cut and dry. The founding fathers deemed it necessary to afford law abiding citizens the right to bear arms. As a citizen of this country it is my privilege, yes I said “privilege” not right to bear arms. I should be able to buy any weapon of my choosing whether it be for home defense, the defense of my family or for recreational use.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states that the government cannot take away your firearms because you have the right to own them and the government cannot take that right away from you. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to have firearms for any appropriate purpose. You can use firearms for self-protection, recreation, competition, hunting, or collecting. Most Americans believe that the Second Amendment protects their individual rights. There are many reasons that our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The meaning of this is that all U.S citizens have the right to own a gun and use it in any situation needed, and when it says “Shall not be Infringed” it means to Actively break terms of a Law or Agreement. A gun's purpose in mostly to protect and defend people. I am for the second amendment that is my point of view.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As American citizens, everyone is entitled to certain rights that the government is not supposed to infringe upon. However, the Second Amendment is a right that some political figures are working on taking away. Some Americans believe that this amendment should be repealed from the constitution, while many others know that it is a natural born right of a citizen. Doing research on this topic, it is very clear that not everyone in the government is trying to take away this right, but some political figures are in fact attempting to take away the Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment is stated as “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and a few other men wrote the U.S. constitution which established basic rights and laws for the national government and its citizens. When the constitution was written, a few changes were needed to be made. These changes were called amendments and the first ten amendments were named The Bill of Rights. It was required that majority of the vote between the states, wanted these changes. Finally, on September 25, 1787, the constitution and it’s first ten amendments were ratified.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment of the constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The constitution was created in 1789 and revised in 1992. The purpose of the second amendment is for people to protect themselves, but a great deal of people are abusing the purpose. America has had way too many mass shootings and accidents which resulted in many deaths. If the constitution is a set of laws and laws were established to keep people safe, is it truly doing its job?…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lately, with the high rise of gun violence and mass shootings in the United States gun control, gun laws, and the Second Amendment have been a prevalent controversial topic amongst many. The Second amendment word for word states: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many different ways, but it serves one specific purpose. If you read the federalist papers, you will understand the thought process of our founding fathers as they wrote the constitution bill of rights.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary defines “arms” as “Defensive and offensive outfit for war” and to “bear arms” is defined as “to serve as a soldier, do military service fight.” Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution confers an individual right to possess a firearm for…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Gun Laws

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Guns are used all around the world, but here in the United States, we need to keep our gun usage limited with gun laws. Gun laws are put into action to make sure firearms are used responsibly; however, people will always find a way to break these laws no matter how many are made. Our Second Amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, gives U.S. citizens the right to own a weapon and use it for the right reasons. Gun laws will not reduce the amount of gun deaths in the U.S. because gun laws do not determine crime; gun ownership determines crime numbers. There were 460,000 gun deaths in the U.S. between 1999-2013 and this was the 12th leading cause of death.…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her Op-Ed Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns, Molly Ivins expresses her opinion on gun regulation in the United States. She asserts that the Second Amendment is misunderstood (Ivins 324), and infers that this inhibits the improvement of stricter gun laws. Ivins feels that people who are permitted to possess guns should at least be well trained and have a lot of discipline because guns are very powerful. People who want to own guns, she feels, are obsessed with having the power to kill and she proposes to completely ban guns from the citizens of the United States. While it is true that anyone in the possession of a gun should have competent training and respect for the weapon, representatives of the people and the United States as…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays