Argumentative Essay: How Gun Control Kills

In 1791, as part of the Bill of Rights, the second amendment was adopted, having been ratified by three-fourths of the states. The second amendment is known for a well-regulated militia being necessary to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Since 2015, there are 45 states that allow open carry for firearms. Also, in 15 states require a permit or license to open carry, while eight more have other restrictions on how, when or where guns are allowed. There are two reasons why there should be fewer guns around and restrictions on purchases: to minimize violence and the second amendment refers to an armed citizen militia, not individual gun ownership. Yet despite these reasons, there are people that are for no restrictions on guns and believe that gun control laws are useless. The use of guns should be minimize so we can minimize the violence. In the article, “We Need Gun Control to Stop More Than Criminals” Susan Milligan, is a political and foreign affairs writer, cities “There's the 12-year-old who apparently took a shotgun out of a musical instrument case and shot and injured two classmates at a middle school in New Mexico. His behavior would …show more content…
In the article “How Gun Control Kills” by Jack Hunter, an American radio host, political commentator and Politics Editor for Rare.us, states “The key fallacy of so-called gun-control laws is that such laws do not in fact control guns. They simply disarm law-abiding citizens, while people bent on violence find firearms readily available. If gun-control zealots had any respect for facts, they would have discovered this long ago.” Although not all Americans’ doesn’t believe in gun control, so gun make people want to be violent when they are available to them. Not only that, believing gun control is useless isn’t as important as innocent people being killed by