Argumentative Essay: Democracy For Sale

Improved Essays
Democracy for Sale

Five years ago Citizens United spearheaded a campaign to steal the people's power and unfortunately the Supreme Court decided to rule in favor of the controversial right-wing group, in the devastating ruling of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. This disastrous move by the "Supreme Court scrapped the previous campaign finance laws and essentially declared that companies are allowed to buy politicians by circumventing restrictions via PACs, political action committees" (Tedford), thus stealing the power of the masses and giving our power to those whose bank accounts resemble that of a country's population. Sadly, the affluent 1% of Americans hold more power than the other 99% of this nation because of the current government's pay to win democracy. Without any
…show more content…
This concept would work in a perfect world, but if this was a perfect world communism would work as well. Trickle down economics does not work and will never work, for example, if a CEO's income is doubled it does not mean he will double his worker's salaries, because people are often greedy and want only the best for themselves, and they care not for the single mother working three jobs, CEOs care about padding their wallets not about the wellbeing of the cogs in their money-grubbing machine, and it's so ridiculous that those same "CEO's who pay employees next to nothing, but have a salary that is often over 1000 times that of their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In January 2010, the United States Supreme Court Citizens United ruling struck down the ban on limiting corporate and union contributions and financing of elections. This ruling unleashed a wave of unlimited spending on political ads and other strategic to support candidates and/or damage the image of opposition candidates. The court decision was divided in a 5-4 vote. Essentially, this decision made it permissible for corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums of money on efforts to sway people’s decisions on voting for or against a specific candidate or number of candidates.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2010 Supreme Court Case

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2010, a court case was brought forth to the Supreme Court, Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission. The case dealt with corporations and unions spending on political ads and other political tools, in order to attempt to elect or defeat individual potential politicians (Dunbar). The Supreme Court ultimately came to a 5-4 decision in favor of Citizens United (Dunbar). This ruling basically gave the go-ahead to giant unions and corporations to fund, whichever politician will benefit their specific cause the most. The unlimited ability to spend is corrupting politicians, and creating a congress that works in the best interests of the lobbyist’s that fund certain political movements.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free-market fundamentalists are unfazed by the fact that wealth inequality has soared in recent decades, largely due to liberal economic policies (Jouet). In where the poor and middle class have constantly suffered while the rich continue to accumulate wealth. West states how “illicit marriage of corporate and political elites not only undermines the trust of informed citizens in those who rule over them. It also promotes the pervasive sleepwalking of the populace” this basically correlates to how the government’s sole responsibility to establish democracy has been replaced with the greed and accumulation of wealth. This profit-driven society is eradicating the sense of democracy from American society in where, its elected officials and corporate elites are pensive with economic growth and national affluence (West).…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political corruption is always brought up during election season and seemingly everyone has their own fix. Corruption today can be quickly discovered if one just follows the trail of dark money. Funds given to a politician from a corporation, whether in a campaign or as lobbying, is referred to as dark money by liberal politicians. Citizens United V. FEC was a supreme court case which ruled that money is speech and thus corporations can give endless sums of money to politicians under their constitutional protection of free speech. Liberal politicians often call these funds dark money because the funds are used to promote corporate interest, not the interest of the people.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “One man, one vote”, a phrase and a principle that is the foundation of any great democracy. The U.S has adopted this principle in the form of universal suffrage for all of it citizens and symbolizes the country’s unity and equality. However, every four years in the month of November in the presidential election when one individual is chosen to lead the nation, one would expect for the winner of the election to be the will of the people, but unfortunately that’s not the case. In the most important election in the entire country, a separate institution, the Electoral College, makes the final vote on who will become president. Although intended to be a reflection of the popular vote, the methodology in which it is practice is flawed and leaves…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The primary argument and deciding factor in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2008) was that Citizens United’s First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court is held accountable towards upholding the constitution and upon scrutiny of all relevant rulings, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). The procedure of the Supreme Court’s ruling was a series of addressing previous held court precedents, including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ''Never mistake activity for achievement'', said John Wooden. But in this case, Bernie Sanders will prove that wrong. Sanders was born on September 8, 1941 in Brooklyn, New York to Jewish parents. He attended James Madison High School, Brooklyn College, and University of Chicago where he graduated in 1964 with a Bachelor’s of Arts in political science. During his college years Sanders was also active in the Civil Rights Movement and was part of the Young People’s Socialist League and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My question is drawn from the Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Pages 1-15. The quote that inspired my question was, “In a political debate, the man who is forming a judgement is making a decision about his own vital interests.” This quote made me think about the people I know who have risen above themselves and who seek to help others. People who volunteer frequently, donate large percentages of their paychecks, and people who always hold the door open for others are the people who come to mind. Obviously, these people have their own self-interests as well, but they also spend a noticeable amount of their time helping others and looking out for our society as well.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The foundation in which America stands on was created by brave men who came before us, and made enormous sacrifices through risking their life, and honor to create the greatest nation possible. They designed a constitution to function with certainty, political structure and principles based on the inheritance rights of man. How astonished they will be to see, citizens not voting, money wasted on unnecessary war, government workers making more money than the average citizen. If it is the law which carry the promise of personal liberty.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most of the rich people believe the strategy of trickle down economic. When their corporations earn money, and they can create more job opportunities for the lower class people. However, the goal of trickle down has never existed. The wine stayed on the top cup. As Nicholas Fitz expressed in the article “Economic Inequality: It’s Far Worse Than You Think” People have no idea how worse is the gap between the rich people and the poor people.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hungry for Change Why is it that law mandates public school meals have a minimum calorie intake, but not a maximum? This owes itself to the fact that when nutrition standards were established for public schools, it was to solve the problem of undernourishment. The majority of school aged children used to walk to school, played more outside, and were more active in sports. This resulted in children burning more calories than school meals provided.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is democracy? Democracy to me means freedom. Freedom to pick and choose the lifestyle I want to lead in life. The freedom to be able to follow any religion I please and marry whoever I choose. Also the freedom to own property and choose where to live.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Paper 2 Is it possible to make capitalism just? Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. (Wikipedia) Capitalism is a social system that focuses and is based upon the individual rights. Capitalism structures markets, determine ownership rights, and provide legal enforcement of trade restrictions which makes it an institutional system. Politically it is a system that is built on freedom.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analco English 100 Professor Kaufman 1 December 2016 Restoring Human Rights “Human rights are not a privilege granted by the few, they are a liberty entitled to all, and human rights, by definition, include the rights of all humans, those in the dawn of life, the dusk of life or the shadows of life”, stated Kay Granger. The United States has a document called Universal Declaration of Human Rights which represents different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world. The declaration consists of thirty articles which includes the right to life and liberty freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and get an education. Every individual is entitled to the same right without discrimination…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays