An Argument In Favor Of The Death Penalty

Superior Essays
Imagine a place where the whole society would run on the concept of an eye for an eye. Some people might think that it is fair and people deserve to be treated the way they treat others, but really, let us think about it carefully. Would you retaliate against a person who stole something from you? Would you ask the government to rape a convicted rapist? When it comes to vengeance in the case of theft or rape, people do not exactly want an eye for an eye. They think putting the convicted criminal in prison is acceptable for a rape or robbery, but why do they think that the death penalty is the only reasonable punishment for a convicted murderer? Why does life imprisonment not work in a murder case? In this essay, I am going to argue that the …show more content…
Some people may get closure from executions, others will move with their lives. Yet, some individuals never find peace. So, it would not be right to say that the death penalty gives closure to the victim 's family. In addition to this, the proponents of the death penalty argue that it is moral to kill the murderers. They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice. However, in my opinion, killing people can never be a humane act. Besides this, it is not always certain that all the convicted criminals are actually guilty. Some innocent people might get executed for the crimes they never did due to lack of proper evidences. If life imprisonment is practiced instead of the death penalty, such innocent people can be freed whenever their innocence is …show more content…
What about the people who could not show the evidence of their innocence because of inadequate resources? There might be many cases where innocent people were executed because they did not have enough resources and/or a good attorney. The government should be responsible for giving a better attorney and advisors to the criminal and provide them full resources to defend themselves. It should offer spiritual advisors to both, the convicted criminal and the victim’s families. In addition to this, execution should not be affected by the amount of money a person has, and the government should make sure that such inequities do not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mcadams Death Penalty

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Johnny Kormondy and two other men killed McAdams with a gunshot to the back of his head during the home-invasion robbery and raped McAdams' wife, Cecilia McAdams, repeatedly (Gardner).” Johnny was executed on January 15, 2015, and justice was served to the rest of The McAdams family. The death penalty is a good way to give families closure, cut down taxes, and the punishment fits the crime. Now in 2015, the death penalty is by lethal injection, no longer the electric chair, gas chamber, hanging, and firing squad.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the death penalty comes the expense of it. Why should the Department of criminal justice pay millions of dollars on one execution when the person who will be executed more than likely didn’t spend any money on the person that they killed? The justice departments have been using the defense that the death penalty will help to cut back on crime and use it as a deterrent effect, but in reality it does little to actually change the amount of crimes that are being committed. The book, Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies talks about how one of politicians main focuses now when discussing crime and the effects of it on the community is that they “worry about appearing soft on crime”. When determining if the death penalty is an efficient…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a government sanctioned law by which person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The crimes that result in death are known by capital offences. For example: rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder. Capital punishment was common in the past, now a days the large majority discontinued the process.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electric Chair Pros And Cons

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The death penalty has been in the United States since the first settlements were built. In that time an estimated 16,000 criminals have been put to death since the first recorded execution, back in 1608 (Ford). A amount of those criminals had killed at least one person, and good portion of them would not stop killing until they were stopped. Luckily, the criminals that were planning on never stopping, or were not able to stop, were caught and brought to justice. When the criminal is convicted, the family can feel some measure of relief about what has happened and that justice has been served knowing the criminal is off the streets.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research Essay The death penalty will always be a topic that will have controversy surrounding it. Whether you side with morality or you side with constitutionality, people will have opposing views to whether or not the death penalty is justified. Many states find themselves struggling to decide if they are pro death penalty or against, to this day 32 states inforce the death penalty while the remaining 18 find the punishment either immoral or unaffordable.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment has always been a subject that people normally do not like to talk about because people, especially the government, knows that capital punishment is an unconstitutional cruel and unusual idea. Capital punishment should be used by states to execute a prisoner, given that the evidence that is against them is substantial enough and beyond a doubt calls for a death sentence. Even though capital punishment is rare and slowly decreasing (Source A), the fact that it continues to exist is the general problem with it. Capital punishment itself would go against the 8th Amendment, saying that “…cruel and unusual punishments [would not be] inflicted” and the fact that the American government would overlook this very clear part of the Constitution is very worrisome because they could do this with many other Amendments. In my opinion, capital punishment is unjustified in every way and should not exist because the best substitute for capital punishment is lifetime in prison provided with rehabilitation options for the guiltily…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A murderer should not be able to roam the streets and perhaps commit another crime. The victims of horrible crimes should have a breathe of relief that the criminal is out of this world. Many who are not victims believe this, because they feel vengeful. They see stories on the news, or the papers, and they wonder why would someone do something so harmful as murdering an innocent. Many victims, such as Mark Klaas, believe the death penalty is a way of helping the victims move on.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Capital punishment is an issue that has been questioned on whether it is an effective method of deterrent or a flawed system. The U.S. Supreme Court declared the unconstitutionality of the death penalty as “cruel and unusual punishment” in the 1972 case of Furman vs. Georgia. A four year moratorium was put into effect evoking numerous studies evaluating the effectiveness of the death penalty. The legal proceedings involved in capital punishment is a lengthy process that concludes in either an execution, a pardon, or a lesser sentence. Crimes that are eligible for the death penalty are federal murder, treason and espionage.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Closure

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does the death penalty provide closure for the families of the victims? It has long been ingrained in society that the answer is yes. Closure is a main standing point for many who argue for the death penalty. Those people argue that the execution is justice, an eye for an eye. They claim the families find healing when they see another person die.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Those who do the crime, has to pay the penalty. I honestly do believe in the death sentence. Most people do not believe in the death sentence. Many families don’t believe in the death sentence. Most of the time, it is because they don’t want their family members to die.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Death Penalty Debate

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It’s okay to kill if it means the rest of us don’t have to be on the same planet as a person we decide can’t be rehabilitated. But what if the person we kill was wrongly convicted? And why would one want to pay triple the amount for a person who he/ she says isn’t worth trying to save? (Facts About).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mikayel Shabahzyan Death Penalty: Debate Upon the United States The death penalty is an ongoing issue in the United states that has has had many debates about the topic. While there are many supporters of the death penalty, there is a large number of people who would disagree and protest about this cause..…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays