As the years progress, scientists make scientific breakthroughs about evolution or creation. My main goal in this paper is to give 6 or more scientific facts and discoveries to help support my belief in creationism. My first scientific fact of creation is the development of intermediate species and how scientists have no fossil records of them.
Intermediate species are one of the biggest arguments a creationist can give against an evolutionist. In intermediate species the argument is if one type of animal evolved into other animals then why are there so fossil records for the in between stages of these two animals. Let's take a land animal and a marine animal for instance. If a horse which has four legs, were to evolve into a dolphin, then …show more content…
One example is a giant sperm whale fossil that was found on a mountain top in Los Angeles California. This whale fossil location was found at an elevation of 1,272 ft. This couldn't have happened unless a giant flood came like it says in the bible and washed the whale up and left it.
According to evolution, natural diamonds are believed to have been formed millions of years ago. They are originally found in the extreme temperature and pressure of the upper mantle of the earth’s crust. Diamonds have a radioactive isotope in it called carbon-14 and would not be existent if diamonds didn't have it. But according to the rate of carbon-14 decay, it is found to last about 5,730 years. Ordinarily if it were to last 5,730 years then why are diamonds which have supposedly been for millions of years still here and fine.
One of my favorite arguments is the argument that everything has to be there at once to work. For instance, if the first animal was created from one single atom it would take time to create the organ, in the time that it is making the next organ, the first organ would die off and it would be a never ending cycle. However if we were made like the bible says, humans and other species would be created in one instant. Nevertheless scientists still aren't able to explain why other creatures aren't evolving
Intermediate species are one of the biggest arguments a creationist can give against an evolutionist. In intermediate species the argument is if one type of animal evolved into other animals then why are there so fossil records for the in between stages of these two animals. Let's take a land animal and a marine animal for instance. If a horse which has four legs, were to evolve into a dolphin, then …show more content…
One example is a giant sperm whale fossil that was found on a mountain top in Los Angeles California. This whale fossil location was found at an elevation of 1,272 ft. This couldn't have happened unless a giant flood came like it says in the bible and washed the whale up and left it.
According to evolution, natural diamonds are believed to have been formed millions of years ago. They are originally found in the extreme temperature and pressure of the upper mantle of the earth’s crust. Diamonds have a radioactive isotope in it called carbon-14 and would not be existent if diamonds didn't have it. But according to the rate of carbon-14 decay, it is found to last about 5,730 years. Ordinarily if it were to last 5,730 years then why are diamonds which have supposedly been for millions of years still here and fine.
One of my favorite arguments is the argument that everything has to be there at once to work. For instance, if the first animal was created from one single atom it would take time to create the organ, in the time that it is making the next organ, the first organ would die off and it would be a never ending cycle. However if we were made like the bible says, humans and other species would be created in one instant. Nevertheless scientists still aren't able to explain why other creatures aren't evolving