Why Not Commercial Assistance For Physician Assisted Suicide

Improved Essays
In the article Why not Commercial Assistance for Suicide? On the Question of Argumentative Coherence of Endorsing Assisted Suicide, by Rowland Kipke, addresses his disapproval for physician assisted suicide (PAS) and support for commercially assisted suicide (CAS), one assisted by a psychiatrist. He states that a person who agrees with PAS must rethink their position on CAS due to physicians having a lack of mental health understanding while a psychiatrist job is to study mental health. While arguing valuable points for both sides such as mental health training and drug use, the best way to solve this dilemma is to expand the authors argument for PAS and CAS into one that allows for both types of assistance: medically assisted suicide which …show more content…
Allowing the patient to choose who they feel more comfortable seeking help from is necessary to ensure they are making the right decision. The article talks about “psychiatrists might most likely have the necessary diagnostic skills” to determine if a patient should be able to carry on with assisted suicide (Kipke, 519). This is a viable argument considering they have the training to understand a person’s mental state. This compares to a physician who is a trained medical professional that studied the anatomy and biology of how human operate. They also understand that assisted suicide is not a light, easy subject to confront and is to be taken seriously. This is a choice that comes with lots of contemplation on whether this is a correct decision to make. A big positive to having a choice is the patient has the option to confide in someone they feel safe talking to. If a patient felt safer consulting a doctor or psychologist or psychiatrist, they should have the right to decide that. If someone had to consult a professional, about ending their life due to a medical issue or something very personal, they didn’t know, it would be tough and scary for them. The patient would have to explain everything that they have gone through which wouldn’t be easy. If they had the option to could consult their doctor, it might be easier since the doctor would have been a major contender in the patient’s journey and understand what they had been through. It helps because they are a part of the full picture rather than looking in on the outside. Then there is the other side of the spectrum where if someone feels safer discussing with a mental health professional, then they have the option to talk with them. Having a choice as a patient gives them the comfort and stability they need to think clearly about their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In Michael Gill’s article “A moral defense of Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law” he defends the law against two objections by providing arguments from opponents of PAS and proponents of PAS. The first objection that Gill defends is “that it is intrinsically wrong for someone to kill herself” (2005). The second objection is that “it is intrinsically wrong for physicians to assist someone in killing herself” (Gill, 2005). The physician assisted suicide law allows terminally ill residents of Oregon who are mentally competent and have less than six months to live to request a doctor to prescribe a medication that will cause a quick and painless death.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician assisted suicide, P.A.S, has been a topic of interest for many years and the argument still stands on whether or not it should be legalized entirely in the United States. A few states, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California and Montana, have already legalized physician assisted suicide. The state of Oregon passed a Death with Dignity Act in 1996, and was the first state to make Physician assisted suicide legal. There 's an argument on both sides as to whether or not physician assisted suicide is morally right as well as whether it should be legalized throughout the entirety of the United States. There are some people who see the positive side of it; the elderly and sick will no longer be in pain and can be relieved of their suffering. However, on the other hand, if physician assisted suicide is legalized, then it can easily be abused; people can chose to die even if there are ways to treat whatever illness or problem they have. There is also the views and opinions of physicians, as they are the ones performing the procedures. Some physicians are completely comfortable performing the procedure if it is the best option for the patient and is a hundred percent voluntary. Other doctors are morally against it and do not wish to assist the patient’s suicide. Whether or not physician assisted suicide…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), has been a moral dilemma in the hot seat since the passing of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act in 1997. All throughout the US, states have been trying to pass acts that allow people to die with dignity using PAS, the most recent being Colorado. PAS is a conflicting topic because it causes concern if the choice is morally ethical for the patient and for the others making these decisions like, doctors, psychologist, and other family members. PAS can cause conflict among religion and personal beliefs but it should be seen as an individual 's right not a communal right. The article referenced within this paper is “The Role of and Challenge for Psychologist in Physician Assisted Suicide” written by Shara M. Johnson,…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Patients with depression or other mental illnesses should not have to suffer from their conditions if they have the option of physician assisted suicide. People can get so depressed or their life can change so much that they cannot go to a therapist and get the help they need. These kinds of people should be tested and showed they have a mental illness. People with mental illnesses suffer every day because they do not want to be on this Earth and have a miserable life. Instead of letting people suffer, they should let them end their lives and have a happy afterlife. Physician assisted suicide should not be limited to terminally ill patients but those with mental illnesses…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We know that people believe that if they call for help there going receive a large amount of money. The questions is are you going do it for money or the inside of your heart. Physician assisted suicide it's promoted among the issues that define por professional norms and codes of ethic. American college of physician of the society of internal medicine does not support the legalization would undermine the patient's of physician assisted suicide. The routine practice of physician assisted suicide raises serious ethical and other concern. Legislation would undermine the patient's physical relationship and the trust necessary to sustain it; alter the medical profession role in society; and endanger the value our society places in lives of disabled, incompetent and vulnerable…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Currently, there are only five states in which it is legal. He argues that instead of offering patients hastened death, doctors should instead provide care and make the patient as comfortable as they can in their final months. This issue has become very controversial and many have questioned the ethics and morals behind it. While it is nobody’s ultimate wish to die, giving this alternative gives comfort to the patient that they do not have to undergo a prolonged amount of suffering. Also, a doctors’ main goal is to help and care for their patients in any and all possible ways. By giving a way out, a doctor is not “killing” their patient, but instead making them more comfortable under the harsh circumstances. However, it is important that the strict requirements for eligibility remain intact. Physician assisted suicide should only be an option for patients during unfortunate circumstances in which they have a limited amount of time left. PAS should never be an option for people who are not terminally ill, including those with depression. This would ensure that PAS is only used for the right reasons and does not threaten the weak and vulnerable. While this is a difficult decision for any patient and their family to make, physician assisted suicide is a right that any terminally ill patient should have access…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated. Some argue that PAS is ethical. Often this is argued on the grounds that PAS may be a rational choice for a person who is choosing to die to escape unbearable suffering. Furthermore, the physician's duty to alleviate suffering may, at times, justify the act of providing assistance with suicide. This relies a great deal on the notion of individual autonomy, recognizing the right of competent people to choose for themselves the course of their life, including how it will…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many patients and doctors around the country have debated the right for physicians to assist in patient suicide. Doctors should be allowed to assist in the suicide of terminally ill patients who are suffering and are going to die regardless of the time they have left. Patients should be allowed the right to choose to live or die when cancer or some genetic disease has taken over their body. It is questioned whether this act is ethically wrong or just against someone's religious beliefs.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the word suicide is used, most people think of the gruesome gun to the head or overdose on medication. Everyone is quick to assume an act of suicide is somebody doing harm to his or herself. Not many people think of suicide as being something that a physician would help assist with, but it has definitely become a controversy over the years. Physician-assisted suicide is when a physician receives consent from a terminally ill patient to administer drugs that will eventually kill them. Before this may happen, there are a number of events that have to happen first. The patient must be informed of the alternatives, they cannot have a mental illness, and it must be a voluntary act that was not forced upon them. Physician-assisted suicide is…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death is inevitable, its part of the circle of life. So, this notion that one has the right to end their lives by undergoing voluntary euthanasia sparks debate in regard to the moral justification of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is defined as the killing of a person by the person’s own hand with the help of a physician (Vaughn 293). This is just another form to intentionally end one’s life in order to be relieved from pain and suffering. However, the Death with Dignity law made it legal for Oregonian State residents that were terminally-ill to be allowed to end their lives through physician-assisted suicide. This law permitted physicians to prescribe (not administer) lethal doses of medication to terminally-ill patients…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general. Anderson’s position is that it is a doctor’s position in society is to uphold his duties to treat the sick, to progress and direct the institution of education and research, and then follow up on that particular case of illness with the most recent and updated care all the way until the very end.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One widely made argument “is not truly fully respecting a person's "autonomy" or honoring an individual's real wishes” because those arguing against assisted suicide believe the patients are mentally ill and seeking attention for their physical and mental struggle, rather than wanting to end their lives ("Why Assisted Suicide Should Not Be Legalized"). As has been stated, many psychologists and specialists are involved in assuring that the patient is of sound mind and judgement before they will consider the patient eligible for assisted suicide. Those against suicide say that those who have been saved from suicide rarely try again and that the disorders that lead to suicidal ideation are treatable. Once again, the patients asking from assisted suicide must be of sound mind and body before they can be accepted to undergo the practice. Since the patient has passed a psychological examination, they have no mental disorder to be treated. Their second argument has to do with pain management. They say that if the pain was taken care of by “pharmacologic, neurosurgical, anesthetic, or psychological approaches”, then the patients would not feel the need to end their lives ("Why Assisted Suicide Should Not Be Legalized"). So, to sum that up, they want to…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Much similar to a family making the difficult decision of pulling the cord, it ultimately benefits the patient and it would be selfish to make their family member go through that. If they are an organ donor their vital organs can be saved and used to save other patients, and the nurse or doctor can move onto another patient that has a chance to live(This sentence is very harsh. Maybe put the health care team can help save another patient who wants to live). Another benefit is health care costs can be reduced. Advocates for physician assisted suicide say that the patients would know that it was their choice and that they were ready to die (Put they say, make it more factual. Would say leaves the reader guessing if they said it and makes it more arguable). This choice also means patients can die with dignity. Without physician assisted suicide many people may resort to committing the act themselves resulting in a traumatic event for their loved ones when they find them…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries around the world, it is legal for doctors to prescribe a medicine that can potentially end a patient’s life if the patient wishes to commit suicide. In the United States, four states -Vermont, Oregon, Washington, and Montana- are the only states which have chosen to legalize assisted suicide (Backmann par. 6). Physician assisted suicide, also called assisted suicide, has become an extremely sensitive topic that has been debated by everyone, from academic scholars to everyday people, and has become almost as controversial as abortion. After conducting extensive research, I have concluded that assisted suicide should not be legal.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The latter half of the paper will discuss a variety of different “hot topics” related to opinions on suicide. The first topic being assisted suicide. Assisted suicide commonly “consist of providing a person with the means to die; the person self-administers the death-causing agent, which is a lethal dose of medication” (G. Corey, M. Corey, C. Corey, & Callanan, 2011, p. 94). Assisted suicide has been covered by media outlets around the world and spurred legal action in some cases. The main issue to consider when discussing assisted suicide would be the ethical implications for the person “assisting”. When one thinks of assisted suicide the first thought is typically physician assisted suicide; in which a doctor assists someone, meaning to provide a lethal dose of medication that results in death. Physicians are required to take an oath to “do no harm” and many would argue that in assisting with suicide they are causing harm (death). Along with ethical issues that surround assisted suicide there are also legal issues. The legal implications for assisted suicide vary from state to state. In some states assisted suicide is illegal and legal action will be taken against anyone who is thought to have been involved in assisted suicide. However there are some states, like Vermont who was the first state in 2013 to pass a Death With Dignity Act which rules some cases of assisted suicide…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays