With if one believes in the “Big Bang Theory of Evolution” there was something to force the start of this theory. So regardless to believing in this theory complex minds have to admit that something bigger artificial life form started this Theory process. Per the Argument from desire points out, that the existence of the artificial desires does not necessarily mean that the desire objects exist. Some do; some don’t. The existence of natural desires does, in every discoverable case, mean that the object desired exist. No one has ever found one case of an innate desire for a nonexistent …show more content…
Let’s break this down, well we all know the person doesn’t exist (in a physical form) it doesn’t eliminate that the love one who is still living doesn’t feel love for the person that has passed on. Therefore, if a person can feel their love-one presents then why can’t God (whom not many has seen in a physical form) exist. The weakest point of this argument is that not everything in the Bible tells us about God and life with God is really so. But the existence of God cannot be proved or disproved. Moreover the Bible says that we must accept by faith the fact that God exists; “and without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to Him must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who earnestly seek Him”( Hebrews 11:6). If God so desired, He could simply appear and prove to the whole world that He exists. If He did that, there would be no need for faith(Does god exist?, 2014) . I relate this to the same as a child that is born, and the child doesn’t know if his or her parents love them. But the child has “faith” that it will be loved by its parents. Or in life we doesn’t know if we will be love, like or desired by others but we have faith or hope somewhere internally that allows us to seek love or desire from others. Important to mention, that with this desire is not