Argument On The Argument Of Relativity Essay

773 Words Dec 15th, 2016 4 Pages
To clarify his central theme of rejecting objectivity in moral reasoning, Mackie explains “The Argument of Relativity” which discusses the variation in moral perspectives from other societies and cultures who experience different methods of living. Since every civilization differs in living standards and their ways of life, it can be agreed that not everyone will have identical sets of moral values. As a result, this dismantles the idea of having objective moral reasoning. This is because it’s not possible for one population cannot be more right or moral than the other since they all have differentiating values. In turn, since this moral disagreement exists amongst individualistic settlements, Mackie says that it’s implausible to have a universalistic, predisposed, moral amendment with objective laws. Another point that Mackie addresses is associated with the “Argument of Queerness”. This view amplifies the idea that epistemological and metaphysical claims are not natural entities. Instead, they are queer, strange, and unlike anything that we could ever possibly encounter. Mackie reiterates that objective values are “utterly different from anything else in the universe” (Mackie 652). Throughout this argument, he stresses that this queerness calls for a different method of thinking, such as intuition or moral perception. But, there is no way to measure or obtain knowledge on the strangeness of objective values since we cannot empirically investigate whether something is…

Related Documents