When examining inclusion, it is important to take a brief look at its history. …show more content…
One of the strongest arguments for inclusion has a moral and ethical base; we as a society are constantly struggling to achieve freedom and equality, disabilities children as well. Proponents of inclusion argue that labeling segregating students is injustice that will affect the student. Several kinds of arguments have been proposed to support or oppose the value of inclusion in education for student’s learning disabilities. The first argument is the consequentiality which requires an empirical approach and focuses on various attempts to measure the positive and negative outcomes of inclusion policy. The second argument is justice, which focuses on the importance of equality and fairness in delivery services to the student. The third argument is the right to prescribed levels of quality of service, and fourth argument is the needs which focus on the students needs. That is why parents primarily have concerns about the wholesale move toward inclusion. Parents concern stem from the fact that they have had to fight long and hard for appropriate services and programs for their children. They have realized that children don’t progress academically without the support of the teacher, but teachers have neither the time, nor the expertise to meet the student’s needs. As mention, implementing inclusion into school has a huge impact on regular education teacher; teachers feel that inclusion should not be something that simply happens but rather something that requires careful thought and preparation. What the schools district doesn’t see is that children with disabilities are individual with different needs; the problem is related to the differences in ways schools and classes are taught, staffed, and managed; student that don’t learn the way they are taught, should be taught adapt the way they learn. Some children become not being able to succeed in regular classroom