Tangible Detriment: Argument For Tangible Detriment

Great Essays
Argument for Tangible Detriment: The District court improperly granted summary judgment as a reasonable jury could find that Prufrock suffered a tangible detriment when he was denied tutoring and received the worst English grade of his college career after he rejected Crewel 's offer to "take care of things" for him if he was "a good boy".(DEP.) To determine whether plaintiff suffered a tangible detriment, courts consider whether 1) plaintiff suffered a material loss and 2) the loss resulted from plaintiff 's rejection of advances. (Johnson)
Courts have defined a material loss as an adverse change to a crucial aspect of the employment or educational experience. See e.g., Bowman v. Shawnee, 220 F.3d 456, 461-462 (6th Cir. 2000); Johnson
…show more content…
Consistent with the court’s decision in Johnson where the court decided that receiving a poor evaluation was a tangible detriment as grades and evaluations were key components of an education, here, a jury could find that the drop in Prufrock’s grade was a material loss. Unlike Petrone, where the court found plaintiff suffered no material loss where she received a good grade and recommendation, here, a jury could differ and find Prufrock’s lower grade a material …show more content…
To establish this link courts consider the timing between the two. In Johnson, the court held the plaintiff’s rejection was linked to adverse action, since right after defendant said “wrong answer to give on the last day of clinical”, plaintiff received a failing evaluation, here, as soon as Prufrock rejected Professor Crewel’s advances and said “I’ll take my chances, Professor Crewel said she would not be available to Prufrock for office hours, thus in this instance a jury could find a link between Prufrock rejecting the sexual advances and being denied access to office hours. Unlike the plaintiff in Petrone, who was unable to establish a link between her professor’s advances and a material loss because she received a good recommendation and evaluation, Prufrock did not receive a good grade after rejecting Professor’s Crewel’s advances and therefore a jury a could find a link of material loss following rejection of advances. Similarly in Shrout and O’Donnell, the court found there was a link, respectively, where plaintiff was deprived of performance evaluations right after rejecting defendant’s advances, and where plaintiff lost compensation time and terminated immediately following rejecting defendant’s advances. CITE. Here, here, Crewel failed to address Prufrock’s questions with the course material in the two meetings they had, and he was effectively denied tutoring

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay # 1 – Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. In this essay, I argue against Cardoza’s ruling in the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. I disagree that the original judgment finding the Railroad Company negligent should have be overturned. I begin with a summary of the case.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, it is my contention that the plaintiff should not win the case, based on the facts provided. However, I do believe that Mr. Jackson had a legitimate case of discrimination against the WLAF and the criteria established in the McDonnell decision had been…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Darnell is a 5th grade student with a learning disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. He has an issue with impulsive and inattentive behaviors that often get him in trouble in the classroom. Darnell has been suspended 26 times for about a combination of 30 days. He was told that he would still be provided services through in home tutoring during his suspension, but during his latest suspension he had only received services once so far.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) COUNTY OF GREENVILLE ) FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) Carl Ameche, ) ) C.A. NO.: 2016-CP-23-999999 Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMPLAINT Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, ) (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) and Maple Meadows Campground, ) ) Defendants.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amy Rowley Case Summary

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Historical Setting In a 1966 amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government began providing financial aid to states that provided education for children with disabilities. The program evolved into the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) of 1970. After a couple of lawsuits and an updated Act, the government determined that students with disabilities had the right to public education, and parents had the right to participate in the process (Wright, 2010). Amy Rowley, a first-grader with an auditory impairment, and her family filed suit against her school district in the Federal District Court after the New York Commissioner of Education affirmed the school district’s decision to refuse a sign-language interpreter.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case Robertson verses Hunter Panels LLC and Carlisle Construction Materials Inc., was a civil rights – Title VII Employment – Retaliation, workplace Harassment, Gender Discrimination suit. Sandra Robertson had worked for Hunter Panels LLC since 2006. Robertson filed a lawsuit against Hunter Panels LLC and Carlisle Construction Materials Inc. in April 2013, for harassment on the job, and gender discrimination. Mrs. Robertson was fired in 2012, after telling a human resource employee that gender discrimination was a on going problem at Hunter Panels LLC (Packel, 2016). Mrs. Robertson a twenty-year veteran of the Untied States Air Force, the discrimination started after she was hired at Hunter Panels LLC.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He asserts, “Let me make it clear that I recommend giving those F’s – by the dozens, hundreds, thousands, even millions – only to students who haven’t learned the required material” (192). However giving more F’s to the students does not prove that they deserve the grade. An F should be given to the students that deserves it, such as students that do not do their homework, do not show up to class, or cheat on test/homework. If a student does things that show that they deserve the F, then it should be given. In a recent discussion with parent LaToya Jackson, a mother of two, she discussed that although the educational system has a few flaws, she feel that giving more F’s to students would not solve the problems throughout the educational system.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1997, the Texas legislature enacted a law requiring all public universities in Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school’s graduating class. The University of Texas at Austin, after finding disparities between the racial and ethnic makeup of the university's undergraduate population and the state's population, decided to modify its race-neutral admissions policy. The new policy continued to admit all in-state students who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes, however, for the remainder of the in-state freshman class the university would consider race as a factor for admissions into the university. The plaintiff, Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Texas in 2008.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, they were overlooking the appropriateness of the setting and not considering they were hampering their daughter’s educational progress by disagreeing with the proposal to place her in the ELS class. The US Court of Appeals disagreed with the parents and found she was not benefitting in any way from her current instruction and it would be doing a disservice…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some critical-conflict theorists believe that social problems arise from the major contradictions inherent in the capitalist economies. What part do guns play in a capitalist economy? This question can be answered in a few different ways, one way would be to look at the laws governing the sale and distribution of firearms. While another way, would be looking at the different companies that make the firearms. Though the role guns play in a capitalist economy can’t be defined just by the laws and manufacturers.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furlow, 04-CV-5887 Our File No. 5-987 Statement of Facts: John Brown sued his dentist, Dr. Thomas Furlow, claiming he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was infected. Mr. Brown then went on vacation and while on vacation he passed out due to infection, pain, and the infection spreading. Mr. Brown incurred medical expense and loss of wages. Furlow was served with a complaint on March 1.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of US vs. Gonzalez-Lopez lies many facts within the case. Some of the reliable facts is that a man named Cuauhtemoc Gonzalez-Lopez was charged with conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. His family hired him an attorney by the name of John Fahle to represent him but Lopez had another person in mind. Lopez went ahead and hired attorney Joseph Low to represent him in the hopes of including him with Fahle or instead of. As time went on both attorneys represented Lopez but the Magistrate Judge only accepted Low’s provisional entry of appearance and allowed him to participate only if he immediately file a motion for admission pro hac vice.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Louisiana, Lillie would be able to recover under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315, which states in pertinent part “Every act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” La. C.C. 2315 allows someone who has been wronged, to be compensated for the damage caused to him or her. In order to recover under La. C.C. art. 2315, an intentional tort must have been committed. In the present case, Joe has committed the intentional tort of battery. A battery is defined as harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case study A Matter of Honor, Sheila Allison is an African American Newton High School senior who is popular and athletic. In addition, she is a good student and received a congressional appointment to a national military academy. Soon after she received the news, Sheila is accused of plagiarizing a book review in an honors English class. Regardless of her extenuating circumstance, her teacher Mrs. Durnitz believes Sheila should be responsible for violating the plagiarism policy. The district’s policy is listed in the student handbook and states that students found guilty of plagiarism must receive a failing grade plus repeat the course.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays