Argument for Omnipotence and Divine Goodness Does God exist? A question that has raised so many questions and answers for years. To even consider someone with this title would need to hold omnipotence, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. Omnipotence means all powerful, omniscient is knowning of all things, and omnibenevolent means to be everywhere, at all times. The arguments for the paradox of omnipotence, omniscient, omnibenevolent is something people have discuss for years, however not all arguments are sound. The argument can start by stating that God is an omnipotence and omniscient but end with that he is not all good.
God can perform any action logically possible for someone to perform, I still do not find any issues thus far. We have …show more content…
I believe that the answer is yes. People’s choices impact the future of the world, whether or not to take a certain class, spiking interest in the field, studying a subject, and maybe forming that interest into a career will impact who you meet and how life goes in any given direction. There are many relationships between determinism and free will. Compatibilism is stated as possible worlds in which determinism is true and agents can often have free will. For example, two possible worlds could be pointed in the same direction and one could be completely changed by someone changing what they want for breakfast one day. This is different than practical fatalism. The definition of practical fatalism explains how the future will unfold regardless of what people choose, but the world will continue based on what exactly people choose. If we did not have free will, we would not have the chance to be generous, show our courage, and have forgiveness or …show more content…
God is absolutely possible of torturing an innocent baby for fun. He is a free being so he has the ability to choose right from wrong, when makes this being so omnipotent and perfectly morally good is that He always chooses right. This is hard for a lot of people to comprehend, but being entirely perfect and capable of anything logical can be overwhelming for many people. My objection states that people, and God has choices and that is what makes him comparable to our human population, but the difference is his perfection compared to average human
God can perform any action logically possible for someone to perform, I still do not find any issues thus far. We have …show more content…
I believe that the answer is yes. People’s choices impact the future of the world, whether or not to take a certain class, spiking interest in the field, studying a subject, and maybe forming that interest into a career will impact who you meet and how life goes in any given direction. There are many relationships between determinism and free will. Compatibilism is stated as possible worlds in which determinism is true and agents can often have free will. For example, two possible worlds could be pointed in the same direction and one could be completely changed by someone changing what they want for breakfast one day. This is different than practical fatalism. The definition of practical fatalism explains how the future will unfold regardless of what people choose, but the world will continue based on what exactly people choose. If we did not have free will, we would not have the chance to be generous, show our courage, and have forgiveness or …show more content…
God is absolutely possible of torturing an innocent baby for fun. He is a free being so he has the ability to choose right from wrong, when makes this being so omnipotent and perfectly morally good is that He always chooses right. This is hard for a lot of people to comprehend, but being entirely perfect and capable of anything logical can be overwhelming for many people. My objection states that people, and God has choices and that is what makes him comparable to our human population, but the difference is his perfection compared to average human