The proposition in which I chose to conduct research on is California Proposition 65. This proposition is also known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. This proposition was issued by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. According to the website prop 65 clearinghouse this proposition does not allow a person who is doing business in California to expose chemicals that can cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without giving a warning. Also chemicals are refrained from being near the presence of any drinking water. In doing so the state has a set standard of chemical which are allowed and not allowed. This proposition is enforced by the California Attorney General or by any district attorney or city
…show more content…
According to the website NRDC it states that this act establishes the world's most ambitious clean energy targets out to 2030, cementing California's leadership on the world stage heading into pivotal United Nations climate talks in Paris this December. This act enforces that electricity providers get their supply of energy from renewable sources for wind or solar by 2030. This means that this act pushes extremely hard for good air solutions and diverse the energy. In my analysis of this research I also think this is a great idea , due to the fact that it creates a clean air environment , but also it eliminates slowly non-renewable energy. In addition this act can affect the cost on consumers , such as retail sales of renewable energy will increase , these sales shall increase up to 50% according to the website leginfo. I disagree on the sales part of this act , I don't believe that the retail price of renewable energy should be that high of a price. This will drive consumer away, in which they will not be very delighted to convert themselves to renewable energy. Instead they would like to keep it as it is already with non-renewable energy. With efforts of changing the price of retail on renewable energy I believe this plan will help the state of California
According to the website NRDC it states that this act establishes the world's most ambitious clean energy targets out to 2030, cementing California's leadership on the world stage heading into pivotal United Nations climate talks in Paris this December. This act enforces that electricity providers get their supply of energy from renewable sources for wind or solar by 2030. This means that this act pushes extremely hard for good air solutions and diverse the energy. In my analysis of this research I also think this is a great idea , due to the fact that it creates a clean air environment , but also it eliminates slowly non-renewable energy. In addition this act can affect the cost on consumers , such as retail sales of renewable energy will increase , these sales shall increase up to 50% according to the website leginfo. I disagree on the sales part of this act , I don't believe that the retail price of renewable energy should be that high of a price. This will drive consumer away, in which they will not be very delighted to convert themselves to renewable energy. Instead they would like to keep it as it is already with non-renewable energy. With efforts of changing the price of retail on renewable energy I believe this plan will help the state of California