At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somewhat appealing, but a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. The author of this article concludes that better times are coming for all academic job seekers in the future. To support his conclusion, he states several reasons that the job opportunities will increase. However, I do not think the argument is logically convincing because of three critical flaws.
First of all, the author makes a hasty generalization. He tries to make a specific case a general fact without offering any representative evidence. To elaborate, the Waymarsh University is not representative of all universities. Moreover, no further information is offered to support the generalization. Thus, the evidence
First of all, the author makes a hasty generalization. He tries to make a specific case a general fact without offering any representative evidence. To elaborate, the Waymarsh University is not representative of all universities. Moreover, no further information is offered to support the generalization. Thus, the evidence