Argument Against Torture

Superior Essays
The use of torture in the United States should not be justified. Torture is defined as intentionally causing physical, mental, emotional and psychological discomfort to the unwilling individual in order to gain information. This involves the employment of physical assault, administering mind-altering drugs, beatings, rape and all other behaviors that may most likely inflict heavy pain and bodily harm as well as affecting the mind of human beings. Personally, I am against the act of torture that is often perpetuated by inhuman people who simply feel that they have much at their disposal and often do what is good for them. Allowing torture causes a heavy infringement on human rights. People who are subjected to torture are left suffering hopelessly …show more content…
What has been changed is the definition of torture. By today’s standards, torture is defined as intentionally causing physical, mental, psychological, and emotional pain to an unwillingly person to gain information. Methods of torture, such as waterboarding, have been long outdated and are considered primitive. Mentioned by Al Jazeera News, “According to former FBI agent and interrogator Ali Soufan, there is ‘total agreement’ that the use of torture has not prevented ‘one single terrorist attack’ in the US.” Knowing that torture hasn’t been helpful, the question becomes why these countries continue to torture if it’s not effective. With that information in mind, President Donald Trump, told CNN in an interview that he is in favor of torture and “we have to beat the savages” (Trump). Trump believes that the outdated techniques of torture are still effective and he will approve of torture. In the past, the lack of views and policies made it easy for the torturers to get away with their actions. Nowadays a political figure cannot be in favor of such action and simply get away with it without controversy. It us up to the people to decide if they are in favor of such policy or not. Thus, Donald Trump’s interview shed even more light on the topic of torture. Torture will not only waste time and resource, it will also cost the taxpayers’ hard earned money. Therefore, torture is no longer an effective and efficient method of gaining

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term “Torture” derives from the Latin word “tortus” meaning “twisted. Torture involves the intentional infliction of physical or mental pain on a person to fulfill some desire of the perpetrator or to compel some action from the victim. The following are some general definitions of torture. 1. Torture is the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Memo Analysis

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Bush’s legal counsel analyzed how far the U.S. could go to extract intelligence from those captured in the war on terror through the August 2002 memo otherwise referred to as one of the “torture memos”. The torture memos expressly justified the use of EITs to elicit information from detainees. EITs included, sleep deprivation, entomophobia exploitation, and waterboarding. These severe techniques were provided legal cover because the torture memo defined torture to be pain “difficult for the individual to endure and… of an intensity akin to the pain accompanying serious physical injury such as death or organ failure” (Greenberg 106). Additionally, John Yoo analyzed 18 USC 2430A, which makes it a crime for a person outside of the U.S.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the infliction of pain on individuals endangering the U.S., it creates a deterrent or a scare tactic towards other nations ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism."). The idea of torture strikes fear into the hearts of terrorist subjects because it can be brutal when they fail to comply. This fear deterrent now creates a robust and powerful figure for the United States, in that no organization or terrorist has any desire to attack a country that will get all information needed, and one can either suffer or give away vital information of their associates ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism)". This idea may seem completely immoral to some, however needs to be accepted. The idea of war is immensely immoral, however it is inevitable at different times throughout history.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Torture In The Military

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I found that the use of torture in the novel or the use of torture tactics of the US military does not bring the desired effect. Torture has a variety of forms but most victims were brought to hurt mentally and physically. in many cases can lead to death and permanent disability. Plus, do not bring the torture really accurate information we need because victims just want to quickly end the abuse. They may be right or wrong answer just to escape the torture and stop the pain for…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays