Argument Against Gun Ban

Improved Essays
Though this is a valid point that could arise, it does not explain why the areas with a gun ban had increased crime that was so drastic as opposed to the rest of the U.S. whose crime rate decreased. These statistics show that gun bans are quite possibly one of the worst ways to protect citizens, they could, in actuality, put people in more danger because they prevent them from using a gun as an effective mode of self defense. Some gun control supporters misconstrue the problem as just being with the gun itself when the real problem is the person who is behind it. When someone ,who is responsible and has been trained with handguns, is put behind a gun it becomes a tool for self defense and not a weapon as it does with violent criminals. What a gun ban really is, is something limits the self defense of our nation's citizens and keeps them unprotected against those who wish them harm. It is improbable that a ban will prevent criminals from getting guns, they will however, keep a law abiding citizen from legally purchasing a self defense weapon. Banning guns gives citizens less of a chance to protect themselves. A gun is the most effective form of self defense, when someone is srtipped of their right to have that is leaves them vulnerable, this is another serious problem with gun control because it gives …show more content…
These bans are ineffective and hurt Americans more than they help them, which is the opposite of the purpose of these bans. They prevent citizens from having a useful tool in their home or on their person and puts them at a great risk for being fatally wounded by a criminal. Those who own a gun are personally responsible for their actions that involve it and should be held to a certain standard, there is no perfect answer to the dilemma to the person holding the gun but it is certain that banning guns is not the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org). Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is not.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). The argument they had used to retaliate at those facts were weak. By saying, “... at least those countries are trying,” means they’re not really trying hard enough. E specially if killers are getting their hands on guns. Having gun control in those countries and people are still getting guns makes you want to fear for your life.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, the banning of handguns is the wrong decision because banning them prevents people from defending themselves properly. Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association claims that “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”(Mantel 2). If bad guys knew that other people had firearms then criminals would be more worried about getting shot while the criminals committed a crime.Therefore, if the criminal was more worried about getting shot instead of committing the crime, the crime ratings would decrease. If a good guy did not have a firearm, then the criminals would run free and not have to worry about citizens returning the fire back at them. Allowing the option to its law-abiding citizens, personal safety should be one of the top priorities in the United States.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They can not fight for this country forever.Therefor the arms embargo laws simply reduce the possibility of self-defends laws. The weapons are the most effective for self-defends. The establish of free zones is a real danger on the citizens. because criminals can do their crimes…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Its is important to know that guns do need to have some restrictions to a certain extent, but not to the point where it disarms our citizens who obey the law. Gun control cannot stop guns from getting into the hands of criminals, they will manage a way of getting guns to their desire. What seems seems to be the problem is gun control because it only hurts the ones who obey the law. We as Americans need to protect the rights of this nation to be free, gun control affects our citizens and not the…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is because “felons have often revealed that they are more deterred by the thought of running into an armed homeowner than they are of being caught by the police”(3). This is an excellent example, as Lott says, of how increased legal firearm carrying by citizens would deter criminals from committing crimes. Along with this, legal concealed gun carrying by citizens as they go about in public also protects against rape, deadly assault, and theft. In the hypothetical situation that Lott uses, if more people were encouraged to carry a concealed weapon there would be less rape, deadly assault, and theft because if there is a high percentage chance that the victim has a firearm the criminal will be less likely to commit the crime. Many criminals commit crimes against those they know do not have a way…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people. With or without gun control law; criminals will still get a hold of one. Instead of trying to enforce more gun control laws, we should focus on educating the people about the safety of gun usage and by owning a gun does have the advantages of protect not only oneself, but your…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The task at hand is saving lives by making extremely dangerous objects harder to obtain and possess. There is a very clear lack of understanding from both sides of the argument: guns can be decorative or hold importance beyond being a weapon; not every pro-regulation individual wants to steal all guns. The fact of the matter is that guns kill- they were created to kill and it is their main purpose. That is a non-negotiable fact. If guns did not kill, they would have stopped being made centuries ago.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can violate the 2nd amendment, which is of course “right to bear arms.” There has been so much in the media about gun control. The majority of the media does not show what concealed and carry is capable of in a positive way, but only the negative. People believe gun control is there to have their guns seized. There are more than enough restrictions on guns, so there for the majority of people that can have guns are safe to be around. This proven claim shows my thesis is correct by having restrictions on guns, is not stopping criminals from obtaining illegal guns, but only making it more difficult for innocent, clean slate civilians to possess…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays