Argument Against Animal Testing

The topic on animal testing is controversial, mainly between animal rights protestors. Animals are normally tested when the chemical is present to harm humans if they use them. Testing is normally made to check drugs, make-ups, and extra products that may be used on or by humans. In the efforts to mirror human diseases or toxicity by artificially creating symptoms in mice, dogs or monkeys has major scientific limitations that cannot be overcome.
With that being said, numerous reasons are present of why animal testing shouldn't exist. Factual citing of animal testing doesn't decisively demonstrate that an ingredient, when used by or on a human, will be either harmless or hazardous. Specialists estimate that more than ninety percent of the …show more content…
On the other hand, making the practice acceptable by laws and regulations, it must meet the criteria for producing the pharmaceuticals. For example, majority of the studies that are done to animals should meet specific codes of practice like in Australia and America. Australia’s Animal Ethics Committee (EAC) approves all the animals evaluations before testing begins The number of animals that can be researched on comes from this agency before they can be studied on. Alternatively, the Animal Welfare Act does this for the USA. They set the limit for all research and studies connected to animal testing. In truth, the safety of animal welfare derives from this Act. Hence, the controversy between the testing and the practice lacks the facts against the use of animals for medical testing when the argument for both fail to reflect the legal measures and set requirements that govern the practice. However, testing in animals could provide positive vaccines in a cure for other animals. In the light of this, using lab animals to test chemicals for the benefit of human medicine does not convey any positive outcomes. In fact, these regulations are set out to make animals products of today’s