Arguing Research Paper

Improved Essays
Arguing and debating are two topics that can come off as offensive, yet have two totally different meanings. Debating is a healthy way of communication, and looking at topics from few to several points of views. Although, a good majority of people are just stuck in the concept of being right, with no interest of communication at all. Let me give you some reasons to enlighten you as to why this sort of thing happens. First let me start off with Debating. Debating is to consider a possible course of action in one's mind before reaching a decision. Now, let's break that down. To consider is to think about and be drawn toward. So in debating, you're considering what someone is saying and you try to put yourself in the position that they are speaking from. …show more content…
Arguing is to exchange or express diverging or opposite views, typically in a heated or angry way. Now lets again, break this down. Heated is to be inflamed with passion or conviction. To arguing, you are becoming more angry as time progresses. Arguing is when someone has no interest in being wrong once so ever. Most believe they have a higher authority and can just be right. Arguing is not good for the mind nor blood pressure.That's why I prefer not arguing. Now lets combine the two. Arguing and debating could be used in the same category, but it's often not a good thing to do. Debating is healthier for the mind to open up and think. Arguing just seems to shut the mind down, and focuses on just one thing, which is being right. Debating is better because you will at some point see a topic from a different view. Debating should come with questions and evidence to back up statements. That way, a good environment is created. People have always confused arguing and debating. Sure they can be used together, but is that really a good thing? Unless you want to end up like Donald Trump, you probably shouldn't consider trying

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Book about Rhetoric: is it Worth Reading? Jay Heinrichs is a New York Times best selling author thanks to his book, Thank You For Arguing; what Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us about the Art of Persuasion . He is a leading expert in the study of persuasion and applies his knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos to construct his position. Heinrichs also brings to play what he has learned from his 25 year long career as a journalist, as well as his lifelong study of rhetoric and applies it to his book.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study of rhetoric today is dying. Thank You for Arguing wants to change that. By introducing rhetoric as a useful everyday tool Thank You for Arguing hopes to revive the mass knowledge and use of rhetoric in everyday conversations. Thank You for Arguing is an excellent book and by giving excellent examples combined with emotion and tools to use logic in an argument it excels in introducing such a vague concept as rhetoric and should have continued use in schools. Thank You for Arguing, written by Jay Heinrichs in February of 2007, brings rhetoric into another light that appeals to the common person that continues to hold a place on Harvard’s top 10 reading list because of its value.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Argument

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My second most popular reason for arguing was to inform the other party, although, I only made two arguments to inform. My arguments…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his article “Argumentation in a Culture of Discord”, Cioffi criticizes the way our contemporary media view argument and offer s his own perspective on view argument and argumentation. On our contemporary media view argument, Cioffi believes that our current media fail to offer a forum for actual genuine debate: they are neither pursuing real inquiries nor grappling with complex puzzle. Instead what they offer is the easy route: they provide two sides of arguments and the audience have to pick one over another. In other words, the media way of arguments fail to take counter-arguments into consideration. Thus, the problems arise with the media definition is that our younger generations fail to understand the concept of “arguments” proposed…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stuart Greene’s article Argument as Conversation was an insight on how arguments go hand in hand with most conversations whether to inform or to prove a point. He starts by inferring that arguments don’t have a time line but are continuous. We use past, present, and future information to reinforce our side of the argument. Greene quotes Kenneth Burke’s example of an argument which states, if you walked up to people arguing, the topic of that conversation has been going on long before you got there and will continue even after you leave. Greene also explains if you want to jump into that argument you should identify the situation and not just be able to frame your points of your argument, but have good counter questions which makes your argument…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wood says, “argument seeks to establish what is probably true as well as what might be expedient or desirable for the future” (124). This provides emphasis for what the purpose of an argument is. The entire chapter revolves around the idea of an argument, therefore Wood purposely explains what an argument from that. From there, the reader is able to understand that there is no need to argue…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts are faced every single day, but how you approach them can make an enormous difference. According to the law of attraction, if you adopt a positive attitude, good things happen to you, whereas a negative attitude always attracts negative. Having a positive attitude let’s both sides express their opinions, dismisses the unpleasant ideas in one’s mind, and surprisingly can directly affect your life! According to a study done by Dutch students, people having a positive outlook had a seventy-seven percent lower risk of heart disease than pessimists. Also, in StudySync when Anne Frank and Louise engaged their conflicts with a positive attitude, they felt that they had not lost everything and still had hope.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I refrain from making hasty decisions, a trait that’s made it easier to manage time and keep my life organized. It’s not that I don’t enjoy some spontaneity, just that I’ve had experience with faulty planning. I like to consider as many details and possible outcomes of a situation before making a decision; in fact, I believe it’s my best characteristic. Thinking things through allows me to make sound, satisfying choices in both my academic and social life. It is a practice that has saved me from careless mistakes on math tests and kept my activities.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this style of arguing, it is very difficult to get anywhere. Both parties will more than likely shut down and avoid reaching an agreement. Tannen wrote “More and more these days, journalists, politicians, and academics treat public discourse as an argument -- not in the sense of making one, but in the sense of having one, of having a fight.”. She thinks that arguments now are…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most important thing that I have learned from these chapters is how to engage in civil political discord on the issues that we are facing today. In a time when there is very little positive discord in Washington among politicians there. Using the Heie's approach means that we can begin to look for ways to communicate with those we disagree with in a more polite fashion. We must realize that truth telling is a very important part of winning over those we seek to influence. One of the most difficult things is to end a heated conversation with someone who you disagree with.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both parties present reasoning arguments that lead to no simple answer that they can agree upon. Considering the two sides, a hybrid…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Argument as Conversation,” Stuart Greene attempts to convince readers that an argument is a conversation. When most people think of arguments, they tend to think of them as being a negative thing. Stuart Greene is trying to have people realise that arguing is used in conversations to move it along, keep it interesting and to also inform people. He tries to focus on how an argument is not to a way to dispute someone, but rather an ongoing conversation with that person.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, recently I read Deborah Tannen's 1994 essay "The Triumph of the Yell", in which she laments the deterioration of modern-day debate due to its over-combative nature. She argues that framing debates as a fight between opposing extremes obstructs the truth rather than bringing it to light. While I was reading it, I couldn't help but think of the anime fan community (as well as the gaming community, and the sad state of U.S. politics) and the "debates" that take place within it. Far too often, they turn into unintelligible battles of ad hominem attacks and self-serving logic, rather than anything of real substance. Much of this boils down to the idea that anyone who doesn't agree with you is either a "fanboy" or "elitist".…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of which side you’re on , every argument has three basic steps one should follow to be successful. The first step is to stimulate emotion , the second is to change the opinion of the crowd , and the third…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Normally when we are in agreement , it is easy for us to behave properly with each other. However when we are in disagreement, we do not always behave properly. What make it worse is when people try to justify their misbehavior by pretending that they Before talking about the etiquette of disagreement , First are very religious. People who do this pretend that they are very concerned about the deen of Allah. When in reality, they are just ignorant of the teachings of Islam and Islamic behavior .clarify the definition of disagreement.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays