Are We Naturally Good Analysis

Improved Essays
You may look at different aspects of your life, think that you have a happy life and that you are a good person; that may be true because we are currently civilized. On a much larger scale, humans are not naturally good, the darkness of humans’ hearts are masked by civilization. In The Lord of The Flies, by William Golding, he describes that no matter how much we try to disguise our evil - which we are born with - it is destined to resurface when we have either lost control of ourselves or put under difficult circumstances. But many people may still argue that humans are naturally good… then why do we have to teach babies to be good? If the people who have been least influenced by the world - newborn babies - are supposed to be pure of sin, …show more content…
But that is not necessarily true; if you have spent any time with a baby, you would probably catch yourself constantly telling them to stop doing something or to act in a civilized manner. But then if babies - the humans who are new to the world and least influenced by “the world’s evils” - are good… why are they being taught to be good? The fact that we humans are told how to be good proves that we simply can not be good when we are alone, as shown in The Lord of the Flies. In The Lord of The Flies, by William Golding, Golding shows us what happens when civilization vanishes and human nature takes over. When the boys getting rescued, Golding states “Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man’s heart…” (Golding 182) this proves that even though Ralph was saved from the island and the traumatic moments, he will still not be the same. Ralph was weeping because he finally learned about the evil that is in our …show more content…
An authour at Brown University, Deborah Baum, wrote an article about the “Warrior Gene”, also known as “Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA).” Baum states that people with the warrior gene tend to “exhibit higher levels of behavioral aggression…” (Baum) in comparison to someone without Monoamine Oxidase A. Baum also mentions that you do not need to have the “Warrior Gene” to be necessarily violent and if you have the gene, it does not mean that you will be very violent; having the gene only states that you will be prone to more violent behaviours when provoked. This shows that though many of us are already prone to violent behaviours, some of us are genetically prone to violent actions. Furthermore, humans have always been violent; during the Paleolithic age, humans killed animals to have food and so did Jack - in The Lord of The Flies. Although many may argue that humans in the Paleolithic age and Jack only killed animals to survive and that they did not have a choice, that can be easily argued. Humans, in the 21st century, do not NEED to eat animals or consume any animal by-products to survive or to have a healthy lifestyle. About 490.000,000 people (about seven percent of the world) identify themselves as a vegan, being vegan means you can not consume or purchase any products that have been produced by an animal. This proves that humans are still evil because they kill innocent beings even if they do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Both Sherman Alexie’s “Superman and Me” and Eudora Welty’s “Clamorous to Learn” share their experiences and beliefs about how literacy impacted them. “Clamorous to Learn” has a much less “formal” tone compared to “Superman and Me”. While both authors use style elements in their excerpts to connect to the audience in an emotional way “Clamorous to Learn” uses antimetables and metaphors while “Superman and Me” uses repetition. Sherman Alexie narrates the memories he has as child reading, and how literature influenced him to become a writer to carry on what he learned to his audience. In paragraph seven, he says “I read the books I borrowed from the library.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the book Candide, human nature is debated and argued whether humans are mostly warlike and cause violence or that we are naturally born good, and that it is just our current state that makes us warlike. Candide suggests that humans cause violence almost everyday and every minute and almost every man and in the book is warlike. Almost every kingdom in Candide is at war and in this century, and small battles are very common. Although, the author of Candide, Voltaire, shows a great deal of violence, he argues that we are born good, without dangerous war instincts. In an article “Human Behavior: Killer Instincts” by Dan Jones, it is argued and scientifically shown that humans are not naturally violent.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As far as science is concerned they have minimally proved that humans are somewhat violent by nature. We are a warring species that will amass entire populations embedded against each other. No other species on earth does this besides ants and primates. I believe that there is variability when it comes to each person's level of violence. Look at Gandhi or the Dali Lama, these two souls although may of harbored some form of disgust in there heart at one point or another choose to take a road of peacefulness and serenity.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good or bad? This is a question asked by thousands of people, of all walks of life at some point in their life. What is it that humans are, are we good and benign souls bent on compassion and kindness? Or are we just evil twisted beings waiting for something to flip our switch to start hurting people and ourselves? I believe that humans are good, because they know how to help each other in tough times, and we also know how to unify ourselves in dire situations.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hugo Grotius found his first serious challenge towards Natural Law posed by Euphemus, a nonbeliever, who stated that Justice always favors the powerful and “…no state can be governed without Injustice” (Grotius p. 77). Euphemus believes that the only determinant of Justice was war, itself and, “…nothing is more frequent than the mentioning of Right and Arms…” (77). Grotius fires back at Euphemus’ argument, borrowing from a Christian writer who states, “Fraud, Cruelty, Injustice, are the proper Business of War” (78). From this quote, Grotius is attempting to prove that, not only does he find war bad, but even Christians see it as a terrible means to determine Justice. He backs this claim up even more by using a quote from a Comedian, “You that attempt to fix by certain Rules things so uncertain, may with like Success strive to run mad, and yet preserve your Reason” (78).…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People are not born morally wrong. They are born with the least cultural influence because at birth they neither have lots of friends nor attend schools, which means their minds are innocent. It is evident that babies always reach for the things they like or want. Most of these things are often good rather than evil. Personal Rationale…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They Say I Say Analysis

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the book, “They Say, I Say” chapter fourteen discusses the necessity for tertiary education. The fundamental focus of chapter fourteen is to determine whether or not higher education offers the bang for your buck. The chapter initiates disputes beginning with the article, “Are Colleges Worth The Price of Admission?” by Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus. This article conveys a controversial issue of the rising cost of admissions and the descending quality of college education.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Good Natured by Frans de Waal, de Waal adopts a perspective seeking to understand attributes and behaviors of humans and other animals by linking them to an organism’s ability to survive. This standpoint is one known as the evolutionist perspective. De Waal says this about aggression: “a behavior that is universal in the human species, and widespread in the animal kingdom, simply cannot be as detrimental as social science would have us believe. There must be advantages associated with it.” Aggression allows humans to develop morality, it tells us when it is acceptable to act a certain way; whether we should allow our emotions to take control or if we need to take a back seat.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Publication Information: Rose, Mike. "I Just Wanna Be Average. " Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. By Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or we can say that it is some mental imbalance that caused a person to become that way. Obviously every situation is different. Some more obvious than others. What I took away from this exercise is the fact that there seems to be a “violent gene”. I’m not sure I believe it though.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Are Babies Born Good

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Are babies born good or taught to be good? Throughout the years many psychologist have gone to try to test to see whether babies are born with innate morals or taught it has been difficult to test babies because they cannot communicate like older children can. They used many different scenarios such as using puppets to illustrate different behaviors and the babies had to chose which one they felt like was good or bad. With that I believe children aren’t necessary taught but they do what they see their parents do, and they feel that is the correct way to do things. Psychologist also do believe babies are born with morality they start to feel sympathy as early as six months.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At first glance, moral good humans appear to appeal to the well thought out philosophical view; the truth of moral judgments is relative to the innate sense of whether a human is morally good or morally bad at birth. The basic definition of morally good and bad is that all moral points of view are equal, no one has morals that are any righter or wrong than any other person in this world. As you look closer at the points people use to justify their claims, you can plainly see that there are, more often than not, viable objections that can be made against any of the arguments for morally good, bad, and neutral. Humans born morally good suggest that a baby is born with an innate sense of morality. For example, researchers at Yale University begin…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, in the novel Frankenstein, the monster had honorable intentions and he sought to do what was right, but the world would not accept him for who he was. This infuriated the monster and as a result, he killed numerous people. Consequently, babies are innocent and cannot identify the difference between right and wrong. Therefore, they need to be taught this concept; society can warp this truth which can cause them to eventually become corrupt and have differing views. On the other hand, if they are taught the difference between right and wrong and this concept is not skewed they will eventually become upstanding individuals in society.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As quoted from Abraham Lincoln, “Human action can be modified to some extent, but human nature cannot be changed.” The novel, The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, tells about a group of English boys who land on an inhabited island after a plane crash. After realizing there are no adults around, the boys attempt to create their own society while waiting for rescue. Although the boys are rescued in the end, their lives were destroyed throughout the course of the book. This novel clearly shows that children, or the human race in general, are evil and savage like animals, by nature.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A contentious debate has occurred in regards to how problems can be caused by a good child and the fact that there are implications of being the good child. ‘The Dangers of the Good Child’, a didactic opinionated feature article by The School of Life (The School of Life, 03/17) contends that there are dangers to being the ‘good child’. Comparatively, a direct response to this piece, ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ contends that perhaps there is a point in being the ‘naughty’ child. The School of Life initiates their piece by using the anaphora of ‘they’ to generalise the good child and their monotonous righteousness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays