Are We Intrinsicly Good Or Evil

Decent Essays
Are we intrinsically good or evil? In what ways can we control our moral virtue or our wicked nature? What makes us righteous or vile? For many years, psychologists are trying to seek answers to these questions and are exploring different aspects of the human nature. Apart from psychologists, philosophers such a Thomas Hobbes have a different view on human nature. Many people believe that according to Hobbes humans are naturally evil, however, my reading of the Leviathan disapproves this belief. In this essay, I will argue the Leviathan does not portray humans as naturally evil nor naturally moral.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes’ paper “The Leviathan”, he asserts that all people are inherently evil and the only way to control the malicious side is with absolute power. Hobbes’ philosophy that everyone has a malicious…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A counter narrative can be seen to arise over the very nature of man itself. A negative conception of the nature of man arguably erodes all the work done allowing for man to maximise himself within a state and paints the role of systems and states in an entirely different light. For many theorist man is inherently destructive or evil and a “leviathan” (Hobbes, 1661) must be required to stop man from self-destructing.. Augustine of Hippo states that humans are all inherently sinful due to original sin. Original sin is "the tendency to sin innate in all human beings” (Treier, 2006).…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Chinese Confucian philosopher, Mencius, human nature is good. He believed that we are all inherently good and with time, people become better. In this paper, I will elaborate on Mencius’ views on human nature and reasons why he thinks people have intrinsically good nature. Second, I will introduce Xunzi’s argument on his negative views of human nature. His beliefs are that people are morally blind and emphasizes the importance of rituals, sages, and teachers in the world.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both grappling with regional instability and constant war, arrive at different frameworks for handling man’s inherent propensity for conflict from very similar models of human behavior. Hobbes, watching his fellow countrymen fight each other during the English Civil War, decided that humans perpetually desire more power to secure their well-being and therefore incline toward warfare as a means to achieve this. Machiavelli, similarly accustomed to the restless Italian Peninsula, also labeled man as power-hungry and self-centered, always striving for enough freedom to ensure one’s prosperity. In the absence of the structure and organization provided by a government, a situation dubbed mankind’s ‘natural…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the chapter assigned, Hobbes describes a number of different manners, which he defines as the ways that mankind manages to live together in harmony. In this paper, I will argue that the purpose of this passage is to explain to the reader that the reason for these different manners is that each man seeks to continually secure himself, but no one knows the best way to do so because of lack of certainty of what the future holds. This lack of certainty, without the aid of the knowledge of natural causes, gives rise to religion. Finally, this religion is used as a tool with which to govern. Then, I will use examples from the text to show how this fits into Hobbes’s ultimate assertion that to escapes the State of Nature, man creates the Leviathan.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Renaissance people shifted their focus to explore themselves. Humanistic values became more and more common in this time period. Philosophical thinkers were hard at work exploring the questions of life. One of the main questions is one that is still addressed today. The question is whether or not human nature is inherently good or evil.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Thomas Hobbes was a pessimist towards human nature, strongly believing that humans were born greedy and hostile. To support his perceptions, Hobbes wrote Leviathan,…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For as long as the human race has existed, the dispute over humanity being innately evil or innately good has been a hot topic of debate. This has been a recurring topic for the reason, that is, plain ignorance; people refuse to believe that humans are born with a sense of evil, yet there are copious amounts of evidence that prove this to be true. Hypothetically speaking, if humans are born with innate goodness, then why does our world still suffer from severe cases of poverty, rape, war, and overall evil? Why do we allow these terrors happen, when we, as humans, have the power to stop it?…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout humanities's relatively short time on Earth, the question of whether human nature is naturally good or evil has been a seemingly unanswerable one. It would be simple to posit that the principle flaw of humanity lies in our Jekyll and Hyde nature, our capability to display both our goodness or evil at any time, but this is not true. The greatest flaw of humanity is its propensity for evil, violent and amoral behavior that has been ubiquitous in human society with acts of “good” interspersed only at points where it serves our own progression. This is because human nature is inherently violent and evil, and the implementation of educational systems, laws, and religion in an attempt to change human nature have been ineffective at every juncture. Even the incredible scientific advances made by human kind have been a practice in futility, the best of which have made life easier, but the most significant of which have been…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern day and age it is hard to see beneath the human skin of appearance, to see a person’s real flaws or abilities. What is the real reason for the flaws of humanity? Is it nature that forms a man’s personality and morality or is it nurture? John Locke suggested that man was born with no particular inclinations toward good or evil and that life “writes” a man’s personality and character on that slate. Others argue that man is born either “good” or “evil” and that his personality is formed before his first breath.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being Inherently Good This has been a long argument for many years that people have tried to pin point an answer to. Not only has there been many debates on being inherently good or evil there is much evidence that humans are inherently good. Human nature means the ways of thinking, feeling and acting that are common to most people. It is our base mentality to be inherently good.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay we have solely looked at a group of great thinkers who believed that human nature were coherently bad, with the exception of Darwin who believed that humans lie somewhere in the middle of the spectrum. Interestingly all these men had different reasons to justify their views. Aurelius believe that humans were bad because they simply did not know better. Darwin who’s view of human nature was strangely compassionate considering that his theory of evolution meant that humans were no different, nor any more special than any other species, he seemingly views humans in the general middle of the scale. Freud arguing we are bad because of our unconscious instincts caused them to be destructive, cruel and selfish unless…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual has a different understanding of what the word “bad” or “evil” mean. If one person believes that stealing is bad, another person might believe that stealing is a good thing if it serves the greater good, for example, Robin Hood. The words “bad” and “good” are subjective and can vary in people’s views. Yet, by looking at the world today, it is difficult to say that humans are naturally good. However, when a child is brought into this world, one tends to associate them with purity and innocence.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout centuries of philosophy, people have been contemplating the effects of nature versus nurture. Are people born with the ability to live with unselfish concern, then corrupted by society? Or are humans essentially evil. If so, how does one define what is good or bad? Considering the subjectivity that follows humanity 's perception of altruism, it is arguable that humans are simply an amalgamation of the environment they are exposed to.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays