Are we, as Singer seems to think, always morally obligated to do the most good that we can, or are some acts of charity/altruism "above and beyond" the call of duty?
We as Humans are obligated to do most good if we can. For example singer gives the example of the child drowning in situation like that doing the right thing is forced upon you. If you know as a person that you are able to help to save the child’s life from drowning if you just try you are obligated to do so. Although let’s say you don’t know how to swim there for jumping in the water would get both of you killed so just let the kids die if you got no other choice to call someone that can help. However I disagree on singer’s idea that we must give most of our money away to
We as Humans are obligated to do most good if we can. For example singer gives the example of the child drowning in situation like that doing the right thing is forced upon you. If you know as a person that you are able to help to save the child’s life from drowning if you just try you are obligated to do so. Although let’s say you don’t know how to swim there for jumping in the water would get both of you killed so just let the kids die if you got no other choice to call someone that can help. However I disagree on singer’s idea that we must give most of our money away to