Argumentative Essay: Are More Laws The Answer?

Great Essays
Are More Laws the Answer?

BANG!!! A shot is fired into a crowd. Police rush to the scene and handcuff the criminal, who was immobilized by a bystander’s shot. The man who was carrying a concealed weapon is being praised by police and other bystanders for stopping a crime from being committed. Should he be praised though? Or should this act of valor be treated as a crime also? Everyday owners of guns make choices to use their weapons in a responsible way or an irresponsible way. On one side of the argument is gun advocates and gun owners. On the other side are groups pushing for stricter gun laws. There are many pros and cons of each side, but no side is willing to give in to any of the others demands. Gun rights advocates do not want any change in the laws that are currently in place. Many of the laws in place protect gun owners and their rights to own and carry firearms. Advocates for gun rights most commonly cite the second amendment for their support, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (“The Constitution of,” Amendment 2). This right is guaranteed in their minds and can not be overturned because of new advancements in technology or isolated incidents, but gun
…show more content…
According to a timeline of important events concerning gun control three notable shootings are , Columbine, where a dozen students and one teacher were killed by two shooters, Virginia Tech, where thirty students were killed in a lecture hall by a shooter, and Aurora, where a gunman entered a movie theater and opened fire, killing twelve and injuring fifty-eight (“Gun Control Timeline” 4-6). Many advocates for gun control say that stricter laws concerning gun ownership, storage, and registration could have prevented these tragedies and others like them. They also connect the presence of guns in an area to crime

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    School Shootings Are Not Enough for Stronger Gun Control Laws The Jonna Semeiks article “We the People Confront Sandy Hook” discuses many different factors that contribute towards explaining why school shootings and gun violence are inadequate to inspire stronger gun control laws. The deaths of children are not enough to offset the strong ties that American society has towards guns as a symbol of freedom, which causes people to respond with internal defense mechanisms that numb the pain of these tragic events instead of feeling a need to take corrective action. Semeiks presents a valid point that gun control reforms are needed; however, in order for that to happen anytime soon, the American people will need to largely shift their attitude on this topic. The author provides several examples successfully supporting that main idea.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy of guns is a never ending battle in both the political and social world. Although gun violence has been on a dramatic decline since the 1990’s more specifically from 725 people per 100,000 falling victim to gun violence in 1993 to a relative low of 175 in 2013. With this information, the question arises as to why do we care so much about guns now? Although individual crimes involving guns have decreased, the rate of mass shootings occurring in the United States is sending shivers down the spines of all Americans. Not one individual feels secure in the land of the free.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Permit holders are law abiding, committing firearms violations at a rate of hundredths of 1%” (Lott, “Guns in schools can save lives,” par. 6). If one does not feel comfortable with a gun, they should not be required to carry one, but the right to protect yourself should never be taken away. With all the gun violence in the world, it should be encouraged to get a concealed carry, not looked down upon. Andrea Noble, a staff writing for The Washington Times shows law officials perspective on this issue: “The vast majority of officers also believe legally armed citizens are important in the reduction of crime rates” (Nobel, par. 4). Officers realize that there is usually not enough time to arrive at the crime scene before the violence occur.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet the newspapers did not publicized this incident, as it happened two days prior the Sandy Hook incident, how much more difficult would it be for the next human degenerate to inflict harm or murder on innocent civilians with the knowledge of how he would be met by normal, gun-carrying, citizens (Machaud) A criminal premeditating the idea of shooting down dozens of civilians might then take a step back and consider the fact that if they really should risk their life in an attempt to extinguish the life of others. The ability to carry a firearm is not only a protection for yourself, but also serves as protection for those who are not carrying firearms around you. In the article, The Second Amendment is all For Gun Control, Adam Winkler writes to persuade his readers that gun control has always been a part of the 2nd Amendment in the United States Constitution. The 2nd Amendment is about the right to bear arms, the right we have as American citizens to carry a firearm as protection.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Constitution. The entire text of the Second Amendment is “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Some people believe that ever since America has maintained a standing army, militias have become obsolete, and therefore the Second Amendment may now be ignored. However, the framers of the Constitution clearly wanted the citizenry to be armed.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most topical issues in United States is gun control. The issue has reached the supreme court over and over again, and many different people have different stances on it.. The basis of is the Second Amendment, written in the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S. Const.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Debate

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution composes an implicit part of citizen’s safety. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the large amount of mass shootings in the United States sparking outrage from the people who advocate for increased gun control, a large point of issue within the government has been whether or not to increase restrictions on gun ownership. One side believes that reducing the amount of guns would cut down tremendously on the amount of mass shootings, while the other side believes that the amount of mass shootings would not be affected due to how people who want guns will still be able to obtain them. McKirdy, Euan, and Paul Armstrong. "Mass Shootings Preventable?…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mitigating crimes can be both an effective tool in gun control, as well as a desired outcome. A study conducted by Bartley and Cohen states that implementation of right-to-carry laws cause a decrease in violent crimes, while increasing the rate of nonviolent crimes. The increase of the latter is attributed to a criminal’s risk-reward evaluation. (Bartley and Cohen, 1998). With this evaluation in mind, it is easy to see that a criminal is less likely to commit violent crimes due to the uncertainty of encountering a victim who may be armed.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays