Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Case Study

Improved Essays
Drill Baby Drill The Federal Government should release the 19 million acres of land known as ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) out of protection from oil drilling. The need for oil now outweighs the predicted environmental impact. Drilling will improve the national economy, in addition to reducing our dependency on foreign countries for this good. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is estimated to sit on 10.4 billion barrels of crude oil with a five percent chance of being 16 billion. This quantity is enough to provide oil products for the U.S. for just over two years. Drilling in ANWR would provide a safe source of energy for a short term.
While the National Unemployment Rate is slowly improving, the numbers are somewhat inaccurate due to the fact that after a long enough period of being unemployed people stop reporting their status. “ Our country has also seen an increase in the homeless
…show more content…
The readily argued caribou migration routes are moot points in this discussion, with about 200 miles of coastline not affected by drilling. Naturally, people have seen the negative large scale effects of oil pollution for example the spill in the Gulf of Mexico. However, “Energy companies have figured out how to drill wells with fewer toxic chemicals, enclose wastewater so it can't contaminate streams and groundwater, and sharply curb emissions from everything from truck traffic to leaky gas well valves.” This means drilling would only last two years with small effect to wildlife and no effect to groundwater or fear of chemical

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Modern societies throughout the world are dependent on oil and gas. Without these two resources America would have never experienced the Gilded Age that made America the industrial powerhouse that it is today. Not only do these resources supply us with transportation and countless other material items but because of how large the industry is it accounts for tens of thousands of jobs within the three sectors of the industry. Every year oil and gas are becoming rapidly more important.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jimmy Carter writes, “tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge,” to describe what industrialization will do to the Arctic National Wildlife refuge. The general argument in Carter’s forward is that this Arctic refuge should not be developed for industry. First, he uses facts and evidence to build his claim. Then he uses word choice and imagery to support his argument. His purpose is to persuade his audience that development will have negative consequences for the Arctic refuge, in order to protect this unique awe inspiring wildlife refuge.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay Question

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The companies won’t stop until there is no oil, taking over the land. ANWR hosts a numerous amount of wildlife, which means every part of the reserve should stay a part of the reserve. According to document E and https://www.fws.gov/alaska/fisheries/endangered/species.htm some animals like the polar bear, Northern sea otter, Short-tailed albatross, Eskimo curlew, and shaggy musk ox just to name a few that are endangered or are threatened to be endangered. That means if we take over even a bit of the reserve they eventually cause the animals to go extinct. There is a chance there is no oil.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oil is a very important part in our live. But some people don't even acknowledge this. People want more and more oil. Canadians uses twice as much oil then ever. In 1980 people use nearly 1.8 million gallons but now they use nearly 3 million gallons.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a foreword to Subhankar Banerjee's book, former President Jimmy Carter makes an argument against allowing drilling and industrial activity in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In his defence of his position, Carter effectively uses a combination of factual evidence, style, and appeals to emotion to persuade the reader of his ideas. Carter starts the foreword off by describing a time when he went to the Arctic Refuge with his wife, and recounting all of the Refuge's natural beauty, from the "brilliant mosaic" of plant life to the "spectacle" of caribou migration. This use of imagery helps create the feeling that the Arctic Refuge is sacred and beautiful, and therefore deserving of protection; this is a form of emotional appeal; his description of this in the form of a narrative also makes him feel more genuine and relatable.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gasland Documentary

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After watching the documentary, Gasland, I was curious and wanted to know if any of the harms of hydraulic fracturing are coming to my resident state of North Carolina. Allowing hydraulic fracturing to be practiced in North Carolina would threaten our waters. Harmful wastewaters can spill and pollute our lakes and rivers. These toxic chemicals can leak into our drinking water and the methane gas being released during the drilling process can end up in tap water, putting on the rick of…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As stated in document E the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is one of the “…largest sanctuaries for artic animals…” as well as a “…vital birthing ground…” for many animals such as “…polar bears, grizzlies, Artic wolves, caribou…” and even endangered species like “…shaggy musk ox…”. Advocates for the oil drilling claim that the Arctic refuge “could be developed by disturbing as little as 2,000 acres” out of the “1.5 million-acre coastal plain”. However, what the advocates fail to mention is that the “…oil refuge isn’t concentrated in a single…” area, but instead is “…spread across the coastal plain in more than 30 small deposits”. These small deposits “…would fragment the habitat…” and disturb and displace wildlife. Additionally, as demonstrated in document A since the Alaskan pipeline is as close as fifty miles to the western border of the refuge they would eventually move into the refuge to drill.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adapted from former US president Jimmy Carter, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Season of Life and Land a Photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee. Jimmy Carter and Subhankar Banerjee wrote the book or essay about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Jimmy Carter only wrote the foreword of the Essay though. Subhankar Banerjee wrote the rest of the Essay himself. This is about how the oil plant would destroy the Wildlife Refuge.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone who has spent a prolonged period of time in the wild and has enjoyed the experience of observing the world in it’s natural habitat can see the importance of preserving our wildlife. In Jimmy Carter’s attempt to save the wildlife refuge in Alaska he uses reasoning, evidence, the past, and personal experience in the wild. Carter argues that preserving this extraordinary pure land in it’s “pure, untrammeled state” would be a “Great triumph for America”. Jimmy Carter starts by exonerating the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and describing its natural beauty and magnificence. He does this to get the reader to relate and use their own experience in nature to start a sense of credibility towards what he is writing.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefor after much consideration and research I would have to side with pro drilling. Allowing drilling to begin will only further secure our independence from foreign oil that places our nation in economic and political danger. It will substantially increase economic activity in multiple industries, as well as create new much need employment. And improve upon technology alongside research and development. The only way offshore drilling can become most effective and productive is if the commutation and cooperation between scientist, oil companies, communities and the government is…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dangers Of Fracking

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The myth is Oil companies create jobs by drilling more wells. The reality is while oil giants claim it will create 150,000 jobs only about 25% will be directly hired per year. A gas well only requires about thirteen full time employees during the year when drill is completed at the site the jobs drop to around 0.1% for full time jobs. A study from the university of Montana titled “ The local Economic Impacts of Natural Gas developed in Valle Vidal, New Mexico found that the employment level in Colorado Raton Basin was .12 jobs per well” It only takes about a year to drill and extract the gas from a well, after that the jobs drop to a minimum. When a big company moves to a new location local entrepreneurs start small trucking companies to transport the drilling material and water to well sites.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Past VS Future: The Dakota Access Pipeline The Dakota Access is a pipeline that will carry 7.4 billion barrels of oil a day to be used from North Dakota to Illinois. The pipe will run under 22 bodies of water, and one of them is Lake Oahu in South Dakota. Lake Oahu is the main water source for the Standing Rock Reservation, and the Native Americans living there worry the pipe might pollute the lake and disrupt sacred burial grounds. The Dakota Access will provide us oil in places where we need it, but it could also damage historical and natural sites, and the two sides continue to fight about what is most important.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dakota Pipeline Controversy

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    There is a current sociological event happening right now, where thousands of people have passed or are passing through the camp of Standing Rock calling themselves water protectors. A 1,200-mile-long pipeline is being constructed by a Texas based energy company called Energy Transfer. The pipeline also known as the Dakota Access Pipeline, is designed to transport 570,000 barrels of crude oil per day from North Dakota to Illinois. The Pipeline project originally proposed to go over the Missouri River but was rejected due to the fact that it was too close to residential areas, roads, and lands. Approved by a government agency the US Corps of Engineers, the pipeline is now approved to be built under the Missouri River and this portion of…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “This magnificent area is as vast as it is wild, from the windswept coastal plain where polar bears and caribou give birth, to the towering Brooks Range where Dall sheep cling to cliffs and wolves howl in the midnight sun.” Here, former President Jimmy Carter is portraying the beauty and diversity in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge. In the Foreword of Subhankar Banerjee’s book “Arctic national wildlife refuge in: seasons of life and gland, a Photographic Journey”, President Jimmy Carter attempts to persuade his audience that the Arctic Wildlife refuge should not be developed for industry. He proves this by appealing to the audience by highlighting the importance of the refuge, including why the opposition would fail, and using purposeful…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays