Archeologists Vs. Historians

Improved Essays
In chapter one said that archaeologists and historians study how people lived in the past. But they also tell that archaeologists and historians use different methods to learn and obtain information from the past.Historians based more directly to letters and diary entries, and in enormous variety of public documents, such as laws speeches, newspapers, and court cases. In the other hand, archaeologists tend to focus more on physical objects such as bones, spear points, pots, baskets, jewelry, clothing, and buildings. Historians use more on writing that people had left behind, so the historians rely more on the archaeologists because they specialize more in learning about people who did not document their information in writings. Archaeologists

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    History is taught from what was written on documents but not all written documents tell the truth as many are from only the victors side. Archaeology helps dig up information about the past before written documents were a thing. Archaeology helps prove written statements about events that took place. It also pieces together why things happened through the physical material left behind (buildings, pottery, tools, roads, rivers, etc.) • Anthropology-…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In several sections of the book, the author would speak about something and then in the same sentence say that archeological evidence could not support her statement. One example of this is when she is referencing the treatment of newborns and she says “Lullabies may have been sung for her while she was still in the womb, though if so they have left no trace in the archaeological record,” which implies she is making an assumption without having any basis to do so (Szpakowska 35, 36). If she is unsure or there is no record of it, I am unsure what purpose it serves to be written in the book. She also spoke of archeological blunders of the past such as a lack in record keeping or a lack of consistency in the record keeping that was done. When speaking of infant burial, she states “the situation becomes even more unclear when we realize that archaeologists do not use any consistent definitions or terminology” (Szpakowska 34).…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History is a subject based on story telling. Sometimes, it is based off letters and written documents. History is not written down for others to learn in a nonbiased opinion in the present moment. Historians must go through these documents later and decide what is biased, and what is not. They must read about an event from multiple perspectives and try and pick out what happened and what is an opinion.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A historian needs to describe the various influences of the age, the climate of opinion or intellectual atmosphere, and the effect of that period of history on subsequent centuries. Above all, the historian will attempt to show the meaning of the events so that readers will understand the significance of the period to human existence Porter, 2002). Could the Great Depression have been avoided? Most historians will agree that the two main factors that lead to the Great Depression were the crash of the stock market, and the Great Plains Dust Bowl.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historical documents need to be interpreted so they can be fully understood. Historians must do research on the time period being studied to better reconstruct the past. Reconstructing the past is necessary when primary sources only provide an incomplete picture of the past. Patterns must be made, and all possibilities must be challenged. Historians take what information they know, and take information from multiple other sources that can be obtained to try and create a full picture of what happened in the past.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Robert Townsend, assistant director for research at the American Historical Association, historians are researchers who develop a sense of the standard opinions on a particular historical subject by reading other historians’ work on the subject, then use source materials, where they get their support and evidence from, to build new interpretations or follow new insights. Their findings are then put together in books, articles, websites, reports or museum scripts. Throughout their careers, historians are likely to come to face many obstacles, especially when it comes to analysing certain works or events. Contemporary affairs, or even morals and prejudices might influence the interpretation of ancient work, hence explaining why…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The archaeologists thought the tribes should be grateful for the science to replace their histories that were mostly based on myths. It was also frustrating to the archaeologists to have Native Americans say they, “…already knew their past through myth and spiritual communication since it was alive in the present…” (Pearson, 2008). There is not enough information about the burials because of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, or NAGPRA. This law calls for the greater protection for Native American burial sites and controls the removal process of human remains, funerary objects, and other sacred items.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stuart Piggott Rubbish

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Archaeologist Stuart Piggott called his profession "the science of rubbish." He calls it that because archaeologists are the rubbish collectors of the past, and the scrap of history are the evidence; what people threw away, forgot about, or were unable to reclaim. Through excavation, analysis, study, and writing, archaeology brings the past to life. Present trash is newer, fresher, and riper than ancient Rome or Mesopotamia, but it still holds clues to how people live. To sort the waste in each area, archaeologists look up a site such as a city dump and sort through the garbage item by item, recording amounts, types, and brand…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though there is no single truth that is agreed on, one can learn from the experiences and knowledge that comes from attempting to find the truth. Another important difference that Gaddis writes about is that some natural scientists are able to repeat their experiments in order to determine the truth and what is happening, but historians do not have the ability to do that. He writes, “we cannot relive, retrieve, or rerun it as we might some laboratory experiment or computer simulation” (Gaddis, 3). He tells his readers that historians can only study something that has already happened, so they lack the ability of scientists to be able to repeat these events in order to further their study of them. Although he points out that historians cannot create the exact experiment he also mentions that there are certain subfields in the natural sciences that are also unable to recreate the exact conditions of the time and place for use in their studies.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Archaeology is a branch of anthropology which is rebuilds the daily life of people who lived in the past to explain the changing of the culture, and the gender behaviours, roles and attitudes in our culture. Gender archaeology is looking for evidence of gender roles and gender relations to help us understand the values and the relations between the genders in our society and what did each gender do in the past society, and how the society seeing women and men. Gender relations and roles, in all the societies every gender has different duties. Females were the primary caregivers of children in all species of primates. Women’s always working with the children carrying them, playing with them and she performing the household task like cooking and…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay 1-1 Before this assignment I had not really thought much about what the differences between history and social sciences, such as political science, anthropology, and sociology, might be. After giving it some thought, I came to notice some of the differences, but I did struggle because the majority of my history classes focused on the United States while briefly touching on the history of the world. As stated in the lecture, both history and social sciences examine the past, but while they have some things in common they are also different for a few reasons. What is studied in these topics differs in how they explain the past events and how well they can explain or predict current and future events. History focuses on the past and how the events of…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The traces left on these material products can reveal information about an individual. In addition, archaeologists also use these traces of skeletal remains and material products to investigate human migration patterns and life ways in broad areas. For example: the shallow cut on any material or skeletal remains can determined many characteristics of a certain individual. There are also sub-disciplines of archaeology and they are as follows: bioarchaeology, historical and pre-historical archaeology and contemporary…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Philosophy Vs History

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In chapter 9 of the Poetics, Aristotle famously claims that poetry is “more philosophic” than history. He grounds this claim in the apparent fact that while universals drive the action of poetry, particulars drive the action of history. In an historical composition, a particular thing happens because a particular person did it at some point in the past, but in poetry, a particular thing happens because it is what is likely according to a universal principle. The particular action in a poetic composition is still, of course, particular, but it points to a universal principle, or it is a representation of a universal principle. Aristotle goes on to single out Herodotus, saying that his work would be no less a history than it is now were it written…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interpretation of the past is an immense task left mostly to historians, who themselves have differing views and methods among each other. In From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods, Martha Howell and Walter Prevenier provide a history of the methodical and theoretical changes that historians have embraced and rejected. Many of these transformations were inspired by other disciplines as well as a reflection of social and political climates. Howell and Prevenier explain the different schools of thought, such as structuralism, post-structuralism, positivist views, as well as inspirations from Marxists, and how historians utilize those schools of thought to describe and interpret the past.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology today has become very advanced in the recent centuries allowing humans to learn more than ever. Recently, multiple ways have been discovered to hunt treasures, hurricanes, and ancient civilizations using more advanced methods than ever before. Although all the ways are advanced, the method for finding ancient civilizations is the most advanced. The archaeologists method is the most advanced due to its ability to go right over the areas not wasting time and the technology is just simply more modern and high class.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays