Liquidated Damages Essay

Improved Essays
COMPENSATION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT WHERE PENALTY IS STIPULATED FOR

Liquidated damages where the sentence is specified
Section 74 of the Act deals with the parties have agreed in the contract, the penalty for breach of contract itself provides that liquidated damages. The main principle behind this festival is to promote certainty in commercial contracts. Article 74 stipulates that compensation, the amount does not exceed the terms of the contract, it must take into account the victim default. It further provides that such damage must take into account, whether they prove any actual loss or damage to the injured party. Genuine pre-estimate of damages and punitive interpretation of Article 74 differentiate between. The penalty will be a sum of money, which is specified in order to discourage people from breach of contract. When one of the contractual obligations of
…show more content…
• Section 74 read with Section 73 and, therefore, in each case of default, and the aggrieved person to prove that he suffered before he can apply for a decree does not require a breach of contract, the actual loss or damage. Under the circumstances the Court has the ability, even without proof of actual loss suffered the consequences of breach of a violation of a reasonable award of compensation.
• In some contracts, it would be impossible to court, in order to assess the breach, if we consider the compensation will not be punished or unreasonable manner, the court may grant the same, if it is a genuine pre-estimate of the parties arising compensation As a reasonable compensation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tort of negligence is when you fail to meet the standard of care required by the law, which causes harm of damage to the other party, which falls below an expected standard of care (Crips & Taylor 2008). When we owe a duty of care to someone, we are responsible for the breach of duty. In negligence, it doesn’t matter that the person who caused the injury did not mean to do so because the purpose of the action is to recover damage for the injury (Crisp & Taylor 2008). The safe way for the nurses to avoid being involved in actions related to negligence is to maintain proper standards of care, maintain safe environment for patients, good communication, know the competences, document correctly, maintain good relation with the patients. Nurses…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 P1 Bungburys

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When a contract is broken the injured party will look to be compensated for this breach, a court will look to compensate them financially or by forcing the other party, if possible, to carry out the contract as agreed in the first place. Frustration of…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sucha Partners Case

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Memorandum 1: On Advice to Sucha Tees: Standing and Probability of Success in Suit against BVD Partners, Bertie, TMI, and Vinnie (1) Sucha Tees v. BVD Partners, 2) Sucha Tees v. Bertie, 3) Sucha Tees v. TMI, 4) Sucha Tees v. Vinnie) I. Issue and Relevant Questions Sucha Tees seeks payment for $1000 spent on their custom t-shirts? Do all four defendants—Vinnie Pacciotto, Bertie Vastar, TMI, and BVD Partners—all assume liability for the payment? If so, how will payment be divided?…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper gives a short introduction of tort law and mainly focus on the standard of care, how the courts determining what is the ‘reasonable person’ and whether there are some exceptions to the courts. The law of tort is the law of civil liability for wrongfully injury which provides remedies to individuals harmed by the wrongful conduct of others in order to protect an individual’s private rights. There are two major categories of torts: intentional tort and negligent tort. The general principle of negligence is concerned with compensating people who have injured or damaged and thus a defendant will be negligent if he or she falling below the standard of the ordinary reasonable man in the same situation. A person will be liable for their…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glimer Case Study

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Glimer, there was some ambiguity about the effect of the statutory exclusion for contracts of employment because, the arbitration clause was not in a contract between an employee and an employer, but rather was in a contract between an employee and the agency. The Supreme Court clarified the ambiguity in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, where the Court interpreted the exemption for “contracts of employment” exceptionally narrowly. The Court held that the statute applied to all contracts of employment except those involving workers who, like seamen and railroad workers, were engaged in transportation that crossed state lines. . Therefore, it is now clear that the FAA allows enforcement of agreements mandating arbitration of employment…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    5.1 Liquidated Damages: • Due to the contract being sucked away in the aftermaths of Hurricane Llewelyn, it is unknown whether the contract had a liquidated damage clause. (2-718) • If it did, we would be required to determine if the liquidated damage clause caused a penalty or not on the breacher 5.2 Expectation • The goal of the expectation damage would be to put MJC where they would have been had NSH performed. To do that you must take the difference of the market price at the time when the buyer learned of the breach and contract price (8,000*12= 96,000) together with any incidental and consequential damages, but less expenses saved in consequence of the seller’s breach. (§2-713) 5.3 Specific Performance: • MJC has the right to demand…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Promissory Estoppel Essay

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay seeks to discuss the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and the Doctrine of Consideration, as well as a clear analysis, with the use of case law, how Promissory Estoppel has become an exception to the general principle that a promise may only be enforced if it is supported by good consideration; it will ultimately conclude whether or not a promise to accept a smaller sum in discharge of a larger sum, if acted upon, is binding notwithstanding the absence of consideration. A contract is a legally binding agreement in law between two or more parties, which is enforced by law or by binding arbitration if it covers the elements of a valid legal agreement. For there to be a valid contract, three elements must be present, offer, acceptance, and consideration. If there is no consideration, there is no contract; however, with promissory estoppel instead of consideration, if there is a promise which induces reliance, the court would find some sort of liability for the promise.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tort Of Negligence Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue The matters involved in the case facts is if Rebecca can sue Michelle for negligence based on tort law and Rebecca?s decision to accept the ride home even if she knows that Michelle was drunk to drive. Rule The court needs to prove that Michelle has a duty of care to Rebecca. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of Michelle.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This refers to what the injured party reasonably thought they would get out of the contract. The goal of the court in this scenario is to put the injured party in the position they would be in if both parties had fully performed…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    case is the leading in English contract law and has been considered as the most current case changing the rule presented in Stilk v Myrick. Williams v Roffey Bros. case is far more differences from the traditional rules of consideration which consist of ‘pre-existing duty doctrine’. Pre-existing duty doctrine is a ‘party to a contract is under a pre-existing duty to perform, then no consideration is given for any modification of the contract and the modification is therefore voidable.’ In today’s society, “pre-existing duty rule’ is generally connecting to Stilk v Myrick. The case is follows the pre-existing rule because the captain’s promise of paying wage to the sailors was classified as no consideration because ‘sail the ship home safely’ was in their original contract.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Day v Mead extended the common law notion of contributory negligence to equitable compensation as a way of achieving practical justice. For similar reasons, in the case Aquaculture v NZ Green Mussel Co, it is held that the common law remedy of compensatory damages may be legally awarded in New Zealand courts for breach of an equitable duty. According to Cooke P, “for all purposes now material, Equity and common law are mingled and merged”, and therefore a “full range of remedies should be available to the court irrespective of whether they originated in common law, Equity or statute”. There has even been some discussion about the idea of repealing s 99 of the Judicature Act (NZ) in order to facilitate this…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James, Adjou, Sylvia, Bob and Tim (represented by Ian) require identifying and advice as to the applicability of relevant contract and tort/delict principles to the current scenario presented in the problem question. Before proceeding with advising the individual’s, we need to check the validity of the contract and to establish the note displayed on the car windscreen is “Invitation to Treat” (or) “Offer”. The difference between the two is significant and need to be specifically identify, as the ‘invitation to treat’ cannot be accepted legally and an offer is an expression of willingness to contract on the specified terms without further negotiation and which is legally accepted.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays