Since, the condition of every countries in this world is different. They can not fulfill their own needs by themselves, but there is also some countries that has a lot of natural resources more than the others, it creates the anarchy in the international scale. Every countries has its own interest in term of achieving their prosperity. According to liberalism, they competing each other to gain power. In the case of Arab Peninsula, which they have lot of resources, but still remained in conflict, I personally argue that the unstability of whether economic/political matters caused the risks, driven by the other countries who have economic and political stability. Simply because, …show more content…
They realize that, their energy resources will be gone in recent years, maybe sooner because of the climate change impact if it can not be solved as soon as possible. Back to the example of Indonesia, geographically Indonesia located in the Equator Line which make it is very fertile. The geographic of Arab Peninsula even it is not located in Equator Line, but it has a lot of oil. Some of Arab Peninsula’s countries is ranked on the highest exporter crude oil during 2015. It shows that, the economic stability of Arab Peninsula is very crucial because day by day the earth oil is decreasing but the people need oil is still can not be replace by other natural resources, even there is some, but the most of it still use oil as their main energy resources. Beside, the Arab Peninsula people are mostly Muslim. Some of the terrorist movement coming from this region, can be mentioned Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, ISIS, and etc. Most of them are trying to create their own regime using any violence that will threat the human right in the sense of humanity. I personaly think that, when a case come into human right and in the name humanity, it willeasily provocate others to fight for the violence simply because we are all …show more content…
Or it is only the Arabs socially constucted? I strongly said that from 100%, it is caused by the other countries which have economic stability is 99% and the rest of it can be said socially constructed by the Arabs in term of separatism or even rebels movement. Since the example that I took is the PRRI/Permesta which shows that it was supported by the US, then I could say that it is tend to be cause by the other countries which have economic stability rather than Arab